It's not a cute little argument to point out that Jon would've fought 2x since Tom's last fight if he fights this summer and Tom meanwhile hasn't fought since last summer. Tom would be the one not willing to defend his spot supposedly at the top while Jon is. Why would we strip the active champ for the inactive one?Its a cute little argument you're trying there, but it doesn't work like that. Tom at the moment doesn't have the obligation to fight anyone else. Tom already did that by fighting Blaydes. An interim title is only meant to be defended while the actual champion is out. Jon Jones got hurt and Tom won the interim belt and then defended it because Jon Jones was out and then took on a different opponent for a legacy fight.
Tom defended while Jon was recovering and fighting his legacy fight, then Jon fought his legacy fight. All that is done, both guys fought once and now it's time for the two guys to fight and unify. It's not everyone gets a turn and it keeps going.
Plain and simple now, Jon doesnt fight Tom it's a very clear duck. He can chase Perreira all he wants, bottom line it's a duck of the fight that needs to happen.
That probably sounded better in your head. Id expect UFC would announce Tom’s next fight as soon as they announce Jones’ non-Aspinall opponent. Probably on the same day.What does that say about Tom then who's meanwhile fighting nobody
What does that make Tom's "reign" for being even longer without fightingThe dude fought like 5 months ago. We need to wait another 5-6 months?
His heavyweight "reign" sucks.
The card should be at the end of June so about 3 1/2 months. Expect the fight to get announced in a month or so.The dude fought like 5 months ago. We need to wait another 5-6 months?
His heavyweight "reign" sucks.
Maybe after Chris Camozzi settles his beef with Jacare.I was hoping for Jon Jones vs Chris Camozzi
Your guys confusion by contrast seems to be giving the title challengers more privilege than the actual champions. If there's no privileges at the top then do away with belts period.You're really confusing interim title with a champion given privilege to just cherry pick who they want to fight. No different than Bisping blatantly ignoring Romero and Whittaker back whenever when they gave him 50 year old Hendo and GSP.
Tom by contrast though totally didn't cherrypick 1 fight win streak Blaydes for truck loads of money in his home town to avenge a loss ehJones was allowed to cherry pick whomever he wanted regardless if any interim belt was present or not. Any non idiot can see 43 year old Stipe is easily the least risk for the most reward which is right up Jones' alley at this point of his career.
Jon can defend his belt but Tom can't?That probably sounded better in your head. Id expect UFC would announce Tom’s next fight as soon as they announce Jones’ non-Aspinall opponent. Probably on the same day.
The only thing Tom has waited for since defending his belt is Jones. If Jones doesn’t want to fight him, I’m not sure how that’s Tom’s Fault..
… Yes they both can. Against each other.Jon can defend his belt but Tom can't?
Interesting.
Is Jon really waiting for the result of ank vs pereira to decide whether he wants alex or tom
![]()
It's not a cute little argument to point out that Jon would've fought 2x since Tom's last fight if he fights this summer and Tom meanwhile hasn't fought since last summer. Tom would be the one not willing to defend his spot supposedly at the top while Jon is. Why would we strip the active champ for the inactive one?
As to the Pereira situation, I mean there's a pretty clear solution there if Jon really wants to fight him instead of Tom: Tom takes out Pereira himself and forces the issue so that Jon can't even entertain it anymore.
In an ideal world of course Tom should simply be next, and should've simply been next before Stipe. Interim's are supposed to be more active than regular belts: they're there in the interim of the regular belt being active. It's bizzaro world logic to say we must strip the active real champion for the inactive fake interim champion. That's rewarding bad behaviour (Tom's inactivity) and punishing good behaviour (Jon's activity).
I agree try to make them unify but if they really can't while Jon's offering multiple options and Tom's refusing anything but an undisputed fight then strip Tom. He can be #1 contender without his useless belt.