Report: Conor McGregor Appeals Verdict in Civil Sexual Assault Case

You are wasting your time, that karen has cognitive issues and/or is too vested emotionally in this.

My main problem with the case (and i am merely saying that it s a weak case, not that conor is not guilty) is that it is established that she doesn‘t remember shit. It is established that she went back partying after the alleged rape. How can she then be sure that it was a rape? Can we rule out that they had rough sex and went back partying after? How does the tampon part rule out rough sex?
Dude, you are embarrassing yourself.

Look up the definition of the word consent. It's very important.

You should also ask yourself why you are so passionately defending a rapist.
 
It is though. Social media is full of evidence of it. But I won't bother with digressing too much into it though, because that's a whole 'nother subject and a can of worms.



So you have seen the evidence ? I thought it wasn't public, or else why would the judge bother with ordering Conor to destroy it?
It has been circulating, because McGregor and his fans have been sharing it, hence the court order. It's CCTV footage where the victim is acting strangely after the alleged assault.
Weren't many of her statements disproven(or at least strongly disputed) and also proven she lied to her BF via text and shit. It's more the gruesome nature of the injuries that was what really convinced the jury? Doesn't exactly sound like the entire story is that plausible.
It's a hell of a lot more plausible than McGregor's story.
So you have read the entire court case papers? <mma4>
I followed the case.
I'm doubtful that was in the papers though.
That's what happened.
When he was being interrogated he initially denied everything. When confronted with the DNA evidence and medical report he immediately lied and said his (retarded) friend had sex with her too. Cowardly behaviour.
If he has done it, karma will be paid eventually. I wouldn't get worked up about it.
We are witnessing karma, but it's slow. At least he has lost the respect of everyone but the absolute lowest scum.
 
It has been circulating, because McGregor and his fans have been sharing it, hence the court order. It's CCTV footage where the victim is acting strangely after the alleged assault.

Yeah, I think I have seen it. Wasn't sure if it was the evidence the judge wanted destroyed though.

It's a hell of a lot more plausible than McGregor's story.

Like I said, both don't come across as very truthfu from what I have gathered.

I followed the case.

Yes, I have too, but not super closely. But have you read the court case? Just trying to find out how familiar you are with the case. Just "following" something doesn't tell me that much.

That's what happened.

When he was being interrogated he initially denied everything. When confronted with the DNA evidence and medical report he immediately lied and said his (retarded) friend had sex with her too. Cowardly behaviour.

So where's the part about him paying his friend? What evidence is there that he paid him?


We are witnessing karma, but it's slow. At least he has lost the respect of everyone but the absolute lowest scum.

Indeed. We are always witnessing karma.
 
So where's the part about him paying his friend? What evidence is there that he paid him?
The guy is a long-time associate and on McGregor's payroll. Can I prove that? No, but he is.

McGregor is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Of course he paid his friend to lie. He also paid the other woman who was there. Obviously.

He also paid his legal fees, which is good, since McGregor is the one who got him involved when he claimed that James Lawrence had sex with the victim too.
Indeed. We are always witnessing karma.
Indeed.
 
The guy is a long-time associate and on McGregor's payroll. Can I prove that? No, but he is.

McGregor is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Of course he paid his friend to lie. He also paid the other woman who was there. Obviously.

I'm not questioning the plausibility of it. Just wanted to know if there was evidence of it, like I said, I doubt it's in the court case papers. The way you wrote it made it seem like it might have been in the case papers.

He also paid his legal fees, which is good, since McGregor is the one who got him involved when he claimed that James Lawrence had sex with the victim too.

Yeah, I know he did. Either way it's good he paid for his fees.


KermitBale.gif
 
I think being found guilty in civil court makes sense. Something terrible happened to this woman, and Conor admits having sex with her so he's the obvious culprit. He had the means and opportunity.

But we have to be honest, too. She was a complete danger slut that was being passed around by Conor and his mates. That isnt to say she deserved what happened, but if it came out tomorrow that Conor Mate #4 also banged her while she was drugged up, and he was the one that got violent with her, there'd be zero shock from me.

Like I said, Conor admits having sex with her her, so he's there and had the opportunity to do it. But im not gonna pretend for one second that this girls story doesn't have lots of holes in it, but the evidence does suggest that someone was violent with her, and Conor is the closest target. Given the evidence he makes the most sense, but its by no means some sort of slam dunk. Civil burden? Yeah, he meets that level. If it were a criminal trial? I'd vote not guilty, but I wouldn't feel good about it.

But the idea she's some 'pass around slut' is not proven in any way.

James, Conor's mate said he had sex with her...
Even though she says he didn't. And there's no evidence of his DNA on or anywhere near her.

More strangely,
James offered himself up - went to the police station to state this, and the police were confused by it.

