Why aren't we already seeing Aspinall vs. Gane?

Aspinalls record is clearly better both in terms of the opposition and the way he dispatched of them.
Aspinall
  • Arlovski
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
  • Tybura
  • Pav
  • Blaydes (1-1)

Gane
  • Boser
  • JDS
  • Roz
  • Volkov
  • Lewis
  • Tai
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
Gane obviously has the better recordand it's not particularly close, hence why you wanted to add that additinal qualifier. Gane was always ranked ahead of Tom until the interim belt ranking rules forced Tom ahead to its arbitrary #1 spot because he does have the better record. And there's a very good chance Gane would still be #1 today if the rankings were open to actually voting for Tom's ranking after we saw how much Tom's Pav win actually was worth.

Just stop with the hyperbole guys. You can say Jon/Tom should be next without all the constant blatant lies.
 
Man, whatever you do don't look up Aspinall's record by comparison
Aspinall has beat better competition than Gane (including a guy Gane has openly ducked), and hasn't had any titleshots yet. It's a dead division so all he can do is fight what's there though, especially when Gane was ducking him too.

Not sure what you're point is.
 
Aspinall has beat better competition than Gane (including a guy Gane has openly ducked), and hasn't had any titleshots yet. It's a dead division so all he can do is fight what's there though, especially when Gane was ducking him too.

Not sure what you're point is.
Aspinall
  • Arlovski
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
  • Tybura
  • Pav
  • Blaydes (1-1)
Gane
  • Boser
  • JDS
  • Roz
  • Volkov
  • Lewis
  • Tai
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
Stop lying.
 
Aspinall
  • Arlovski
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
  • Tybura
  • Pav
  • Blaydes (1-1)
Gane
  • Boser
  • JDS
  • Roz
  • Volkov
  • Lewis
  • Tai
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
Stop lying.

Don't mention that Gane should absolutely have lost his last fight vs Volkov. 19 of 20 media scorecards for Volkov.

Aspinall has one UFC loss on a freak non contact injury.

You're a clown.
 
Don't mention that Gane should absolutely have lost his last fight vs Volkov. 19 of 20 media scorecards for Volkov.

Aspinall has one UFC loss on a freak non contact injury.

You're a clown.
We're now at the delusional stage that maybe possibly losing a close decision is worse than actually losing a fight.

Amazing. Great stuff man, keep it up.
 
We're now at the delusional stage that maybe possibly losing a close decision is worse than actually losing a fight.

Amazing. Great stuff man, keep it up.

There's no delusion. Only context which you ignore as long as it helps you keep thag tight grip on Jones' nutsack.

Gane was also choked out inside a round, and lost to striker by getting outwrestled.

But hey, if we just wanna go by results in the UFC without context:

Gane winning % 83.33
Aspinall winning % 88.88

Clearly Aspinall more successful in the UFC. Easy.
 
If they are gonna make Tom the real champ than yes him vs Gane makes sense. But they haven't done that yet.
 
Aspinall
  • Arlovski
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
  • Tybura
  • Pav
  • Blaydes (1-1)

Gane
  • Boser
  • JDS
  • Roz
  • Volkov
  • Lewis
  • Tai
  • Spivac
  • Volkov
Gane obviously has the better record and it's not particularly close, hence why you wanted to add that additinal qualifier. Gane was always ranked ahead of Tom until the interim belt ranking rules forced Tom ahead to its arbitrary #1 spot because he does have the better record. And there's a very good chance Gane would still be #1 today if the rankings were open to actually voting for Tom's ranking after we saw how much Tom's Pav win actually was worth.

Just stop with the hyperbole guys. You can say Jon/Tom should be next without all the constant blatant lies.

Gane has never beaten anyone whos stock was anywhere near as high as Pavs was when Tom iced him in the first round. He was on a six fight first round KO streak which included Blaydes, Lewis and Tai and was being hyped up as a monster with massive KO power who was in his absolute prime. Even after Tom took his soul he still beat Rozenstruik.

Volkov? Gane went to a competitive 5 round decision with him the first time and just lost to him in most peoples eyes, Tom stopped him in the first round.

Spivac? Tom did it quicker

How many HW prospects have avoided fighting Blaydes in the last decade? its almost like the UFC deemed it a risky stylistic match up for Gane or something. Tom wiped him out in the first round. (LOL @ trying to legitimise Toms "loss" to Blaydes as well. Absolutely pathetic)


Let me guess, if we go through your post history theres gonna be a lot of defending Jon...right? 99% of the people that try to talk up Gane at this point are doing it to try and make Jon look better. Its very transparent.
 
There's no delusion. Only context which you ignore as long as it helps you keep thag tight grip on Jones' nutsack.

Gane was also choked out inside a round, and lost to striker by getting outwrestled.

