News Judge orders Mcgregor to destroy cctv footage in Nikita hand case; US company reviews evidence refuses to terminated sponsorship of Mcgregor

[flowoftruth]

FYI - the us company is tidl sport and mcgregor is a co-founder of it

 

[Only Here for Attachments]

I had to google that but it sounds like the British version of Shark Tank.

It's much better than Shark Tank, especially the Canadian version.

 

[Siver!]

FYI - the us company is tidl sport and mcgregor is a co-founder of it

Great to hear Conor stuck with Conor through thick and thin

 

[ocfightfan]

Courts should be about upholding the law and not going after people you dislike. They should so not be considering things outside their jurisdiction or the case in question, like some strange sense of cosmic justice. You are there for how the law applies to the facts of the case before you. Not balancing some divine scales because you think a guy is an asshole outside the case.

 

[agibmxmma]

Yeah, clearly that woman wanted to be beat so bad that it was amongst the worst cases that trauma nurses have ever seen in their life. I can't believe there are still people so confidently and quickly running to the defense of a rapist just because "everything is a conspiracy and corruption, blah blah!!! Women evil gold diggers! blahblah"

The "she was in it for the money" angle has been debunked numerous times and makes no sense if you have basic thinking abilities. So much angry incel energy on sherdog that it is ridiculous.

The same people still root for Mike Tyson and mourn over Kobe Bryant.. two other pieces of shyt.

 

[Iroh]

I don’t think you read what I said, I merely said the standards of proof for conviction in accordance with US law and somehow that seems to have triggered you.

I didn’t state anything that I don’t think was just straight up factual. I didn’t even say Conor shouldn’t have been found guilty in the civil trial, I just stated what it all means.

It is factually ingenuine to say he did rape Nikitia hand though because he was found guilty of it in a civil case.

It is factually accurate to state a jury found him 51% likely to have done the accusations levied against him. Anymore or any less is inaccurate and speculative opinion.

He wasn't found guilty though , he was found liable.