Crime Trump escalates crime rhetoric ahead of Washington crackdown announcement

Im not speaking to Twitter, but Reddit. As I've heard it for Twitter though, the experience was similar to Reddit where conservative voices were being suppressed by those rules you mentioned before, which favoured leftists and punished rightists. Not saying that's the truth for Twitter, but that's what I heard at the height of those charges.

Reddit is another monster entirely. It's not just the "model" or that the"majority" likes it, that's the misconception, although it is a bad model. The moderators on Reddit are basement dwelling ideologues who will ban you the moment your opinion runs contrary to the left wing perspective or for holding certain views. Those views are also not things that aren't inline with the rules either, half the time they don't even explain why you're being banned. No warnings either, just "you've been permanently banned from r/cooking for breaking our rules." No explanation, no warnings, no points given like we do here, just banned.

The reason why I would love to see it turned into an echo chamber or to be completely crushed is because there's a lot of this right here, what you're currently doing where it's like playing hide and go seek with the reality. While I understand twitter is something you have experience with and I don't, I have a feeling you would probably say the same thing about Reddit if you were a regular user over there.

But I assure you, it's not the model, as shit as it is, it's the lefties that run the place. Yes, I would LOVE to watch their online haven be absolutely dismantled.


EDIT: feel free to respond here if you'd like, but I'll continue this myself in the lounge if you'd like to carry on there. Don't want to derail the thread with this.
Go to r/conservative they are equally biased and have even starting banning non maga conservatives for being against government involvement in cities, funding wars, etc. all forums are biased. All subs are the same and just depends on the mods and their beliefs
 
I love it when a Shertifa poster always brings up a city that has been democrat controlled for decades and has voted dem for decades as some sort of gotcha. D'oh!
 
Go to r/conservative they are equally biased and have even starting banning non maga conservatives for being against government involvement in cities, funding wars, etc. all forums are biased. All subs are the same and just depends on the mods and their beliefs
A drop in the bucket.

There are some subs that are definitely conservative/ right wing enclaves, but unless specified, you can more or less assume everything else is left leaning. Even the weird ones you wouldn't expect, most sports subs too.

But yes, you're right. They all have their biases, they just need to admit it.
 
Go to r/conservative they are equally biased and have even starting banning non maga conservatives for being against government involvement in cities, funding wars, etc. all forums are biased. All subs are the same and just depends on the mods and their beliefs
r/conservative is supposed to be bias towards Conservatives, hence the name. r/politics is supposed to be the neutral format for all sides to come and debate but it is an absolute trash heap of Democratic propaganda. That's the difference.
 
r/conservative is supposed to be bias towards Conservatives, hence the name. r/politics is supposed to be the neutral format for all sides to come and debate but it is an absolute trash heap of Democratic propaganda. That's the difference.
My point is conservative is biased towards extreme right wing and moderate conservatives get banned
 
I think it is. DC made (international) headlines. Trump sent troops there. Chicago made headlines, (60 shootings in one weekend) he's sending troops there.

On a semi related point- I'm really not understanding the opposition to sending in the guard to clean up these areas that have topped the most dangerous lists for decades. Have we really become this used to violence just being the way it is in these cities?
That was addressed in my first post why I have a problem with it. He’s choosing cities that have been unfriendly towards him. That’s why he’s skipping past 20 cities that actually rank higher in violent crime rates.

Don’t you think it’s a problem to ignore much more dangerous places?
 

Leaked plans show Pentagon eyeing Louisiana to deploy national guard​

Documents show intent to deploy 1,000 troops to conduct law enforcement operations in urban centers

Donald Trump’s administration has drafted a proposal to deploy 1,000 Louisiana national guard troops to conduct law enforcement operations in the state’s urban centers, the Washington Post reported Saturday, citing military planning documents it had obtained.

Trump has made crime a major focus of his administration even as violent crime rates have fallen in many US cities. His crackdown on Democratic-led municipalities has fueled legal concerns and spurred protests, including a recent demonstration by several thousand people in Washington DC.

Democratic leaders have said that the massive deployments are more a show of power by Trump rather than a serious effort to fight crime.

