Elections Kamala Harris Vs. Donald Trump Debate Set For September 10th

they still can’t get a fix on Kamala yet, very unorthodox…like a Keith Jardine.

And then you have trump, typical lay and pray vibes..

I always thought Trump was more like Conor... ;)
 
I'm not disagreeing, but prosecuters work in a very structured enviroment. Everyone involved has to follow strict rules, with severe penalties if they break them.

No defence attorny is going to call Harris a whore. Trump might. She hasn't experienced anything like the level of aggression Trump will bring to the table. That's not entirely a bad thing, of course. She can use it against him. But she might have to eat some punches before she can rope-a-dope Donald.
Female prosecutors do get called whores and worse in their cases, both inside and outside courts. But i get your point. I just don't think he will get her to react. I think the opposite, and she might appear too sedate when people want to see her get mad and fight back. But we will see. We... will.. see...
 
Female prosecutors do get called whores and worse in their cases, both inside and outside courts. But i get your point. I just don't think he will get her to react. I think the opposite, and she might appear too sedate when people want to see her get mad and fight back. But we will see. We... will.. see...

Really? Anyone who used that kind of language to a prosecuter in a British court would be charged with Contempt of Court. Which can lead to a prison sentence. UK judges take a very dim view of that sort of conduct.
 
Really? Anyone who used that kind of language to a prosecuter in a British court would be charged with Contempt of Court. Which can lead to a prison sentence. UK judges take a very dim view of that sort of conduct.
Yup. Trust me.

The guy who did this...

8bdwmq.gif


Is not concerned about also getting charged with contempt of Court as he curses at the judge and prosecutor. Many who do it, get dragged out of court, sanctioned and receive additional charges, but as a Prosecutor or judge it is certainly not uncommon, even if it is rare.
 
It's morning down here and I'm working from home, can't wait for this debate, gonna be a car crash no doubt
 
More like Sonnen to me. Another fucking criminal who liked to run his mouth.
TDS is more like it. Trump could crush it tonight and you’ll come up with some delusional excuse as to why he did poorly.
 
I enjoyed how under Trump's thin skin Kamala got when she said that his rallies were boring and people just leave early and Trump's tax plan would increase the cost of goods by 20%. She was playing the same game that he plays of just exaggerating shit but she got under his skin. She only did it a few times but it was funny how poorly he could handle his own nonsense.
 
Well what's the consensus on the debate? Did trump stick to policy? Who had the better showing?
 
Well what's the consensus on the debate? Did trump stick to policy? Who had the better showing?
There was always going to be two consensus.

The Fox News, Magat media one, which could be written last week stating both that Trump won but also Harris and ABC cheated.

And then the rest of the media world, which is a post debate analysis which in near, if not total consensus says elements of 'Harris did her job and showed just how unhinged, delusional, demented Trump was, while making him repeat his torrent of lies for the independent and never Trump republicans to see'.
 
Kamala manages to still look clueless during a pre-taped fluff piece with no hard questions, and people think she's all of a sudden going to wipe the floor with Trump? Kamala is in way over her heels here.
now its over, thoughts?
 
I think you're underestimating how hilariously real TDS is. They all said Biden was going "destroy" Trump in their debate, and 1/3 of respondents STILL said Biden won even after the debate was such a thorough beating that his own party pulled him out of the race.



cnn-ss.jpg

In the first presidential debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump, The Washington Post tried something new: We asked a group of uncommitted, swing-state voters in real time about their reactions to Tuesday’s debate.

They thought Harris performed better, regardless of how they plan to vote in November.
Among 12 voters who said they would “probably” back her before the debate, five shifted to “definitely” voting for her and the rest said they still lean toward her. Among the nine voters who leaned toward Trump and answered the post-debate question, none shifted to definitely supporting him. Two said they will probably vote for Harris and one plans to vote for a third party.
 
Last edited:
Trump is so easily manipulated. That Trump has a shot at winning shows how easily manipulated the citizenry of said country have likewise become. If he should somehow win, the US's stock the world over is going to collapse into the basement, because no one thinks highly of him or respects him. The most surefire way to destroy the US without firing a shot would be to put the likes of Trump in office.
 
Back
Top