Nothing was proven.
Because it's all political!!! They're after TR7MP because they're all corrupt and he was trying to clean up the Swamp!!!
Because they didn't run against the establishment jeff
Fraudulent business practices?
Man, I really gave too much credit to the larping army of brainwashed leftists who believe political hit jobs should supersede law and order.
I have no doubts banking and real estate are other topics you know nothing about, but this has less merit than any of the last attempts by the Democrat Reich to eliminate Orange Man. Trump’s businesses acted no different than 100% (yes, all) of the industry. Just like homeowners believe their homes are worth FMV or more, the banks ultimately determine the value you can borrow against. This prosecutor should be disbarred immediately and investigated for the egregiousness of this political diversion.
The scary part is your inability to view any issue through an unfiltered, blue-free lens…
Trump was not against the establishment, he was against anyone not blindly loyal to Trump.
I wonder how much time he’s going to serve from this … oh wait
The half of what your stating here thats not a misrepresentation is just a describing a politician who is not being a liberal. There's a reason he split the Republican party in two, Like him or Hate him. His foreign policy challenged the pre-conceived norm by reaching out to adversaries and not starting additional wars, he pulled out of the paris accord and tried to get the EU to pay its fair share. He even referenced the military industrial complex, which would have been a death sentence for any other super pac republican. I could go on, from the second he stepped into the white house, the man had enemies on both sides
What i stated was facts. You didn´t refute a single one. Are you saying those were not all extremely GOP establishment things or that only liberals can be establishment?
Both liberals and conservatives can be part of the established order. With the men and woman who have been there the longest playing thier respective roles. I'm not even saying I agree with every trump policy decision, but there's no way he ordered more drones strikes than obama. Or was simply "Sucking up to dicators" or "kissing israel's ass" and other misrepresentations. His rhetoric alone is enough to classify him outside the established rebublican order. Now certainly, weapons sells continued. He still had an active presence in iraq and Afghanistan, but it had been reduced to bare bones, and he pulled out of Syria. And he criticized the MIH and clearly carried a more isolationist attitude overall. Once again, im not stating everything was a "win" but counting him as part of the establishment for just for being pro capitalism, is absurd to me. By the way, I count Bernie sanders on the other side as anti establishment
Numbers on the drone strikes (wich he also removed oversight from)
chicago.suntimes.com
How is that kissing ass? He moved an embassy. He's not aiding the israeli admin thats laying waste to gaza as we speak. And let me dig into the drones, the article may be correct, may not beNumbers on the drone strikes (wich he also removed oversight from)
Moving the US embassy in Israel was certainly kissing Israeli ass.Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama's numbers
Trump has escalated the number of U.S. drone strikes overseas, and made the program even more secretive.
Misrepresented, "thosands more" and something like the Obama increase during the surge are two different things. Both situational, both your use here to draw him as a warmonger for handling the last of Isis is misrepresented
Misrepresentation, are you trying to say he sold these weapons to terrorists? Or rather to counter them? Once again, weapons sales are just sales. They aren't the same as starting a new war or using our tax dollers to buy them on behalf of somebody else that not even in Nato.
I'm just pointing out that he's not part of the establishment, I voted 3rd party. You seem to believe that he needs to be Bernie Sanders to be considered outside of the establishment on the right or left, and that this idea is singular.
Not really at all, some decisions are just decisions a US president has to make. It doesn't mean the deep state has his back or something. They all clearly hate him, Bush family, Clinton, etc
I'm sorry I didn't bring up every policy decision that fits into your liberal view of what anti establishment is so we can try to make the ridiculous claim that Trump is establishment. His not perfectly anti establishment, but certainly not part of the established order. If you lost respect for somebody on a karate forum for that, well, that says a lot more about you than it does me
The increase in drone strikes is common knowledge and widely reported on.
owned