More than a dozen residents of Shreveport, Louisiana, told Reuters they viewed any deployment as more of a political stunt than a meaningful crime-fighting solution – and a way for Trump to blunt criticism that he’s only targeting Democratic-controlled states.

Louisiana’s governor, Jeff Landry, is Republican. The mayors of Shreveport and Baton Rouge, two of Louisiana’s most prominent cities, are Republicans. But the mayor of New Orleans, the state’s best-known city, is a Democrat.

A Pentagon spokesperson did not comment in detail on the documents. A spokesperson said: “Leaked documents should not be interpreted as policy. We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise.”

The planning documents, according to the Post, state that the plan would allow the military to supplement law enforcement in cities such as New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Both cities have majority Black populations.

The Pentagon’s plan outlines a mobilization lasting until 30 September 2026, though no start date was specified.

Among the documents is an unsigned, undated draft memo from Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth to US attorney general Pam Bondi and homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, which highlights the “unique advantage” of the military’s proposed approach to law enforcement in Louisiana, according to the Post.

Hinging on a request for troop deployment from Landry, who is a staunch Trump supporter, the proposal has not been confirmed as approved by federal or state officials, according to the Post’s reporting. The Pentagon’s Louisiana plan suggests a robust operation is under consideration, with national guard personnel “supplementing” the law enforcement presence in high-crime neighborhoods. They could also help with drug interdiction and by providing “logistical and communications support” to local authorities, the Washington Post reported.

On Friday, Trump said he would send national guard troops to Memphis, Tennessee.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/13/louisiana-national-guard-pentagon
 

‘It’s not safe in DC as an immigrant’: racial profiling surged during Trump’s Washington takeover​


Kira Lerner in Washington

The deployment of troops has led to arrests for low-level crime, indiscriminate detention and a rise in racial profiling

Kira Lerner

Kira Lerner in Washington

In the 30 days since Donald Trump took control of Washington DC’s police department and deployed national guard troops, the city has seen the indiscriminate detention of immigrants, the rise of racial profiling and the arrests of large numbers of people for low-level crimes.

The US president claimed the takeover, which began on 11 August, was necessary because of violent crime in the country’s capital, especially after the attempted carjacking and assault of a former Doge staffer. “Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people,” Trump said during a news conference at the White House at the time.

But although Washington DC has long struggled with gun violence, its violent crime rate is at a 30-year low, much lower than that of cities in red states. And the large majority of people affected by the federal takeover are not perpetrators of violent crime.

Both groups targeted – immigrants and those accused of minor crimes – have been largely picked up by law enforcement through racial profiling and other tactics that experts say have instilled a climate of fear and a distrust of law enforcement.

A White House official said on Monday that 2,120 people have been arrested since the start of Trump’s takeover, 20 known gang members had been arrested and 214 firearms had been seized. Although violent crime has decreased during this period, Washington residents say the impact has not been worth the overbearing law enforcement presence.

Federal agents with numerous agencies, including Immigrations and customs enforcement (Ice), Customs and Border Protection, Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Park Service, Secret Service, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the US marshals service have all been activated across the city. Often a single arrest will involve officers from multiple agencies and the local Metropolitan police department (MPD).

Though the deployment of national guard troops from six states was the most high-profile aspect of the 30 days, the camo-clad troops, who are now armed, were largely focused on patrolling tourist sites and Union Station, the city’s main train station. With little work to be done, some were instructed to do landscaping and other “beautification” tasks.

The Home Rule Act – which allowed Washington DC to establish a local government – only allows the president to take over the city’s police department for 30 days without approval from Congress, aspects of Trump’s actions are likely to continue past Wednesday. Mayor Muriel Bowser has issued an order for the MPD to coordinate with federal law enforcement to the “maximum extent allowable by law within the District”, and national guard troops reportedly may stay until the end of the year.

Washington DC residents have pushed back against what many call an occupation, which is deeply unpopular in the largely Democratic city. On Saturday, thousands marched from Malcolm X park in Northwest DC to the White House in an event organized by Free DC, a community organization working to protect the city’s Home Rule that has trained thousands of people since 11 August.

