Yep and he didn't have sex with Nikita. It's not possible for his DNA to not be there.
Wouldnt wearing a condom make DNA less likely to be present?
Im kinda late to the party and only recently checked out the details. Im almost certain the most informative vids were from
@Hellowhosthat, but maybe it was someone else. But anyway, whoever posted them, thanks.
Ultimately, any rape charge is incredibly difficult to deal with from a legal perspective. But this is not a good look for Conor and his cronies at all. In a weird way, I think civil liability is sort of the more practical outcome given the circumstances, just purely from the perspective of the evidence and what it means. There's some he said/she said, and one of the biggest problems in these cases is once once you have a plaintiff has any sort of memories issues, especially for reasons that include drugs and alcohol, everything just becomes clear as mud. But given the extent of the apparent injuries it would seem very obvious that something happened, and Conor would be the most likely culprit.
Weirdly, I think theres just barely enough here for reasonable doubt in a criminal trial, but enough to meet the criteria for civil liability. So, just from a perspective of the evidence and what it means, this is the "just" outcome. But if he did do it then obviously this is nowhere near justice, but we have to go with what we have.