Cormier had low T/E ratio's

Jones in your name and AV so I know I'm wasting time, but let me help others with this.

*Jones' 0.35 is better but the 0.19 and the flux is part of the concern.
*Cormier's 0.4 is more than double Jone's low test and did not flux as intensely.
*Cormier is older, and after 30 T-levels drop significantly.
*SHouldn't you be concerned your 27-year-old fighter has HALF the T/E ratio of a guy nearly a decade older?


But let me be clear. Jones isn't really the issue at this point. THe problem is that the NSAC seems fine with covering their own ass and not on finding out why a 27-year-old epic stud athlete had a "watery sample" and was 0.29, 0.35, 0.19 on his T/E wherein the epi-testosterone was incredibly high.

I know I'm wasting my time but you clearly don't understand the difference between T/E ratio and total T.
 
Getting humbled in this thread.

My humbling has yet to come.

Being right all the time is hard to maintain, admittedly.

I assume this is why I am your #2 top poster :wink:

humble.gif
 
The commission and the ufc are way too close in this situation.

Its fishy as hell
 
The commission and the ufc are way too close in this situation.

Its fishy as hell

There is a reason they didn't wanna back gsp up on vada. Nsac and Casino owners have a relationship that vada can't provide.
 
Wow I didn't realize fighters had such low T/E ratios. Seems unlikely when the avarage for a black male is around 1.3 and higher than that for athletes. It's amazing how well they perform in the cage despite their obvious genetic shortcomings.
 
Both guys might be on PED maskers. Damn.

They test for those. They also test for synthetic testosterone. If they were on anything, it wasn't on the banned list and it is undetectable.
 
Cormiers levels are questionable, but Jones are very, very questionable. A 27 year old athlete in great physical shape, who has access to all the best nutrition and supplements shouldn't be at those levels naturally.
 
Last edited:
I think Cormier's levels are questionable. I hope Jones fans do to. A 0.4 is definitely something to ask questions about, despite his age and the grind of training.

So let's ask questions about all these numbers, and let's hear some answers.
 
Jones in your name and AV so I know I'm wasting time, but let me help others with this.

*Jones' 0.35 is better but the 0.19 and the flux is part of the concern.
*Cormier's 0.4 is more than double Jone's low test and did not flux as intensely.
*Cormier is older, and after 30 T-levels drop significantly.
*SHouldn't you be concerned your 27-year-old fighter has HALF the T/E ratio of a guy nearly a decade older?


But let me be clear. Jones isn't really the issue at this point. THe problem is that the NSAC seems fine with covering their own ass and not on finding out why a 27-year-old epic stud athlete had a "watery sample" and was 0.29, 0.35, 0.19 on his T/E wherein the epi-testosterone was incredibly high.

You are indeed wasting your time, thanks for at least attempting reason though.
 
Since you guys all love to talk about Jones' test score, here are Daniels per a report.

"By contrast, Daniel Cormier, Jones' opponent at UFC 182, had a T/E ratio of .4 on Dec. 2 and .48 on Dec. 17. Cormier passed both those tests."

This is well below the 1:1 that everyone is claiming to be normal. I guess DC may be trying to cheat too.

http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/1/8...on-head-jon-jones-testosterone-clean-prior-to

Ratios, not ratio's. Apostrophes do not indicate plural, but possession and contraction.
 
The new strategy of Jones fans..... every 5-year-olds strategy. "But...... but he did it too."

Test Cormier equally to Jones. I want blood, all the urine samples. I want a full comprehensive testing done on both. My interest is in knowing why Epi-T was so high in Jones. If Cormier is caught in the crossfire, good, because cheaters are obnoxious.

No no no... that isn't how we do this. You're either a Jones fan or a Jones hater. You cannot simply dislike both people. This shall not pass!
 
I don't get the attitude of the TS. If early conclusions on Jones T:E ratio turned out to be wrong, why should people repeat the mistake in a less dramatic instance?

The whole thing makes me have a headache, tbh. I hope we get more information soon, better expert statements soon, that none of them are juicing, and if they are, that they get caught and punished.
 
Back
Top