“Trump’s crackdown does not create safety, but its opposite,” said Scott Michelman, legal director for the ACLU of DC. “People are scared to go to their jobs, to drop off their kids at school, and to go about their daily lives because of the pervasive law enforcement and military presence that Trump has foisted on this city.”


When Trump first announced the takeover of the local police department, he said cops will be allowed to do “whatever the hell they want”.

Over the last 30 days, offenses that before 11 August would likely not have led to arrest have resulted in criminal charges, and federal law enforcement who have accompanied MPD have used policing tactics, such as car chases, check points, and stop and frisks, that MPD typically avoids and that experts say may violate the US constitution.

“Anyone who has studied the history of policing in this country knows that that type of green light to pursue inchoate hunches, to use force, to stop people at random, falls most heavily on Black and brown people, and we have sadly but predictably seen that play out on the streets of the district,” Michelman said. “We’re deeply concerned that one of the primary effects of Trump’s surge and militarization of law enforcement in DC has been racial profiling.”

While some communities, especially those that suffer from a disproportionate amount of violent crime, have been grateful for additional policing and patrolling, much of the activity has not targeted dangerous criminals.


According to a Reuters analysis of records from Washington’s superior court from halfway through the takeover, the federal agents have been “converging in large numbers on low-level crimes such as marijuana use and public alcohol consumption”. More than half of the cases federal agents were involved in were minor offenses, including misdemeanors and felonies under Washington DC’s code, but not federal felonies.

In the first two weeks, just over 30 cases were filed in federal court for more serious gun and drug-related charges. But many of the charges federal officials have tried to land have not stuck. Grand juries have refused to indict defendants at an unprecedented rate, and judges have also pushed back against the tactics.

“This is perhaps one of the weakest requests for detention I have seen and something that, prior to two weeks ago, would have been unthinkable in this courthouse,” magistrate judge Zia M Faruqui said on 28 August.

Faruqui has also called out police for racial profiling defendants. In one incident, she claimed a Black man was singled out by police because he was carrying a large bag.

“It is without a doubt the most illegal search I’ve even seen in my life,” Faruqui said, according to NPR. “I’m absolutely flabbergasted at what has happened. A high school student would know this was an illegal search.”


Michelman of the ACLU said: “We’ve heard of a sharp uptick in stops that appear to be inexplicable except by the individual’s race or personal appearance.”

Maryland resident Brandon Worthan told the Guardian he was subjected to what he claims was an illegal search when he came to Washington on 27 August.

The 38-year-old was waiting for his girlfriend outside her soon-to-be-opened bar on a quiet stretch of H St Northeast at about 9pm, and said he was speaking to another Black man on the street when roughly 30 to 40 vehicles suddenly pulled up. “Out of nowhere, I just got blitzed,” he said. “All kinds of unmarked police cars, MPD, Secret Service, all kinds of cop cars just pulled up on me and they didn’t ask me any questions.” He said he later saw vests identifying agents with the DEA, FBI, Ice, the US marshal service, and troops in military camo.

According to video from the incident and Worthan’s account, officers grabbed his arms, put him in handcuffs, searched his body, and found a bottle of alcohol in his back pocket. “I wasn’t drinking the bottle,” he said. “I didn’t have it in my hand.”

Full read: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/trump-washington-dc-takeover
 
Well, so much for Trump ignoring cities in red states.

New Orleans and Memphis about to see a massive drop in crime.

But watch as the narrative shifts to “targeting Democrat ran cities with black leadership” effectively abandoning the idea that anything with Republican leadership is a crime ridden shit hole.

They’ll find some place in Wyoming with a population of 500. Where some truck driver from another state got killed in a bar fight by a biker from another and gave this little town a massive murder rate over one murder in a year lol. They really ass pull stats like that sometimes
 
Well, so much for Trump ignoring cities in red states.

New Orleans and Memphis about to see a massive drop in crime.

But watch as the narrative shifts to “targeting Democrat ran cities with black leadership” effectively abandoning the idea that anything with Republican leadership is a crime ridden shit hole.
Now it will just be "targeting black people".
 
Isn't a bit odd that Trump is only targeting cities with a lot of black people? 67% of black males, the vast majority, do NOT have Felony records and yet he targets their communities.
 
