- Joined
- Jan 26, 2017
- Messages
- 24,687
- Reaction score
- 51,942
Nah nah, it's very simple and this time I'm gonna use direct quotes
"MVP and WB? You can make an argument for it" .. because .. "JDM is a not so great fighter because he went to.. a split with Kevin Holland."
See? Two fighters are about the same level because a THIRD fighter didn't win as convincingly against a common opponent of theirs. It's so perfectly reasonable.
There is called being literally incomparable because there is no even ground on which to compare vs metaphorically incomparable because the difference is so obvious that you shouldn't compare them. You failed at both. Here, I'll show you.MVP is up there by happenstance and needs to defend being up there. Wonderboy is up there by proof.
It's so incomparable, the mind boggles to imagine calling them the same
That's your quote. Here's another
And Wonderboy, according to you (because of how well MVP beat Holland or whatever dumbass math you're doing) is equal to MVP. So you see where your pick and choose bullshit falls apart?
It's all nonsense
Pick one and stick with it.
MVP wasn't even the second best guy in a B-tier promotion, so his career and skill level CANNOT be compared with Wonderboy's, a guy who fought his title shot to a draw (and got robbed of the title in the rematch).
MVP's placement in the division can actually be compared, but is so obviously lower that there is no point to arguing it, so it is functionally incomparable.
They are not equal by either merit. I didn't "pick-and choose" either logic. I broke down how BOTH logics SIMULTANEOUSLY come up lacking.
I have crayons if you need this explained further.
You're misrepresenting what I said. I said a minor argument exists for round 2, but that's even smaller than the argument that JDM won round 3 10-8.Great, you might even convince yourself JDM isn't elite and I don't have to do it.
Remember the other day, you told me it's arguable Hafez won the first and second round against JDM? I do.
![]()
What that means, since I didn't think I had to actually explain this, is that the CORRECT score is 29-28 JDM, and that the NEXT best score is 29-27, and that you'd have to stretch reason and logic to ignore the bigger argument that there was literally no way Hafez could win, because of the 10-8, in order to argue that he won 29-28. I was illustrating the point that the argument ONLY exists in bad faith. Which has been your whole thing since you started this argument that JDM winning a fight not as good as you wanted to, invalidates all of his future wins, even when he has the best finish over the best win since then.
It's crybaby bullshit, and I will not be able to get you to see how your bias is unreasonable.