Social Is cancelling over? Trump and Vance support DOGE staffer that quit after past twitter posts revealed

[Rod1]

DACA

DACA was ruled Constitutional by a right leaning court.

 

[Rod1]

loan forgiveness

Loans weren't forgiven.

 

[DoctorTaco]

What’s funny about it?
He has millions and he took a poll about the guy
80% said don’t fire him so he didn’t
You don’t understand the power of X

Are you familiar with the idea of bias?

 

[koquerelle]

Don't forget Canadian with their Aboots.

I've never met a Canadian who talks like that. I've heard a few on videos and that's it.

 

[Kingz]

 

[Kingz]

DACA was ruled Constitutional by a right leaning court.

It wasn’t ruled constitutional. They didn’t rule on the constitutionality of DACA, just that Trump’s rescinding of it was too “arbitrary” and didn’t consider the built “reliance” on the program.

Which was a bullshit ruling because a President should need no “good reason” to rescind an EO via EO. Even constitutional EO’s. Which DACA is not..but that was when the court still had Kennedy and Ginsburg so Roberts was still the kingmaker. But it was basically a stupid humanitarian argument and delay tactic which had no legal basis. They just didn’t want to end the program while also not empowering Executive Orders to become settled law.


They punted the question of whether DACA was constitutional even though it’s beside the point anyway.

If they had ruled it was constitutional. Then that would be that but it wasn’t as the current federal ruling on DACA(as of 2023) is that it is absolutely unconstitutional and the injunction simply doesn’t affect people still in the program until the Supreme Court hears its again..which they are dragging ass on doing.

It did prevent Biden from doing any expansion of DACA despite several efforts.

 

[Rod1]

It wasn’t ruled constitutional. They didn’t rule on the constitutionality of DACA, just that Trump’s rescinding of it was too “arbitrary” and didn’t consider the built “reliance” on the program.

"they didn't ruled it illegal, they just ruled that removing it was illegal".

Do you hear yourself man?

Which was a bullshit ruling because a President should need no “good reason” to rescind an EO via EO. Even constitutional EO’s. Which DACA is not..but that was when the court still had Kennedy and Ginsburg so Roberts was still the kingmaker.

Ok, but you argued that Biden broke the law and ignored the courts, which he didn't.

They punted the question of whether DACA was constitutional even though it’s beside the point anyway.

It is besides the point, because you argue Biden broke the law when he didn't.

If they had ruled it was constitutional. Then that would be that but it wasn’t as the current federal ruling on DACA is that it is absolutely unconstitutional and the injunction simply doesn’t affect people still in the program until the Supreme Court hears its again..which they are dragging ass on doing.

Ok, but so far courts haven't ruled its illegal and there has been several attempts at getting it ruled illegal.

Meanwhile Trump's team is already in contempt.

So your whole "bothsides" is just fallacious, Biden or Obama or w/e, none of them caused a Constitutional crisis and none of them showed so little contempt for Congress and the Courts as Trump's team is doing in less than a month of government.

 

[Kingz]

"they didn't ruled it illegal, they just ruled that removing it was illegal".

Do you hear yourself man?


Ok, but you argued that Biden broke the law and ignored the courts, which he didn't.


It is besides the point, because you argue Biden broke the law when he didn't.



Ok, but so far courts haven't ruled its illegal and there has been several attempts at getting it ruled illegal.

Meanwhile Trump's team is already in contempt.

So your whole "bothsides" is just fallacious, Biden or Obama or w/e, none of them caused a Constitutional crisis and none of them showed so little contempt for Congress and the Courts as Trump's team is doing in less than a month of government.

What are you talking about? I didn’t say Biden ignored the courts. I’m not the same person you were arguing with earlier in the thread. I saw your post saying that DACA was ruled constitutional. That is false.


if the Supreme Court ruled DACA as constitutional then there is no way it would be back up to the Supreme Court awaiting a hearing as it is today…and Biden would’ve been able to expand it when he wanted to.

If the Supreme Court rules that something is constitutional. A lower court can’t rule it as unconstitutional starting the process again.

They also didn’t say what Trump did was illegal. Read John Roberts opinion. It was more or less “This is mean. Won’t you think of the poor dreamers? We don’t like how you went about this. Go through the process again”. Which was bullshit and won’t be repeated whenever they decide to hear it again.

They’ll likely just let the lower court ruling that DACA is unconstitutional stand since nobody really gives a shit about the dreamers anymore. As long as it can’t be done again

 

[ChosenOne]

A doge staffer quite after some journalist found some of his old tweets. Guy is like 24 years old now.
...

This thread is hillarious in its absurdity.

Trump is on a rampage to cancel most of the progress of the last decades.

Do you support anything to do with DEI? Trump wants you outed, fired, all your work taken down and you cancelled.

Are you in the Military, FBI, Policing or anywhere in gov't and dare to speak up about the crimes of Jan 6th... Trump wants you cancelled and fired.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Pride Month, Holocaust Days of Remembrance , etc, etc... cancelled, cancelled, cancelled.


The US has never had a time where cancel culture was more embraced and celebrated that right now.

TS next thread : Does anyone support the Blue more than Trump? As Trump purges the FBI and denigrates the Capital police.

Pure idiotic trolling by TS.

 

[Rod1]

What are you talking about? I didn’t say Biden ignored the courts

You said Biden's presidency broke the law the same way Trump is doing which is false.

Trump's actions have not been seen since Nixon.

 

[Kingz]

You said Biden's presidency broke the law the same way Trump is doing which is false.

Trump's actions have not been seen since Nixon.

I reject the wording of that as Trump isn’t breaking the law.

But where did I say Biden broke the law or ignored court rulings?

 

[DoctorTaco]

I reject the wording of that as Trump isn’t breaking the law.

USAID was established as an independent entity in a law passed by Congress in 1998. Congress could shut it down or move it, but a roving billionaire adviser to the president cannot.

there was the move to freeze all federal grants and loans across the government, about $1 trillion worth. An uproar ensued, the opposition party finally woke up, and judges began to rule. Trump backed down.

This too was a massive legal and constitutional breach. Under the Constitution, Congress has “the power of the purse.” It appropriates the money for the activities of the federal government. Presidents cannot just decide to put an indefinite blanket freeze on spending or refuse to spend money on this or that without involving Congress.

Presidents from both parties have at times refused to spend funds, but Richard Nixon abused this power, as he did so many others on his way to resignation. Congress passed the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to curb the practice. Under the law, presidents must notify Capitol Hill of their intent to hold on to allocated funds. Congress can accept or reject this proposal, and if it does not act within a certain amount of time, the money must be released.