My point is conservative is biased towards extreme right wing and moderate conservatives get banned
No doubt, but basically everything else if biased towards the left and you will get banned for even alluding to the fact you're a conservative.

Go on, try it. Go to any non-political sub and say some shit that runs heterodox to general left wing sentiment.

Go to R/sardines and say "man just came back from the Tommy Robinson march and I brought a couple cans of Brunswick sardines for energy. #Winning

Then wait for "You've been permanently banned!" Msg.
 

Leaked plans show Pentagon eyeing Louisiana to deploy national guard​

Documents show intent to deploy 1,000 troops to conduct law enforcement operations in urban centers

Donald Trump’s administration has drafted a proposal to deploy 1,000 Louisiana national guard troops to conduct law enforcement operations in the state’s urban centers, the Washington Post reported Saturday, citing military planning documents it had obtained.

Trump has made crime a major focus of his administration even as violent crime rates have fallen in many US cities. His crackdown on Democratic-led municipalities has fueled legal concerns and spurred protests, including a recent demonstration by several thousand people in Washington DC.

Democratic leaders have said that the massive deployments are more a show of power by Trump rather than a serious effort to fight crime.

More than a dozen residents of Shreveport, Louisiana, told Reuters they viewed any deployment as more of a political stunt than a meaningful crime-fighting solution – and a way for Trump to blunt criticism that he’s only targeting Democratic-controlled states.

Louisiana’s governor, Jeff Landry, is Republican. The mayors of Shreveport and Baton Rouge, two of Louisiana’s most prominent cities, are Republicans. But the mayor of New Orleans, the state’s best-known city, is a Democrat.

A Pentagon spokesperson did not comment in detail on the documents. A spokesperson said: “Leaked documents should not be interpreted as policy. We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise.”

The planning documents, according to the Post, state that the plan would allow the military to supplement law enforcement in cities such as New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Both cities have majority Black populations.

The Pentagon’s plan outlines a mobilization lasting until 30 September 2026, though no start date was specified.

Among the documents is an unsigned, undated draft memo from Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth to US attorney general Pam Bondi and homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, which highlights the “unique advantage” of the military’s proposed approach to law enforcement in Louisiana, according to the Post.

Hinging on a request for troop deployment from Landry, who is a staunch Trump supporter, the proposal has not been confirmed as approved by federal or state officials, according to the Post’s reporting. The Pentagon’s Louisiana plan suggests a robust operation is under consideration, with national guard personnel “supplementing” the law enforcement presence in high-crime neighborhoods. They could also help with drug interdiction and by providing “logistical and communications support” to local authorities, the Washington Post reported.

On Friday, Trump said he would send national guard troops to Memphis, Tennessee.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/13/louisiana-national-guard-pentagon

Those governors as asking for the help




Well, so much for Trump ignoring cities in red states.

New Orleans and Memphis about to see a massive drop in crime.

But watch as the narrative shifts to “targeting Democrat ran cities with black leadership” effectively abandoning the idea that anything with Republican leadership is a crime ridden shit hole.

They’ll find some place in Wyoming with a population of 500. Where some truck driver from another state got killed in a bar fight by a biker from another and gave this little town a massive murder rate over one murder in a year lol. They really ass pull stats like that sometimes

Was always the plan as they have even mentioned they can’t go in without the governor unless it is to protect federal buildings and assets. It will be good optics when minorities in these cities praise the Trump effort. Same thing happened in DC, which was the testing ground, both in terms of logistics, but also optics and politically
 
I think it's more that left wingers are either being dishonest or completely oblivious to how bad it really is and simply pass off their echo chambers as a more balanced arena.


Wanna know what a balanced discussion board looks like? The war room.
Surely you can't be serious. LMAO @ this new angle of trolling. The bias in favour of and against certain users according to their ideological stance is quite evident to anyone who pays enough attention. And guess which "side" is which.
 
Because those are the cities making headlines world wide.
Aren't you one of those saying Americans don't give a fuck what the rest of the world thinks about them?
 
Surely you can't be serious. LMAO @ this new angle of trolling. The bias in favour of and against certain users according to their ideological stance is quite evident to anyone who pays enough attention. And guess which "side" is which.
I think it's pretty evenly moderated here.
 
Back
Top