What were their ages?
Ryan Badder was undefeated and 27 years old... Young
Shogun was 29.... Yeah, soooo old.
Lyoto Machida was 33.... Again, not out of his prime. It's not like Jiri Prochazka is out of his prime, for example.
Rashad Evans was 33. Again, not old. 33 < 37 < 42
Vitor Belfort — 35. Again, not old considering it's right there in the middle of already losing the athleticism, but not bad yet... Still very close to prime, plus Vitor was in full TRT there...
Chael Sonnen — 36 ... Not young but not old... If Jon Jones at 38 still is not considered old, then no one in the list is old at all...
Alexander Gustaffson — 26 same age as JJ
Glover Teixeira — 34 . Young, conserving he still was in very good performance in his 40s. And that was a 17 wins streak Glover.....
Daniel Cormier — 35 ... Not old either, specially since he was the HW champion, having defeated Stipe, when he was 40 years old. So 35 is a hugely good shape DC.
OSP — younger than JJ
DC 2 — 38 .... More or less old, the sam age as JJ now. The oldest one JJ faces so far was 38 yo DC, while he was as old as Aspinall is now. Problem is, DC had lost the first match and he wanted this match badly, he wanted to be the one to beat up Jon Jones, he felt terrible after his first ever defeat 3 years ago when he was like Khabib, hadn't even lost a round.
Alexander Gustaffson II — same age as JJ
Anthony Smith — younger than JJ
Thiago Santos — 35 (not old either... JJ was 32)
Dominick Reyes — younger than Jon Jones
Cyril Gane — younger than JJ and younger than Reyes, as well...
Miocic — 42
So you were proven wrong. JJ faced no old washed up champions, unless early 30s is old. The oldest gap was vs DC, and still, in the first fight DC was 35... In the second, DC was 38. And the circumstances are different... DC wanted the rematch.
Jon Jones has fought 5 opponents younger than him, one as old and the other ones were older but no one was even near their 40s, the oldest one was DC II ... JJ defeated all kind of opponents. If you notice, many younger prospects tried fighting Alexander Gustaffson, DC, Glover, Lyoto... Younger prospects than JJ have tried many times... Still, the fact the division was dominated by the first era who was ~ early 30s mean they were the best ones, and not old. Second generation had DC fighting JJ as 35 and 38. Not old. 38 might be but DC wanted the second match badly. And so did JJ. DC later was competitive until 42 yo... So the fact he was 38 meant nothing as I'm "oh there wasn't an younger opponent". The ok, give one younger opponent right then that would be in LHW and be more of a threat than DC?
So, just so I can know that it's worth my time, do you accept that you were wrong? If not, then you just want to keep a viewpoint no matter how nonsensical it is.