Crime 58 shot, 8 dead in Chicago over weekend. Trump and governor and mayor clash over threats to send in troops.

Should troops be sent in to Chicago?

  • Yes, send them in.

    Votes: 38 38.8%
  • No, keep troops out of our cities

    Votes: 40 40.8%
  • Let the violence continue unabated

    Votes: 10 10.2%
  • I don’t care about Chicago

    Votes: 10 10.2%

  • Total voters
    98
If you’re referring to the events from 1957 in Little Rock, that was a completely different situation.
Governor Orval Faubus defied a US Supreme Court ruling and Eisenhower was correct to respond by sending in the 101st Airborne.

Interestingly, Eisenhower was a Republican and Faubus was a Democrat. A lot can change over 70 years.

I’m not saying whether Trump is correct or not.

But that situation and this? Apples and bowling balls.

It is ti his post. He made no exception to situation.

They were sent on to enforce the laws.

Trump has the right to send them in to provide protection for federal agents and facilities.

He had a right to send them in in DC. As far as other cities to be used in police help I dont know for sure but i dont think he should unless they ask fo it.
 
It is ti his post. He made no exception to situation.

They were sent on to enforce the laws.

Trump has the right to send them in to provide protection for federal agents and facilities.

He had a right to send them in in DC. As far as other cities to be used in police help I dont know for sure but i dont think he should unless they ask fo it.
What will it solve? Nothing.

DC gets good numbers for a few weeks, then the troops leave and things go back to normal. There's no long term vision. It's all smoke and mirrors.
 
Police Chief from Canadia has these words to instruct victims citizens on his plan.



His "Nine One One" response - that process only Starts after you call. Can ya talk with your home invader right there In your kitchen? After listening to you panicking, the operator then makes decision to respond or not. Then relevant Station is called. After a Police Car is dispatched, hope it doesn't interrupt lunch or break, now getting to...GPS, if the addy is right, cool, we can Start Response Time, measured in Kilometers Per Mile. Traffic? Stop lights or signs ? That is Zero Kilometers traveled in an hour. (Well, maybe the criminal that illegally endangered your family is patient enough to wait.) Back to adding Every Step needed to Even Begin Being Rescued.

Travel Time needs to be added to above call times, the Cop/car/GPS info, much slower Response Time than just being ready as a man to protect his family in his own home.


Placing a loaded Glock 19 in the hand of a Citizen makes Response Time...As It Happens.
 
Police Chief from Canadia has these words to instruct victims citizens on his plan.



His "Nine One One" response - that process only Starts after you call. Can ya talk with your home invader right there In your kitchen? After listening to you panicking, the operator then makes decision to respond or not. Then relevant Station is called. After a Police Car is dispatched, hope it doesn't interrupt lunch or break, now getting to...GPS, if the addy is right, cool, we can Start Response Time, measured in Kilometers Per Mile. Traffic? Stop lights or signs ? That is Zero Kilometers traveled in an hour. (Well, maybe the criminal that illegally endangered your family is patient enough to wait.) Back to adding Every Step needed to Even Begin Being Rescued.

Travel Time needs to be added to above call times, the Cop/car/GPS info, much slower Response Time than just being ready as a man to protect his family in his own home.


Placing a loaded Glock 19 in the hand of a Citizen makes Response Time...As It Happens


The concept that you have no right of self protection in your own home is both a dangerous precedent and insanely idiotic.
The home invader has put himself in that position and everyone in danger in the process.
Just let them take your children while you’re at it you bunch of fucking cowards.
The fact they make sanctuary cities for home invasion is disgusting and irresponsible. It should lead to criminal prosecution of the elected officials making such senseless recommendations to the public.
 
What will it solve? Nothing.

DC gets good numbers for a few weeks, then the troops leave and things go back to normal. There's no long term vision. It's all smoke and mirrors.

I agree with this if they dont have some long term plan.
 
Police Chief from Canadia has these words to instruct victims citizens on his plan.