But hey, if we just wanna go by results in the UFC without context:

Gane winning % 83.33
Aspinall winning % 88.88

Clearly Aspinall more successful in the UFC. Easy.
The context to try and make Aspinall's obviously lesser record better than Gane's is to ignore that he hasn't rematched Volkov or fought Ngannou and Jones like Gane has?

That's a bold strategy Cotton.
 
Gane has never beaten anyone whos stock was anywhere near as high as Pavs was when Tom iced him in the first round. He was on a six fight first round KO streak which included Blaydes, Lewis and Tai and was being hyped up as a monster with massive KO power who was in his absolute prime. Even after Tom took his soul he still beat Rozenstruik.

Volkov? Gane went to a competitive 5 round decision with him the first time and just lost to him in most peoples eyes, Tom stopped him in the first round.

Spivac? Tom did it quicker

How many HW prospects have avoided fighting Blaydes in the last decade? its almost like the UFC deemed it a risky stylistic match up for Gane or something. Tom wiped him out in the first round. (LOL @ trying to legitimise Toms "loss" to Blaydes as well. Absolutely pathetic)


Let me guess, if we go through your post history theres gonna be a lot of defending Jon...right? 99% of the people that try to talk up Gane at this point are doing it to try and make Jon look better. Its very transparent.
I'm not reading your novel because you can't count to 8 which is how many good UFC wins Gane has.

Not surprising though considering Tom only has 6 which you seem to think is the better record.
 
The context to try and make Aspinall's obviously lesser record better than Gane's is to ignore that he hasn't rematched Volkov or fought Ngannou and Jones like Gane has?

That's a bold strategy Cotton.

I posted their winning percentages, period. You don't get to decide WHICH context matters.
 
It is called business..............Gane vs Tom no one cares, it is the last resort. Tom vs Jones, biggest fight the UFC can make right now and if Tom wins maybe that turns Tom into a big draw for many years to come.

I think the UFC will give Jones up until August sometime to commit(MSG Nov is target date for the fight) or they are stripping him and moving on. Going forward they will just treat Jones similar to Conor, maybe he fights, maybe he doesn't.
 
I posted their winning percentages, period. You don't get to decide WHICH context matters.
Did you also post that Ciryl has 3 more UFC fights than Tom or did that context also not matter
 
The context to try and make Aspinall's obviously lesser record better than Gane's is to ignore that he hasn't rematched Volkov or fought Ngannou and Jones like Gane has?

Lmao wow...

Gane was being given a gift with the Volkov rematch, an unnecessary rematch with a stylistically favourable opponent he had already beaten, rather than a fresh match up with highly ranked grapplers Blaydes or Jailton who would have both been available. When he STILL managed to shit the bed he got yet another gift, this time from the judges.


And Tom cant fight Jon when Jon is running for his life from him can he?

I'm not reading your novel because you can't count to 8 which is how many good UFC wins Gane has.

Not surprising though considering Tom only has 6 which you seem to think is the better record.


I just hope this is trolling, I mean its poor quality trolling but the alternative of sucking another mans balls so hard that you actually believe these laughably shitty takes is genuinely quite sad.
 
Did you also post that Ciryl has 3 more UFC fights than Tom or did that context also not matter

I posted their winning percentages. Do you understand how math works?

Again, you don't get to pick and choose WHICH context matters to suit your argument.
 
Gane was being given a gift with the Volkov rematch, an unnecessary rematch with a stylistically favourable opponent he had already beaten, rather than a fresh match up with highly ranked grapplers Blaydes or Jailton who would have both been available. When he STILL managed to shit the bed he got yet another gift, this time from the judges.
And Tom wasn't given a gift for his interim defence with a rematch against Blaydes instead of a rematch with Volkov who had a better streak?

You also don't seem to be aware that 2 wins > 1-1 mate. Not Gane's fault he's winning close decisions while Tom's avenging losses because he didn't already beat those fighters when he had the chance.

Like Jesus. You guys argument is that a close decision to go 2-0 is WORSE than simply getting back to 1-1. It's beyond absurd.
And Tom cant fight Jon when Jon is running for his life from him can he?
I don't think you know how wins and losses work. Maybe you'll fight out if they fight.

You guys are taking points away from Gane for having a tougher schedule than Tom. It's silly. For all anybody knows he'd have even more losses with the same strength of schedule Gane's had.
I just hope this is trolling, I mean its poor quality trolling but the alternative of sucking another mans balls so hard that you actually believe these laughably shitty takes is genuinely quite sad.
It's trolling to point out that Ciryl has 2 more good wins than Tom does as well as better quality wins period so obviously has the better record?

The trolling is coming from you guys who are just repeating that Tom has the better record without ever saying how he does with less wins and less quality wins.
 
Back
Top