Social ICE/deportation protests and riots megathread

"Yeah! How DARE they exercise their 1st amendment right to free speech!!!! It's not for THEM!!!!!111"

- MAGA cultist

Simple answer to what is legal protests.

"Legal restrictions on protests, protected by the First Amendment, focus on reasonable time, place, and manner (TPM), not content, meaning you can't block traffic or disrupt public safety but can usually protest on public land, though permits might be needed for large events, parades, or loud sound equipment; illegal acts include trespassing, vandalism, incitement to violence, and obstructing emergency services, even in protests."
 
Simple answer to what is legal protests.

"Legal restrictions on protests, protected by the First Amendment, focus on reasonable time, place, and manner (TPM), not content, meaning you can't block traffic or disrupt public safety but can usually protest on public land, though permits might be needed for large events, parades, or loud sound equipment; illegal acts include trespassing, vandalism, incitement to violence, and obstructing emergency services, even in protests."

It seems she was actively blocking ICE, sometimes two way traffic. Her partner was following her in foot, blowing a whistle.

That is obstruction, multiple traffic violations, conspiracy, assault with vehicle, avoiding arrest/fleeing

The witness in the video I posted says “he must have shot her 3 or 4 times in the face and THEN she floors it”. While also lying that he “jumped in the way after she took off “
 
Simple answer to what is legal protests.

"Legal restrictions on protests, protected by the First Amendment, focus on reasonable time, place, and manner (TPM), not content, meaning you can't block traffic or disrupt public safety but can usually protest on public land, though permits might be needed for large events, parades, or loud sound equipment; illegal acts include trespassing, vandalism, incitement to violence, and obstructing emergency services, even in protests."

True.

But I'd trust law enforcement to handle it instead of ICE.
 
Libs are outraged over ICE, but where was that same energy with Biden’s wide open border policy?
....which Kamala tried to reverse as a late rally to win the election as if she was not from the party which started that shit in the first place.

Where was the outrage over this issue?

 
Last edited:
It seems she was actively blocking ICE, sometimes two way traffic. Her partner was following her in foot, blowing a whistle.

That is obstruction, multiple traffic violations, conspiracy, assault with vehicle, avoiding arrest/fleeing

The witness in the video I posted says “he must have shot her 3 or 4 times in the face and THEN she floors it”. While also lying that he “jumped in the way after she took off “
I agree you should shoot people blowing a whistle.
 
I'm sure the US will accept millions of Venezuelan refugees, since they created them and they like Venezuelans so much.
 
Law enforcement there is ordered not to "handle it." So ICE has to handle it and as they legally can they do. ICE is law enforcement.

So, ICE is now the default for people exercising their 1st amendment rights vs. the police keeping law and order? What next? People should call JSOC when a cat gets stuck in a tree?
 
So, ICE is now the default for people exercising their 1st amendment rights vs. the police keeping law and order? What next? People should call JSOC when a cat gets stuck in a tree?

How about the local law enforcement be allowed to do their job by the people over them. Its not your first amendment right to illegally interfere with law enforcement. Thats what ICE is doing is enforcement of laws that have been on the books. If the democrats don't like the laws why don't they try to change them.
 
Law enforcement there is ordered not to "handle it." So ICE has to handle it and as they legally can they do. ICE is law enforcement.
No. ICE do not have the legal authority to enforce any traffic violations. This jurisdiction falls under state and local law enforcement.

If a legal US citizen is parallel parked in the middle of the road, protesting and blocking the road, ICE do not have the legal authority to detain that person. Even if this person is blocking their path, they have to either call state/local law enforcement to deal with the traffic violation, or find a way to go around the individual (drive on the sidewalk, or if not possible turn around and take another road).
 
How about the local law enforcement be allowed to do their job by the people over them. Its not your first amendment right to illegally interfere with law enforcement. Thats what ICE is doing is enforcement of laws that have been on the books. If the democrats don't like the laws why don't they try to change them.

They are allowed to do their jobs. It's just that NO ONE is complaining about the protests there. That's why the cops aren't out there.

Come on man.
 
How about the local law enforcement be allowed to do their job by the people over them. Its not your first amendment right to illegally interfere with law enforcement. Thats what ICE is doing is enforcement of laws that have been on the books. If the democrats don't like the laws why don't they try to change them.
First amendment right to protest is a real thing.

She was violating local traffic laws by blocking the road, but that is a state/local law enforcement issue. ICE do not have jurisdiction to deal with traffic violations. The correct course of action was for ICE to contact local law enforcement, and then laugh as the woman gets arrested.
 
Back
Top