• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

White privilege diminishes our humanity: 10 Commitments for meaningful change

What other historical relevance is needed outside of the scientific / industrial revolutions? Humanity is six million (not thousand, TCK) years in the making, 200,000 since evolving into modern anatomical form and 50,000 out from the of behavioral modernity. What's taken place over the last 330+ comfortably eclipses every advancement that came before it combined. The publishing of Naturalis Principia Mathematica may well be the most significant 'event' in the history of the species.

And these are actually things the British Isles and Anglo/English can lay 'claim' to in particular - the only real white people. I'm genetically Nordic and we've never really done shit aside from create cool mythology, build dope viking ships, rape and pillage as warlords for 270 or so years before getting put in our place and knocked back up north when King Harald III was killed in battle. Was he swarthy and packing a big, black donger though? I seriously doubt it

That's all bullshit tho. You can't date things that far back. And even if you could the idea that you could accurately map out 6 million years of human history is just not a credible notion. I think one has to really be fooling themselves to accept these kind of timelines as accurate. It's all based on pretense man.
 
But all I'm doing is presenting you with information and you don't even look at it. Which is fine but then why be baffled when you know you ignoring things?

For instance, if I tell you that Henry the 3rd of the Holy Roman Empire was also known as Enrique el Negro, Henry the Black, and Den Svarte(svarte as in 'swarthy') you wouldn't bat an eye. But for me I would be forced to ask myself..."why is the german king being called a negro by his contemporaries when he is supposed to be white?" Theres only one answer to that question man lol. I'm baffled that you can so easily dismiss these things.
Don't feel bad I also dismiss the Nordic Egyptian theory as well.
 
Did you ignore a bunch of information when doing so also?
Yes. I also ignore "information" from the bible, the Qur'an, phrenology pamphlets, KKK documents, the Black Hebrew Israelite website, Disney movies and leech doctors. They all have something relevant to add to their respective coonvos, too bad it's usually wrapped in hokum, misinformation or agenda driven sleight of hand.
 
Yes. I also ignore "information" from the bible, the Qur'an, phrenology pamphlets, KKK documents, the Black Hebrew Israelite website, Disney movies and leech doctors. They all have something relevant to add to their respective coonvos, too bad it's usually wrapped in hokum, misinformation or agenda driven sleight of hand.

Well, then I understand why you are baffled if you literally ignore information lol.
 
Well, then I understand why you are baffled if you literally ignore information lol.
You're a creationist, correct? Or, perhaps more accurately an intelligent design type of guy? Macro vs micro evolutionary?

I mean, just how exactly did we evolve from lower lifeforms? Now where, o, where could someone find such info?
 
That's all bullshit tho. You can't date things that far back. And even if you could the idea that you could accurately map out 6 million years of human history is just not a credible notion. I think one has to really be fooling themselves to accept these kind of timelines as accurate. It's all based on pretense man.

There's a strong basis for it from a convergence of numerous fields of study although certainly quite a few gaps remain in evolutionary history. You don't "believe" any of it, that's whatever, not much point in a discussion and it's beside the point about the scientific / industrial revolutions which nearly downgrade the rest of history to mere trivia in their wake.

... As well as the apparent black Nordic people I'm a recent descendant of. I'm buying 'brown skinned' as that is what the genetic evidence actually suggests - but from over 8,000+ years ago at minimum, not the 1750s. White people are babies on the global population block, but we're not that young.
 
The most searched term on pornhub? BSwarthyC. It is known.

New York Times: On America's Deep Fear Of The Black Penis

One night, when I was 24 and living in San Francisco, I met a handsome white guy visiting from Germany. We stood near a window in a crowded bar and talked about an art show he’d just seen. Eventually I brought him to my apartment, where, after removing some of his clothes, he eagerly started to undo my pants. But then he stood there for a moment and gave my crotch a long, perplexed look, like Geraldo Rivera did when, after months of buildup, he opened what turned out to be Al Capone’s empty vault. He replaced his clothes and, before exiting, explained himself: “That’s not what I expected.”

I knew what he meant. He was expecting a “Guinness Book of World Records” penis. He wasn’t the only one — just the last to do it with such efficiently rendered disappointment. That hurt, but I remember being amused that, for him, all our attraction came down to was what someone had told him my dick should look like. I remember standing there, half-dressed in my living room, and actually saying out loud, “Why does he know that?”

But everybody knows. Anytime a pair of pants is prematurely rezipped or the line goes dead in a sex app’s chat window, I always know: He was expecting a banana, a cucumber, an eggplant, something that belongs to either a farm animal or NASA. He was expecting the mythical Big Black Dick (which, online, people just call “B.B.D.”). That presumption is something you tend to prepare for with interracial sex — that your dick could either render the rest of you disposable or put your humanity on a pedestal, out of reach. That it could make you a Mapplethorpe.

@bad seed @ShinkanPo

I really gotta stay out of this thread.

Yea, you may want to stay the FUCK out of it. <Lmaoo>
 
There's a strong basis for it from a convergence of numerous fields of study although certainly quite a few gaps remain in evolutionary history. You don't "believe" any of it, that's whatever, not much point in a discussion and it's beside the point about the scientific / industrial revolutions which nearly downgrade the rest of history to mere trivia in their wake.

In my humble opinion once you begin to go through each one of those fields, the claims, the studies, the methodologies, the logic, the people, the money...you find out it's all based on pretense with a bunch of holes everywhere. But that's just my opinion.