His "Nine One One" response - that process only Starts after you call. Can ya talk with your home invader right there In your kitchen? After listening to you panicking, the operator then makes decision to respond or not. Then relevant Station is called. After a Police Car is dispatched, hope it doesn't interrupt lunch or break, now getting to...GPS, if the addy is right, cool, we can Start Response Time, measured in Kilometers Per Mile. Traffic? Stop lights or signs ? That is Zero Kilometers traveled in an hour. (Well, maybe the criminal that illegally endangered your family is patient enough to wait.) Back to adding Every Step needed to Even Begin Being Rescued.

Travel Time needs to be added to above call times, the Cop/car/GPS info, much slower Response Time than just being ready as a man to protect his family in his own home.


Placing a loaded Glock 19 in the hand of a Citizen makes Response Time...As It Happens.

He's a fucking idiot. It's box cutter time if a douchebag invades my home. I will never take any chance with my wife's safety. I'll live with the consequences.

Last year, a moron just like him (maybe Toronto cop) wanted people to leave their car keys near their front door so they wouldn't have problems with car thieves.
 
a58h6o.jpg
 
Police Chief from Canadia has these words to instruct victims citizens on his plan.



His "Nine One One" response - that process only Starts after you call. Can ya talk with your home invader right there In your kitchen? After listening to you panicking, the operator then makes decision to respond or not. Then relevant Station is called. After a Police Car is dispatched, hope it doesn't interrupt lunch or break, now getting to...GPS, if the addy is right, cool, we can Start Response Time, measured in Kilometers Per Mile. Traffic? Stop lights or signs ? That is Zero Kilometers traveled in an hour. (Well, maybe the criminal that illegally endangered your family is patient enough to wait.) Back to adding Every Step needed to Even Begin Being Rescued.

Travel Time needs to be added to above call times, the Cop/car/GPS info, much slower Response Time than just being ready as a man to protect his family in his own home.


Placing a loaded Glock 19 in the hand of a Citizen makes Response Time...As It Happens.


When seconds count... help is minutes away... several minutes
 
What will it solve? Nothing.

DC gets good numbers for a few weeks, then the troops leave and things go back to normal. There's no long term vision. It's all smoke and mirrors.
But in Chicago even a month of Troops could mean 200 saved gunshot victims...and a plan could be derived from it eventually. 17 people voted do nothing, or let the violence continue....thats fucked up. If this weren't Trump the numbers would look a lot more favorable.
 
But in Chicago even a month of Troops could mean 200 saved gunshot victims...and a plan could be derived from it eventually. 17 people voted do nothing, or let the violence continue....thats fucked up. If this weren't Trump the numbers would look a lot more favorable.
You save 200 victims in a month, but you change nothing. I'd rather see the President make a change that will save 25 people a month for the next 50 years.
 
You save 200 victims in a month, but you change nothing. I'd rather see the President make a change that will save 25 people a month for the next 50 years.
Its as you said it smoke and mirrors more than likely to distract from the Epstein files

A pattern that works effectively for trump is to yell, "wait, look over there a black/mexican/immigrant/dei / "insert boogie man here/ "


Like when he blamed the DEI for the crash in Potomac. You would think people wouldnt be that dumb, but looking on this forum...


not only that, its pointless.

What is the national guard going to do? Arrest and rehabilitate criminals? Maybe uplift impoverished areas with education and health care while they're at it?
 
You save 200 victims in a month, but you change nothing. I'd rather see the President make a change that will save 25 people a month for the next 50 years.
Agreed, but until then at least stop the bleeding. Unfortunately, this is not a snap the fingers fix. And also, not a fix that the left will like. Soft on crime doesn't fix things with these areas. I watched Rudy Guiliani fix Manhattan and NYC in a few years. He first attacked quality of life crimes, which led to bigger stops. I saw an amazing transformation. Truly amazing. 42nd street was a war zone when I was a kid. It's Disney now. Why anyone would fight being strong on crime when the residents are pleading for help is hard to believe.


 
What will it solve? Nothing.

DC gets good numbers for a few weeks, then the troops leave and things go back to normal. There's no long term vision. It's all smoke and mirrors.
- Theres no easy solutions to complicated matters.
 
On one hand I think Chicago is incredibly underrated as a city and a lot of people would think it was just a hell-hole if they never visited or realized what is really going on there.. it is one of the best cities in the country. 100% truth.

