- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Messages
- 37,640
- Reaction score
- 51,013
liberal twitter right now is like : Reminder: If you spread this fake Biden story you are colluding with the Russians and likely committing TREASON.
Lets say that Mike Pence has a son that is a lobbyist for a concentration camp for gays. This concentration camp for gays pays Mike Pence's son millions for access to Mike Pence. Then, one day, Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump get together and pass a bill that will send all gay people to concentration camps, and they will have Mike Pence personally drive the train. Mike Pence wasn't the one who made the decision...it was the Senate and Trump. But do you see how this is still a quid-pro-quo situation? Mike Pence's son is being paid for lobbying efforts at the same time Mike Pence is near to all the decision makers.
Guiliani didn’t steal anything .. you think Edward Snowden should be in jail ?Is that a "yes" or a "no" to my question about whether you think that stealing computers and publishing photos from them is OK? Should Guiliani be in jail?
Guiliani didn’t steal anything .. you think Edward Snowden should be in jail ?
liberal twitter right now is like : Reminder: If you spread this fake Biden story you are colluding with the Russians and likely committing TREASON.
OK, so you're just not going to answer the questions, I guess.
I think we can probably take that to mean that you think that stealing computers (and hacking, probably) is good if it helps your party, not otherwise.
lol at stealing... I can totally see early onset dementia Hunter Biden dropping off a computer to get repaired and never coming back to pick it up.
Soo... You're not going to argue the merits of what was on the computer and instead focus on how they got it?
Tell you what, it's much more tangible than relying on the hordes of Anonymous sources that seem to crop up weekly to go after Trump. You don't have a problem with that... lol
what if the video clip is with a minor and is 12:33 minutes long?The fact that Hunter Biden has had trouble with drugs and has sex are not exactly newsworthy. The fact that Guiliani is passing around a stolen laptop seems like a pretty big story.
what if the video clip is with a minor and is 12:33 minutes long?
The fact that Hunter Biden has had trouble with drugs and has sex are not exactly newsworthy. The fact that Guiliani is passing around a stolen laptop seems like a pretty big story.
Lol at Jack spewing the stolen laptop bullshit narrative
The fact that Hunter Biden has had trouble with drugs and has sex are not exactly newsworthy. The fact that Guiliani is passing around a stolen laptop seems like a pretty big story.
lol... Not Newsworthy I guess... Hunter's issues with drugs and hookers seem to be least of Daddy Joe's worries with his fuck up son. And I probably would have had some fun with a more than a few women and some drugs (not meth or crack...lol)... But I wouldn't have left evidence of the shit on a company laptop.
"We don't want to publish this because it is rude" is generally a valid reason.So that’s the protection platforms enjoy thst a publisher doesn’t.
however if they start removing content for no valid reason, they’re no longer just a platform, but a editorial
also still don’t see how suppression of speech is “free speech”?
This is correct.If you read carefully, it does.
It seems you got this backwards
a publisher has a right to free speech, but like I said earlier if a publisher calls you a serial rapist, you can sue them, even if it their “fee speech”. You can’t force them to say something they don’t want, but that also means they can’t say whatever they want without liability.
On the other hand you can’t sue a platform cause someone accused you of being a serial rapist on it or shared an article where you were accused of being serial rapist.
This is not. There are only two circumstances 230c protection is removed, and even then the protection is only stripped for the circumstances warranting removal. The first is if they make the speech themselves, rather than just publish the speech of another. Dorsey and twitter can be sued for their tweets, not for the tweets of another.If a platform starts removing content that doesn’t violate their policies they’re acting more like an editorial, which would remove their 230 protection
No one stole a computer it was turned in to a computer shop that I don’t stealing i have asked you question since my first post and you have not answered you must be learning from Biden lolOK, so you're just not going to answer the questions, I guess.
I think we can probably take that to mean that you think that stealing computers (and hacking, probably) is good if it helps your party, not otherwise.