- Joined
- Nov 2, 2017
- Messages
- 1,445
- Reaction score
- 1,087
Well, he beat up Gustaffson, Santos and Reyes. Making it a close match # losing. Sure, he has proved that he is human. Everyone is human. It's hard for someone to fight 30x, against heavy competition, many fighters being in the hall of fame, defending his title, like, 15x and to not have a close match in neither of those. Khabib had the same record, but again, Khabib had as many fighters in the UFC as Jon Jones had title defenses, basically. Much of Khabib's fights, half actually, were in another organization where the fighters had, like, an average to poor win lose ratio and streak. Ofc Jon Jones record will make him look more human than someone whose records came from fighting way less high level fighters.Look at my join date. And I followed MMA since the late 90's (and trained and fought from 2004-2007). I bet on Jones when he beat Shogun for the belt, my guy. I'm an old head, nobody is telling me things about Jones that I dont know. And people on this site were telling me I was stupid, that paying juice on a prospect vs a proven champ like Shogun was so dumb, etc. And I tried telling them that Jones was a generational talent. And Jones beat Shogun like an adult throwing a child around.
The problem is that people hold onto the past, and think what they saw before is what they'll see next time. I get the "until someone proves differently..." argument but it's not like we haven't seen Jones vulnerable. He should've lost to Reyes but got a robbery. Santos could've beaten him (although I did give Jones that one). Gus took him to the brink in their first fight. He's not an invincible superman.
And now...he's getting old. He's fighting in a weight class he's not really suited for. He's still talented enough to beat a guy like Gane who's a mental midget and didn't seem to want to be there. Or an ancient Stipe who hadn't fought in 4 years. That's so so so much different than fighting a younger, confident, bigger, faster guy with more power who can also grapple.
Again...is it possible Jones turns back the clock and looks markedly better than vs Stipe? Sure. Likely? IMO...no. And IF he looks like that, he's not getput of the 2nd round. He will get blasted.
Still though, since 2011, fighting monsters, and not losing once, despite the fighters making it close, is absurd, is something that no one did. Not only that, you can't fight all you want against that, but after he beat up Gus the second time, the division was kinda boring, there was no big name. JJ still fought the new generation there (not all fighters ofc) and beat up the 3 fighters from the new generation whom the organization put him against. Then he moved to HW, many ppl saying that'd be his biggest challenge (saying Gane was a midget is easy to say after the fact, very few ppl were even saying that before), defeated Gane like child's play. Then he defeated Miocic... Miocic is older, but Miocic was as old as DC was when DC fought Miocic the third time. Miocic was, then, as old as JJ now. DC made it very challenging still. Miocic wasn't the only one who had been inactive, Jon Jones pretty much only fought Reyes... Then he had a 3 minutes experience as a HW against a young, fast, strong guy — Gane — then had a nasty injury that took him away from training for 8 months. He had never even been in a second round, every as a heavyweight. Stipe? Many time. JJ still made it look easy.
Stipe was slow? Sure, Shogun was also slow after JJ beat him up in the g&p, while landing wayyyy less elbows than vs Miocic. You are going to slow down after getting hit 50x by a HW in the g&p. The fact is, Jon Jones isn't a thing of the past, as of yet... He keeps winning. There is no denying that. Ofc Aspinall is a very tough match. But to say he will easily defeat Jon? Quoting DDP here:
"Come on, how people can say that? He moved up, people were saying Gane would be the biggest challenge ever... He made it look like child's play. People who ignore history, are the naive ones".