On the other hand, electing such a dumb fuck mayor really makes me think that Chicago is getting a lot of what they deserve as far as hate. The guy sucks and is not doing nearly enough to help in the areas where the city needs it.
 
On one hand I think Chicago is incredibly underrated as a city and a lot of people would think it was just a hell-hole if they never visited or realized what is really going on there.. it is one of the best cities in the country. 100% truth.

On the other hand, electing such a dumb fuck mayor really makes me think that Chicago is getting a lot of what they deserve as far as hate. The guy sucks and is not doing nearly enough to help in the areas where the city needs it.

I'm out in Chicago now for Thanksgiving and the consensus in the various bars and restaraunts last night is that the mayor is a cocksucker and not very well liked by the people. White, black, Hispanic... no one seems to like him.
 
I'm out in Chicago now for Thanksgiving and the consensus in the various bars and restaraunts last night is that the mayor is a cocksucker and not very well liked by the people. White, black, Hispanic... no one seems to like him.

I don’t know how he won. No one seems to like him. Maybe everyone who voted for him now just knows better.
 
While I don’t want to see American troops deployed in our cities, I would argue that the crime and murders are out of control in this city and the state and city leaders aren’t doing shit about it

Compared to what? They don't have the rates of many other metros per 100,000, which Chicago's is around 17.

  • Birmingham, Alabama. 58.8
  • St. Louis, Missouri. 54.1
  • Memphis, Tennessee. 40.6
  • Baltimore, Maryland. 34.8
  • Detroit, Michigan. 31.2
  • Cleveland, Ohio. 30.0
  • Dayton, Ohio. 29.7
  • Kansas City, Missouri. 27.6
  • Shreveport, Louisiana. 26.8
  • Washington, D.C.. 25.5
  • Richmond, Virginia. 24.2
  • South Fulton, Georgia. 22.2
  • Cincinnati, Ohio. 21.8
  • Louisville, Kentucky. 21.7
  • Indianapolis, Indiana. 20.0
  • Oakland, California. 18.6
  • Albuquerque, New Mexico. 18.4
  • Montgomery, Alabama. 18.1
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota. 18.0
  • Lancaster, California. 17.7
  • Little Rock, Arkansas. 17.6
  • Hartford, Connecticut. 17.6
 
Compared to what? They don't have the rates of many other metros per 100,000, which Chicago's is around 17.

  • Birmingham, Alabama. 58.8 - Run by democrat (black male)
  • St. Louis, Missouri. 54.1 - Run by a democrat (white woman)
  • Memphis, Tennessee. 40.6 - Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Baltimore, Maryland. 34.8 - Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Detroit, Michigan. 31.2 - Run by a democrat (white male)
  • Cleveland, Ohio. 30.0 - Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Dayton, Ohio. 29.7 - Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Kansas City, Missouri. 27.6 - Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Shreveport, Louisiana. 26.8 Run by republican (white male)
  • Richmond, Virginia. 24.2 Run by a democrat (indian male)
  • South Fulton, Georgia. 22.2 Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Cincinnati, Ohio. 21.8 Run by a democrat (indian/american male)
  • Louisville, Kentucky. 21.7 Run by a democrat (white male)
  • Indianapolis, Indiana. 20.0 Run by a democrat (white male)
  • Oakland, California. 18.6 Run by a democrat (black woman)
  • Albuquerque, New Mexico. 18.4 Run by a democrat (white male)
  • Montgomery, Alabama. 18.1 Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota. 18.0 Run by a democrat (white male)
  • Lancaster, California. 17.7 Run by a republican (white male)
  • Little Rock, Arkansas. 17.6 Run by a democrat (black male)
  • Hartford, Connecticut. 17.6 Run by a democrat (sri lankan male)

l@nd0

The more you know...


Chicago - Run by a democrat (black male)

(D)o you see any patterns?

Soft on crime dems continuing to make society unsafe for citizens. This much is known. And always has been.
 
l@nd0

The more you know...


Chicago - Run by a democrat (black male)

(D)o you see any patterns?

Soft on crime dems continuing to make society unsafe for citizens. This much is known. And always has been.
lol he took out who was running each city
 
Back
Top