Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

[Joe]

Tulsa gone woke SMH

 

[Confucamus]

Pouring in ..

A good drinking game is to take a shot every time Walz steps in to save her when she's stumbling through some word salad answer. The twist here is that Kamala will be playing the game too during the interview.

 

[ShadowRun]

A good drinking game is to take a shot every time Walz steps in to save her when she's stumbling through some word salad answer. The twist here is that Kamala will be playing the game too during the interview.

Lol true, funny because he can't. He's the definition of the stupid white husband from every 90's sitcom. Fumbles around and let females run his life.

 

[terrapin]

"What kind of president will you be if you can't sit down to do an interview without your running mate?"

That is a great question.

Forget the people running her campaign, she's the one who would be president. Is she that afraid of saying something dumb?

Wait so now all the sudden vice presidents don't have a role??? because you can't have it both ways. Either they do nothing or they're responsible for everything. Which one is it??

You guys flip flop your positions moment to moment these days I've noticed. Isn't Kamala responsible for everything Biden did or has that passed now?? I can't keep your lies straight anymore.

LOL.

 

[terrapin]

Cause I don't suckle at the teat of the democrats who installed a candidate with zero primary votes in two election cycles.

That wasn't an attack. It was a genuine take based on your posts. I'm actually very confused. I don't think I've ever heard you defend or argue for a single Democrat policy.

I'm also pretty bipartisan and not prone to tribal thinking and get a lot of hate on here from Democrats because of it but with you I've just never seen you take the other side in any meaningful way.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

"What kind of president will you be if you can't sit down to do an interview without your running mate?"

That is a great question.

Forget the people running her campaign, she's the one who would be president. Is she that afraid of saying something dumb?

Plus prerecorded, which means they can edit it.

 

[nostradumbass]

Wait so now all the sudden vice presidents don't have a role??? because you can't have it both ways. Either they do nothing or they're responsible for everything. Which one is it??

You guys flip flop your positions moment to moment these days I've noticed. Isn't Kamala responsible for everything Biden did or has that passed now?? I can't keep your lies straight anymore.

LOL.

What are you talking about? You think they're either in charge of everything or nothing? That's a you thing if you can't wrap your head around the VP having varying degrees of responsibility based on the administration. Dick Cheney was also a much more active VP than Biden under Obama's, or Pence under Trump.

In Harris' case, the president you voted for, under whom she's VP, has brutal dementia, so she has been responsible for a lot more than most. Not to mention the senate is split and she was the tiebreaking vote for things like the green leap forward that printed piles of cash and was a hige contributor to massive inflation. She was also the border czar overseeing the border crisis, head of the national space council when we now have astronauts stuck in space.

Calling yourself "pretty bipartisan and not prone to tribal thinking" is a little silly while you're griping at a guy for not being partisan enough. You can check that guy's threads and they're all complaining about republicans, including the one last week criticizing JD Vance, but you're mad that he's not on the "vote blue no matter who" train because of course you are yourself a hard partisan. The only criticisms you pretend to have are the tranny stuff, but obviously that's perfectly hollow and you'll turn right around and call one of the biggest transing kids governors in the country "the greatest politician of my generation".

 

[terrapin]

What are you talking about? You think they're either in charge of everything or nothing? That's a you thing if you can't wrap your head around the VP having varying degrees of responsibility based on the administration. Dick Cheney was also a much more active VP than Biden under Obama's, or Pence under Trump.

In Harris' case, the president you voted for, under whom she's VP, has brutal dementia, so she has been responsible for a lot more than most. Not to mention the senate is split and she was the tiebreaking vote for things like the green leap forward that printed piles of cash and was a hige contributor to massive inflation. She was also the border czar overseeing the border crisis, head of the national space council when we now have astronauts stuck in space.

Calling yourself "pretty bipartisan and not prone to tribal thinking" is a little silly while you're griping at a guy for not being partisan enough. You can check that guy's threads and they're all complaining about republicans, including the one last week criticizing JD Vance, but you're mad that he's not on the "vote blue no matter who" train because of course you are yourself a hard partisan. The only criticisms you pretend to have are the tranny stuff, but obviously that's perfectly hollow and you'll turn right around and call one of the biggest transing kids governors in the country "the greatest politician of my generation".

No, I don't think the vice president's responsible for everything or nothing. It's just that right wingers on this site have been blaming kamala for everything Biden did, so they're the ones who've said the vice president is responsible for everything and now all the sudden in the post I responded to the vice president has no role whatsoever.

It's almost like a lot of these guys have no principles at all and just argue whatever is convenient in whatever moment that it's convenient.

And you pretending I'm not a bipartisan type of guy? It's just hilarious. I have enemies everywhere and very few friends because of it and it's commonly known. So don't be a dumbass.

 

[Andy Capp]

Zero, friend.

Unless you do care about Canadian politicians having integrity.

Why is it funny that she refuses to give access to the press?

That's one. I've been calling for Trudeau to step down for quite a long while. Keep going; you can find more; I'm sure you can do it. Funny of you to complain about lack of integrity in a post based in lies though.

As far as access to the press is concerned, I can think of several reasons and once again the only people who seem to care about this would never vote for her anyway, and that raises it from simply dumb to hilariously stupid.

Mainly, she doesn't need to. What good does it do her campaign? If she gets favourable coverage she's preaching to the choir, pretty much. If she gaffs, she's doing herself more harm than good. There's too much risk and not enough reward.

Also, if I were her, as incumbent VP campaigning for herself and Biden, I think it's a fair bet she wasn't as plugged into the political machine as might have been wise and that cost her a lot of time getting up to speed when Biden stepped down.

