- Joined
- Dec 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,384
- Reaction score
- 7
Jones in your name and AV so I know I'm wasting time, but let me help others with this.
*Jones' 0.35 is better but the 0.19 and the flux is part of the concern.
*Cormier's 0.4 is more than double Jone's low test and did not flux as intensely.
*Cormier is older, and after 30 T-levels drop significantly.
*SHouldn't you be concerned your 27-year-old fighter has HALF the T/E ratio of a guy nearly a decade older?
But let me be clear. Jones isn't really the issue at this point. THe problem is that the NSAC seems fine with covering their own ass and not on finding out why a 27-year-old epic stud athlete had a "watery sample" and was 0.29, 0.35, 0.19 on his T/E wherein the epi-testosterone was incredibly high.
I know I'm wasting my time but you clearly don't understand the difference between T/E ratio and total T.