Media Pimblett Goes off on Helwani in Interview with Dana White (UPDATE: Helwani Responds).

What the fuck are you babbling about? Are you five years old? No one is paying fighters for them to come on and plug themselves. That's not how things work. Dana underpaying his employees is an entirely separate issue.































































































































































































































































Get a hold of yourself and pull your head out of your ass. Pimplett is obviously in the wrong here. He asked to come on the show and had been on many times before. Him playing a victim like a complete bitch is hilarious.

Oh you know both create media to make money by having fighters on, to obfuscate the point you're resorting to name calling. UFC can use same line of logic and saya they are providing a service fighters can promote themselves.
 
Oh you know both create media to make money by having fighters on, to obfuscate the point you're resorting to name calling. UFC can use same line of logic and saya they are providing a service fighters can promote themselves.

You being a bellend isn't going to help you. The UFC employs the fighters, Ariel does not.

But since you think journalists should pay people to be interviewed, give an example of any MMA journalist that pays 18% of their revenue to their interviewees, especially when they themselves make zero money from the interview.

This should be good. Have at it Can896.

<36>
 
How the fuck does Paddy go off on Ariel when hes got the king of squelchers rught in front of him? Thats the part I dont getj
 
You being a bellend isn't going to help you. The UFC employs the fighters, Ariel does not.































































But since you think journalists should pay people to be interviewed, give an example of any MMA journalist that pays 18% of their revenue to their interviewees, especially when they themselves make zero money from the interview.































































This should be good. Have at it Can896.
















































Just find it ironic how the top mma journalist pays fighters nothing, criticizes the fighters not getting paid the most. It's really not deeper than that. Both ufc and ariel make their money off having fighters on their show.
 
Just find it ironic how the top mma journalist pays fighters nothing, criticizes the fighters not getting paid the most. It's really not deeper than that. Both ufc and ariel make their money off having fighters on their show.
Those are NOTHING the same, at all. I can't believe you're buying this nonsense.
 
Just find it ironic how the top mma journalist pays fighters nothing, criticizes the fighters not getting paid the most. It's really not deeper than that. Both ufc and ariel make their money off having fighters on their show.

It's not ironic because that's not how it works. Pimplett benefits from the exposure. No decent journalist is paying people. Pimplett asked to be on the show and he'd been on many times. The fault here is entirely his.

You might as well complain about the sun not rising at the exact time you want. That's how much sense you're making. Anyways, you're a waste of time and a bit of a twit.
 
Those are NOTHING the same, at all. I can't believe you're buying this nonsense.



Hmmm... audience watches a show, show gets paid from how many watch, show features fighters with either Dana/Ariel as the hosts. Yeah I get it's a different scale and ones a sport the other is entertainment, but not sure why a show like Ariels pays nothing. Also I don't care about how it's not expected, it's still the idea Ariel is still making like 500k a year, so the money is coming in from the show.
 
Just find it ironic how the top mma journalist pays fighters nothing, criticizes the fighters not getting paid the most. It's really not deeper than that. Both ufc and ariel make their money off having fighters on their show.
Do you really not get this, or are you just fucking with @Sweater of AV at this point?
 
It's not ironic because that's not how it works. Pimplett benefits from the exposure. No decent journalist is paying people. Pimplett asked to be on the show and he'd been on many times. The fault here is entirely his.



You might as well complain about the sun not rising at the exact time you want. That's how much sense you're making. Anyways, you're a waste of time and a bit of a twit.

But what about when it's the opposite. Mayweather or Conor? So only they should be paid for going on Ariels show? Cause they probably bring more people than the show will bring them. Same logic could be applied to UFC, if UFC doesn't get money from lower guys, they shouldn't be paid because they are getting massive exposure.
 
Hmmm... audience watches a show, show gets paid from how many watch, show features fighters with either Dana/Ariel as the hosts. Yeah I get it's a different scale and ones a sport the other is entertainment, but not sure why a show like Ariels pays nothing. Also I don't care about how it's not expected, it's still the idea Ariel is still making like 500k a year, so the money is coming in from the show.
Jesus christ, you really are this dense. I thought you were just trolling before.
 
Do you really not get this, or are you just fucking with @Sweater of AV at this point?

I get that journalists don't pay guests. Now that is tradition or whatever, but I don't understand why a business that relies on guests shouldn't pay. Even if it's relative to the scale of operation. There would be 1/2 the viewers if it was Ariel commentary/analysis and no guests. Usually dude gets the ppv line up right after the ppv. Nice AV, huge fan of zappa
 
Back
Top