This was after Conor's interview, whereby a cop apparently said... AFTER Conor was shown the bruises (aka undeniable evidence of his violent work), Conor was like 'she also had sex with James' or something. Or tried to implicate him...

I think it's quite obvious from this Conor is a fkn snake and just implicated him by threat/coercion and James went and put himself in the line of fire, on the proviso 'they both get off' by implying she was just sleeping around and 'it wasn't them', which is fkn ridiculous and how a 10 yr old thinks, but it's the best Conor thought of.

ONLY Conor's DNA was found in and on her.

If James had sex with her... where tf is his DNA.

You have a bruised & battered, traumatized woman who immediately went to hospital and claimed she'd been violently assaulted and raped (by Conor) - and her state seemed to coorberate that - and the only physical evidence of any man having had sex with her belongs to 1 man - Conor McGregor. Who admits having sex with her... but 'it was consensual'... said, every rapist ever.

What on fkn Earth would be her motive for inventing the idea this happened. Where did the injuries come from. Rough sex? Oh and she just forgot she was on her period and had her tampon in? No woman forgets this. Any non rapist who's ever slept - or gone to (but then not forced himself, bc not a rapist like him) - with a woman who's on her period, no matter how fkn drunk - knows they are very self-conscious about this, there is no way she'd leave her tampon in... it was rammed up inside her... why? Well, if he did rape her as she said, he wouldn't have known she had this in - or, not cared - and this would have happened; that fits the evidence.

Or, what, did she forget bc she was just so turned on by this 5.4 manlet ginger woman assaulting dick face? Gimmie a break. She wanted to hang out with McGregor a celebrity and was doing coke n shit; no women find that man physically attractive, and he fkn forced himself on her when she rejected him - because he's got a massive fkn ego and can't handle rejection - especially after just having his life ruined by Khabib = it was right around that time, after that loss - SIMILAR to Mike Tyson's rape happening right after the Douglas loss. Not a coincidence. This is these pathetic :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:s' way of feeling powerful again.
 
But the idea she's some 'pass around slut' is not proven in any way.

James, Conor's mate said he had sex with her...
Even though she says he didn't. And there's no evidence of his DNA on or anywhere near her.

More strangely,
James offered himself up - went to the police station to state this, and the police were confused by it.

This was after Conor's interview, whereby a cop apparently said... AFTER Conor was shown the bruises (aka undeniable evidence of his violent work), Conor was like 'she also had sex with James' or something. Or tried to implicate him...

I think it's quite obvious from this Conor is a fkn snake and just implicated him by threat/coercion and James went and put himself in the line of fire, on the proviso 'they both get off' by implying she was just sleeping around and 'it wasn't them', which is fkn ridiculous and how a 10 yr old thinks, but it's the best Conor thought of.

ONLY Conor's DNA was found in and on her.

If James had sex with her... where tf is his DNA.

You have a bruised & battered, traumatized woman who immediately went to hospital and claimed she'd been violently assaulted and raped (by Conor) - and her state seemed to coorberate that - and the only physical evidence of any man having had sex with her belongs to 1 man - Conor McGregor. Who admits having sex with her... but 'it was consensual'... said, every rapist ever.
Technically Conor being a rapist isnt proven either. Theres evidence that can lead you to that conclusion.

Let's just be real here. Her own story is that she wound up in the bedroom multiple times and "didnt know how she got there". Once her own story is full of gaps and holes from drug use, she cant conclusively say something didnt happen. If Anybody wore a condom, theyre less likely to leave DNA traces.

I'm just being real. It's quite possible Conor raped her and at the very least he's a scumbag. However, lets be real with this woman too. She was a drugged up slut. Even if she only had sex with Conor, she was still a danger-slut. This makes no difference as to whether somebody raped her or not and it makes no legal difference to anything. But lets not pretend things arent the way they are. Literally every single person involved with this story is a degenerate human being. That includes the victim. It happens sometimes. George Floyd was also a scumbag doing scumbag behavior, but it doesnt make Derek Chauvin less guilty.
 
Worked well for Kobe. People hardly ever consider him a rapist


Because he wasn't. That case against him was dog shit, and should never have been taken to trial. It literally fell apart the week of the trial when the prosecution's star forensic witness told them that he'd be testifying in Kobe's favor, and then accuser refuse to testify.

The accuser was so full of shit but she had to write an apology letter to the lead detective for telling so many lies.
 
Because he wasn't. That case against him was dog shit, and should never have been taken to trial. It literally fell apart the week of the trial when the prosecution's star forensic witness told them that he'd be testifying in Kobe's favor, and then accuser refuse to testify.

The accuser was so full of shit but she had to write an apology letter to the lead detective for telling so many lies.
Lol you made my point. Throw a enough money at the situation and stfu and you get to fool the public
 
Back
Top