- Joined
- Nov 14, 2019
- Messages
- 23,591
- Reaction score
- 52,412
Because a lot of people want to pretend like John is not retired
Man, whatever you do don't look up Aspinall's record by comparison
Tom has got about a dozen punches in him before he gasses.


AspinallAspinalls record is clearly better both in terms of the opposition and the way he dispatched of them.
Aspinall has beat better competition than Gane (including a guy Gane has openly ducked), and hasn't had any titleshots yet. It's a dead division so all he can do is fight what's there though, especially when Gane was ducking him too.Man, whatever you do don't look up Aspinall's record by comparison
AspinallAspinall has beat better competition than Gane (including a guy Gane has openly ducked), and hasn't had any titleshots yet. It's a dead division so all he can do is fight what's there though, especially when Gane was ducking him too.
Not sure what you're point is.
Aspinall
Gane
- Arlovski
- Spivac
- Volkov
- Tybura
- Pav
- Blaydes (1-1)
Stop lying.
- Boser
- JDS
- Roz
- Volkov
- Lewis
- Tai
- Spivac
- Volkov
We're now at the delusional stage that maybe possibly losing a close decision is worse than actually losing a fight.Don't mention that Gane should absolutely have lost his last fight vs Volkov. 19 of 20 media scorecards for Volkov.
Aspinall has one UFC loss on a freak non contact injury.
You're a clown.
We're now at the delusional stage that maybe possibly losing a close decision is worse than actually losing a fight.
Amazing. Great stuff man, keep it up.
Aspinall
- Arlovski
- Spivac
- Volkov
- Tybura
- Pav
- Blaydes (1-1)
Gane
Gane obviously has the better record and it's not particularly close, hence why you wanted to add that additinal qualifier. Gane was always ranked ahead of Tom until the interim belt ranking rules forced Tom ahead to its arbitrary #1 spot because he does have the better record. And there's a very good chance Gane would still be #1 today if the rankings were open to actually voting for Tom's ranking after we saw how much Tom's Pav win actually was worth.
- Boser
- JDS
- Roz
- Volkov
- Lewis
- Tai
- Spivac
- Volkov
Just stop with the hyperbole guys. You can say Jon/Tom should be next without all the constant blatant lies.
The context to try and make Aspinall's obviously lesser record better than Gane's is to ignore that he hasn't rematched Volkov or fought Ngannou and Jones like Gane has?There's no delusion. Only context which you ignore as long as it helps you keep thag tight grip on Jones' nutsack.
Gane was also choked out inside a round, and lost to striker by getting outwrestled.
But hey, if we just wanna go by results in the UFC without context:
Gane winning % 83.33
Aspinall winning % 88.88
Clearly Aspinall more successful in the UFC. Easy.
I'm not reading your novel because you can't count to 8 which is how many good UFC wins Gane has.Gane has never beaten anyone whos stock was anywhere near as high as Pavs was when Tom iced him in the first round. He was on a six fight first round KO streak which included Blaydes, Lewis and Tai and was being hyped up as a monster with massive KO power who was in his absolute prime. Even after Tom took his soul he still beat Rozenstruik.
Volkov? Gane went to a competitive 5 round decision with him the first time and just lost to him in most peoples eyes, Tom stopped him in the first round.
Spivac? Tom did it quicker
How many HW prospects have avoided fighting Blaydes in the last decade? its almost like the UFC deemed it a risky stylistic match up for Gane or something. Tom wiped him out in the first round. (LOL @ trying to legitimise Toms "loss" to Blaydes as well. Absolutely pathetic)
Let me guess, if we go through your post history theres gonna be a lot of defending Jon...right? 99% of the people that try to talk up Gane at this point are doing it to try and make Jon look better. Its very transparent.
The context to try and make Aspinall's obviously lesser record better than Gane's is to ignore that he hasn't rematched Volkov or fought Ngannou and Jones like Gane has?
That's a bold strategy Cotton.
Did you also post that Ciryl has 3 more UFC fights than Tom or did that context also not matterI posted their winning percentages, period. You don't get to decide WHICH context matters.
The context to try and make Aspinall's obviously lesser record better than Gane's is to ignore that he hasn't rematched Volkov or fought Ngannou and Jones like Gane has?
I'm not reading your novel because you can't count to 8 which is how many good UFC wins Gane has.
Not surprising though considering Tom only has 6 which you seem to think is the better record.
Did you also post that Ciryl has 3 more UFC fights than Tom or did that context also not matter
And Tom wasn't given a gift for his interim defence with a rematch against Blaydes instead of a rematch with Volkov who had a better streak?Gane was being given a gift with the Volkov rematch, an unnecessary rematch with a stylistically favourable opponent he had already beaten, rather than a fresh match up with highly ranked grapplers Blaydes or Jailton who would have both been available. When he STILL managed to shit the bed he got yet another gift, this time from the judges.
I don't think you know how wins and losses work. Maybe you'll fight out if they fight.And Tom cant fight Jon when Jon is running for his life from him can he?
It's trolling to point out that Ciryl has 2 more good wins than Tom does as well as better quality wins period so obviously has the better record?I just hope this is trolling, I mean its poor quality trolling but the alternative of sucking another mans balls so hard that you actually believe these laughably shitty takes is genuinely quite sad.