Discussion in 'The War Room' started by thefirstemporer, Feb 10, 2019.
But but but but NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT...NO ONE...
Extrapolated based on the ongoing issues with the amount we have now and in the past. Now I am counting the ones that come and overstay, and not just the ones that cross undetected. There is great enough number for MSM to be reporting on this ongoing phenomenon for many, many years now.
Not even that but the conclusion is written in a way to inspire fear in a certain % of the population.
Your answer to this question is whether you view "people" as something of value or not.
While you wouldn't want to let 42 million in right away, due to the logistics of that many coming all at once, I have no problem letting 42 million in over the course of 5-10 years.
if you had a ventriloquist dummy you could set yourself and knock it down all by yourself.
Then why wasn't your response related to that, at all? You just posited that the idea of 42 million immigrants was lunacy and complained about that. It's hypothetical; the internal logic of "how many there are" is irrelevant to "how many are you willing to take?"
Again, your first post was missing the point of the thread.
Europeans came over, so I don't care who else does too. Keep it fair for everyone.
That only works on genuine Christians.
Your side has taught me a lot about conspiracy theories
So you wouldn’t mind the United States becoming just another Latin American country?
Like Trump paying caravans to invade the border
I already asked him. He turned the other direction.
Nope. Humans should all interact with others regardless of race , culture ,religion, and gender.
What if those cultures/religions disagree with each other? Humans are tribalistic and this can be seen at even the smallest levels.
It's hilarious how you guys have to keep dolling up your white anxiety fantasies in ever more garish dresses. This one's just fabulous.
Says the white guilt cuck. This is coming from an unbiased source but even you’re too partisan to see that. Pathetic.
There's no way you're dumb enough to think that my laughing at your interpretation of the data means that I'm criticizing the data.
Separate names with a comma.