I think being found guilty in civil court makes sense. Something terrible happened to this woman, and Conor admits having sex with her so he's the obvious culprit. He had the means and opportunity.
But we have to be honest, too. She was a complete danger slut that was being passed around by Conor and his mates. That isnt to say she deserved what happened, but if it came out tomorrow that Conor Mate #4 also banged her while she was drugged up, and he was the one that got violent with her, there'd be zero shock from me.
Like I said, Conor admits having sex with her her, so he's there and had the opportunity to do it. But im not gonna pretend for one second that this girls story doesn't have lots of holes in it, but the evidence does suggest that someone was violent with her, and Conor is the closest target. Given the evidence he makes the most sense, but its by no means some sort of slam dunk. Civil burden? Yeah, he meets that level. If it were a criminal trial? I'd vote not guilty, but I wouldn't feel good about it.
But the idea she's some 'pass around slut' is not proven in any way.
James, Conor's mate said he had sex with her...
Even though she says he didn't. And there's no evidence of his DNA on or anywhere near her.
More strangely,
James offered himself up - went to the police station to state this, and the police were confused by it.
This was after Conor's interview, whereby a cop apparently said... AFTER Conor was shown the bruises (aka undeniable evidence of his violent work), Conor was like 'she also had sex with James' or something. Or tried to implicate him...
I think it's quite obvious from this Conor is a fkn snake and just implicated him by threat/coercion and James went and put himself in the line of fire, on the proviso 'they both get off' by implying she was just sleeping around and 'it wasn't them', which is fkn ridiculous and how a 10 yr old thinks, but it's the best Conor thought of.
ONLY Conor's DNA was found in and on her.
If James had sex with her... where tf is his DNA.
You have a bruised & battered, traumatized woman who immediately went to hospital and claimed she'd been violently assaulted and raped (by Conor) - and her state seemed to coorberate that - and the only physical evidence of any man having had sex with her belongs to 1 man - Conor McGregor. Who admits having sex with her... but 'it was consensual'... said, every rapist ever.
What on fkn Earth would be her motive for inventing the idea this happened. Where did the injuries come from. Rough sex? Oh and she just forgot she was on her period and had her tampon in? No woman forgets this. Any non rapist who's ever slept - or gone to (but then not forced himself, bc not a rapist like him) - with a woman who's on her period, no matter how fkn drunk - knows they are very self-conscious about this, there is no way she'd leave her tampon in... it was rammed up inside her... why? Well, if he did rape her as she said, he wouldn't have known she had this in - or, not cared - and this would have happened; that fits the evidence.
Or, what, did she forget bc she was just so turned on by this 5.4 manlet ginger woman assaulting dick face? Gimmie a break. She wanted to hang out with McGregor a celebrity and was doing coke n shit; no women find that man physically attractive, and he fkn forced himself on her when she rejected him - because he's got a massive fkn ego and can't handle rejection - especially after just having his life ruined by Khabib = it was right around that time, after that loss - SIMILAR to Mike Tyson's rape happening right after the Douglas loss. Not a coincidence. This is these pathetic






s' way of feeling powerful again.