Anyone who voices skepticism about the conviction and ruling should ask themselves a few questions.
- If Nikita Hand is lying, where did she get her severe injuries from, and the incrusted tampon that had to be surgically removed by a forcep?
She sent pictures of her injuries to a friend after the incident before returning home. The friend testified, and there are records of the message exchange.
- Had she been attacked by her boyfriend upon return, did he beat her up, and then rape her while using a condom? And then she decided it would be a good spin to blame Conor? That is not plausible either, because she sent messages distressed to her friend before returning home. The hours were exposed and verified.
They only found Conor's DNA in her. She was in her period. Not Lawrence, not anyone else's.
- So, the hypothesis that it was the boyfriend is ruled out.
-The injuries were severe that the doctors and those who saw them in court testified that they had not seen the likes of those.
- So, the hypothesis of "consensual but rough sex" is ridiculous. The woman was battered, in pain, and injured.
Yes, she was in CCTV shown interacting affectionately with Conor and Lawrence after having intercourse with Conor.
She went back and forth into the hotel. She has memory blanks. We know she was extremely drunk and had been taking tons of alcohol and drugs.
- If this was a money grab, why did she go to criminal court, and only decided to pursue civil reparations when that fell apart, while also refusing settlement, despite the enormous liability this would cause her and the massive interest in Conor's behalf to do so and avoid a public derail and exposition like this?
There are ample reports of this, but this should suffice:
Was she cunningly expecting that the criminal case would be turned down, despite time and financial resources, so as to increase her bluff?
This is preposterous, and anyone who claims that is disqualified from being taken seriously.
- We also know she was traumatized for years, impaired in several ways. Doctors, and specialists testified to this in court.
- We also know, from every study, that in fact the percentage of false accusations of sexual assault are extremely small.
- We also know that Conor is not only rich, but has deep connections with the Irish mafia and that he is a celebrity. Anyone who claims there is a possibility she is lying, ought to likewise admit that there is a possibility there was corruption, and this is why the criminal case was not opened. Many are of this opinion.
- We know Conor has a history of accusations of sexual assault and violent physical harm. We know he has injured civilians. We know he has issues with substance abuse, violent behavior, lack of self control. He injured a bunch of people in the dolly incident, jumped on a ref, an Italian DJ, assaulted an older man at a bar, smashed a fan's phone into the ground outside a club. A woman jumped from a yacht and was rescued by the Red Cross patrol with abdominal injuries saying she was kicked by Conor. Her car was set on fire. Nikita Hand's house was broken into and his BF stabbed.
- So, what are we to believe? That Nikita Hand self-inflicted her injuries after leaving the party, shoving a tampon up her vagina to the point of injury, battering her entire body, while she suddenly started her period. Faked her trauma story when messaging her friend to dupe her. Then duped the doctors, boyfriend, and trauma specialists, and finally the jury.
Or, that Nikita Hand was actually raped, she was intoxicated, traumatized, and didn't know how to process or react for things for hours, as is also not uncommon with victims of assault.
Seriously, to give Conor McGregor "the benefit of doubt" here takes a lot of malice, stupidity, and blindness.
lodged in back of his skull 
and his wife says it was just an accident and is miraculously acquitted of murder; does that mean God doesn't know the truth??
