- Joined
- Mar 16, 2024
- Messages
- 589
- Reaction score
- 885
It's hosted by Moicano and Burns. They are funny as fuck while also being able to break down fights fairly.I just watched a little to see what Usman had to say. Those 2 seriously shouldn't be podcasting. Lol, will check out the one you mentioned.
That's not an "asterisk," that's just called losingAgree with him but Usman's 0-3 has asterisks against it. He was highly competitive in all three losses.
Because how you win doesn't matter and your decisions were jokes? JDM should have took all 3 rounds over Holland. You could maybe give Kevin round 2, but consistently terrible judge Michael Bell gave Holland round 1 as well, which was a joke. And Haffez only took round 1. There is minor argument he took round 2, but an even bigger argument that JDM got a 10-8 round 3.Why do people keep insisting JDM is close to a title shot? He's had two split decisions in his last 3. One over Kevin Holland (not that terrible) and the other he went to a split a year ago with the #60 ranked WW. If you can't decisively beat the #60 guy you have no business in a title fight.
If you give Hafez rounds 1 and 2 and JDM a round 10-8 round 3 that's a draw. That's a draw over the #60 ranked WW. Not decisive. Shavkat wouldn't have a problem beating the #60 ranked WW. Usman wouldn't have a problem beating the #60 ranked WW. Garry wouldn't have a problem beating the #60 ranked WW. JDM is going to catch a loss here soon enough. The guy is not champion caliber.Because how you win doesn't matter and your decisions were jokes? JDM should have took all 3 rounds over Holland. You could maybe give Kevin round 2, but consistently terrible judge Michael Bell gave Holland round 1 as well, which was a joke. And Haffez only took round 1. There is minor argument he took round 2, but an even bigger argument that JDM got a 10-8 round 3.
If someone thinks those fights weren't decisive, they have no business analyzing fights