On top of that I imagine there's a lot to learn. Between campaigning and learning as much as she can from Biden and anyone else who can contribute, her time must be limited. So, it's an easy thing to permit to lie fallow.

That's just off the top of my head. Political pragmatism is the game that's going to win the White House for the Democrats in November, I think. Trump has really brought them together as a unified force and Harris will be the beneficiary, although it would have been any other person Biden chose as VP back in 2019 or whenever.

There's no need for Harris deliberately increase her opportunities to fuck up.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Mainly, she doesn't need to. What good does it do her campaign?

I already said it’s smart politically.

You’re really of the belief that a person running for the presidency of the united states doesn’t need to give access to the press? What are we? The USSR?

 

[Islam Imamate]

I already said it’s smart politically.

You’re really of the belief that a person running for the presidency of the united states doesn’t need to give access to the press? What are we? The USSR?

Communism is when no speak to press.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Communism is when no speak to press.

I am also curious why you, who said you don’t necessarily care for Harris, are also laughing at the idea of her giving no interviews when she’s seeking the presidency.

 

[rearnakedchoke]

lol. Who is writing these? That looks like Elon took control of community notes and wrote that himself. Loose. Too funny.

 

[Islam Imamate]

I am also curious why you, who said you don’t necessarily care for Harris, are also laughing at the idea of her giving no interviews when she’s seeking the presidency.

Because I think you're nitpicking and its not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things. I also think its fits a wider pattern of posting from you where you nitpick the Democrats while making excuses for Trump and the GOP despite ostensibly not supporting them.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Because I think you're nitpicking and its not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things. I also think its fits a wider pattern of posting from you where you nitpick the Democrats while making excuses for Trump and the GOP despite ostensibly not supporting them.

Nitpicking —nitpicking that the VP of the “most transparent administration in US history” (the one who also doesn’t meet with the press) who is running to be president in an UNPRECEDENTED manner can’t do a press conference.

My goodness.

Trump is an asshole felon who shouldn’t be allowed to run for president. Who is even making excuses for him?! Not me!

 

[Islam Imamate]

Nitpicking —nitpicking that the VP of the “most transparent administration in US history” (the one who also doesn’t meet with the press) who is running to be president in an UNPRECEDENTED manner can’t do a press conference.

My goodness.

Trump is an asshole felon who shouldn’t be allowed to run for president. Who is even making excuses for him?! Not me!

Yes nitpicking, candidates should interact with the press just as a matter of decorum and tradition but all things considered its a very minor detail in the campaign for me when the candidate for the other party attempted a coup after losing the last election.

 

[filthybliss]

Do you guys have "independent thought" alarms that tell you to attack people for not being lead like a dog by establishment dems?

Trump could streak in the middle of a mall and you’ll still support him or find a way to blame “duh media”. So miss me with that bullshit

 

[White Whale]

Kamala Harris did not get a bump from the DNC.

Kamala Harris "honeymoon" continues but no DNC bump: poll

The vice president maintains a four-point lead over Donald Trump following her party convention speech in Chicago.

www.newsweek.com

Vice President Kamala Harris is still enjoying a "honeymoon" period in the 2024 election, despite not increasing her lead over Donald Trump in the wake of speech at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.

A Morning Consult survey of 7,818 registered voters conducted in the days after Harris spoke in Chicago showed the Democrat with a four-point lead over Trump [48 percent to 44].

While the four-point margin is still the joint largest lead Harris has enjoyed over Trump since she entered the 2024 race after President Joe Biden ended his reelection campaign, there was not a boost in Morning Consult polls for Harris following her DNC speech on August 22.

However, the survey shows that the "media honeymoon" continues for Harris, with more voters [47 percent] once again saying they have heard mainly positive news stories about the vice president over the past week, compared to 32 percent who said they have heard mainly negative stories about her.

Not getting a boost at the DNC is not a good sign for the Kamala Harris campaign. It shows she didn't win anyone over.

 

[nostradumbass]

No, I don't think the vice president's responsible for everything or nothing. It's just that right. Wingers on this site have been blaming kamala, for everything Biden did, so they're the ones who've said the vice president is responsible for everything and now all the sudden in the post I responded to the vice president has no role whatsoever.

It's almost like a lot of these guys have no principles at all and just argue whatever is convenient in whatever moment that it's convenient.

And you pretending I'm not a bipartisan type of guy? It's just hilarious. I have enemies everywhere and very few friends because of it and it's commonly known. So don't be a dumbass.

That isn't close to what you responded to. You responded to her being unwilling or unable to do a simple interview without him, and did a gymnastics routine out of pure partisanship and pretended the VP having any responsibilities at all somehow makes her unable to answer any questions without him.

This isn't a vacuum, there is an opposing campaign going on right now, and an entire history of multiple presidential campaigns every 4 years. The presidential candidate and running mate have a few rallies together, almost all of their interviews are separate, and people care more about the person running for president than they do about the running mate. What percent of people who voted for Hillary could name off the top of their head her running mate and what his job was? Obviously you'd all just open another window to look it up and pretend you knew it the whole time, but you know you didn't.

Why don't YOU answer your own question? Is the VP such a major player that the current VP owns the failures of this administration, or are they just a side character, in which case there is absolutely 0 reason she can't do an interview by herself?

 

[Rob Battisti]

Yes nitpicking, candidates should interact with the press just as a matter of decorum and tradition but all things considered its a very minor detail in the campaign for me when the candidate for the other party attempted a coup after losing the last election.

Sure — Trump bad. You mentioned it.