I like Jordan Peterson's take on this.
We don't belong to just one group, we belong to many. And race/sex/ethnicity are not the only axis along which we may assess privilege. Intelligence and attractiveness are obvious examples. So Obama, for instance, doesn't have white privilege, but he's brilliant, charismatic, a great speaker, rich, and let's not forget, the former leader of the free world. If that's not privilege, I don't know what is.
So what's the best way to take all of your individual privileges into account? Stop analyzing privilege at a collectivist level and just take each person as an individual.
Each person deserves to be treated as an individual, not as a member of a group. Not exactly a novel concept, but one that invalidates the idea of "white privilege".
That's great if we can collectively do that. But we can't. That's kind of the point.