I don't think one can argue that the industrial revolution has erased the impact and importance of say the Roman Empire. And the mere knowledge and understanding of the history of the world prior to those revolutions is every bit as important and consequential as they have always been. I don't understand how history has become downgraded.

... As well as the apparent black Nordic people I'm a recent descendant of. I'm buying 'brown skinned' as that is what the genetic evidence actually suggests - but from over 8,000+ years ago at minimum, not the 1750s. White people are babies on the global population block, but we're not that young.

Meanwhile I'm looking at paintings, statues, and descriptions of black and brown people all over medieval Europe and the Americas. I think we've been trained as a society to ignore things right in front of our faces in favor of theories and abstract ideas that we can't actually prove.

For instance Henry the 3rd is literally nicknamed "Negro". Ben Franklin literally says that Europe is black. Early American explorers describe the indians as black like Ethiopians. German family crests have black faces on them. The Inca's Kings list from the 1500s is full of so called black people. And on and on. But we should ignore that in favor of theories and ideas concerning "genetic evidence"?
 
Fuck me man, everything is backwards lol. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!

which-are-you-american-n-an-aboriginal-or-one-of-12346301.png
 
In my humble opinion once you begin to go through each one of those fields, the claims, the studies, the methodologies, the logic, the people, the money...you find out it's all based on pretense with a bunch of holes everywhere. But that's just my opinion.

I don't think one can argue that the industrial revolution has erased the impact and importance of say the Roman Empire. And the mere knowledge and understanding of the history of the world prior to those revolutions is every bit as important and consequential as they have always been. I don't understand how history has become downgraded.

Erase? Fuck no, but I do find it frivolous to look at world history without a noted separation of pre/post scientific and industrial revolution - especially in relation to the global economy or nation state power structure - just based on the fact that prior to them, economic progress was almost entirely linear and directly proportional to population size and growth.

In ancient times up through to the middle ages, you had the likes of mathematics, astronomy and engineering but the fields of physics, chemistry, biology as we recognize them today, as well as their practical applications for technological innovation were largely nonexistent. It's all happened within roughly the last 330+ years. There's not much in the form of recognizable science prior to the Newtonian Synthesis.

Why would white people need to steal anyone else's history in light of that?

global-gdp-since-steam-engine.png


Meanwhile I'm looking at paintings, statues, and descriptions of black and brown people all over medieval Europe and the Americas. I think we've been trained as a society to ignore things right in front of our faces in favor of theories and abstract ideas that we can't actually prove.

For instance Henry the 3rd is literally nicknamed "Negro". Ben Franklin literally says that Europe is black. Early American explorers describe the indians as black like Ethiopians. German family crests have black faces on them. The Inca's Kings list from the 1500s is full of so called black people. And on and on. But we should ignore that in favor of theories and ideas concerning "genetic evidence"?

They aren't theories and ideas, it's the literal genomic sequencing of adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine, the nitrogenous bases which constitute the building blocks of deoxyribonucleic acid.
 
By being arrogant enough to claim that you're privileged... Implies that you are better than other people. Which is why minorities don't even use the term.

Only white losers who were told to feel bad and guilty about something they have no control over use the term privileged. Could you stick your fucking nose in the air any higher?
reverse psychology
 
Erase? Fuck no, but I do find it frivolous to look at world history without a noted separation of pre/post scientific and industrial revolution - especially in relation to the global economy or nation state power structure - just based on the fact that prior to them, economic progress was almost entirely linear and directly proportional to population size and growth.

In ancient times up through to the middle ages, you had the likes of mathematics, astronomy and engineering but the fields of physics, chemistry, biology as we recognize them today, as well as their practical applications for technological innovation were largely nonexistent. It's all happened within roughly the last 330+ years. There's not much in the form of recognizable science prior to the Newtonian Synthesis.

Why would white people need to steal anyone else's history in light of that?

global-gdp-since-steam-engine.png

It isn't simply about achieving historical relevancy or glory it's also about power and control. If you can convince the descendants of a conquered and enslaved people that they are really from somewhere else that solves a lot of problems for you. It allows you to claim legal ownership of lands and resources. It allows you to be united and keep everyone else divided.

If your goal is to increase the numbers of your race(aka nation, aka family), and dominate the world, as Ben Franklin suggested, then colonizing everything and remaking history is the way to do it. Creating a theory that puts colored people right above monkey-man and the white man right above him seems natural. Using typification artists to rework old paintings to appear lighter would be a good idea. Museums would probably stash 90% of the artifacts they find in the basement and only display reworked replicas. Making Jesus a white man would be essential.

They aren't theories and ideas, it's the literal genomic sequencing of adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine, the nitrogenous bases which constitute the building blocks of deoxyribonucleic acid.

The philosophy and methodologies behind studying and interpreting these elements and sequences is where the theory and idea comes in.

But let me ask you a hypothetical. If you did a dna test on someone and determined they were supposed to be white but then someone shows you a picture of them being black would dismiss the dna test or the picture?
 
It isn't simply about achieving historical relevancy or glory it's also about power and control. If you can convince the descendants of a conquered and enslaved people that they are really from somewhere else that solves a lot of problems for you. It allows you to claim legal ownership of lands and resources. It allows you to be united and keep everyone else divided.

If your goal is to increase the numbers of your race(aka nation, aka family), and dominate the world, as Ben Franklin suggested, then colonizing everything and remaking history is the way to do it. Creating a theory that puts colored people right above monkey-man and the white man right above him seems natural. Using typification artists to rework old paintings to appear lighter would be a good idea. Museums would probably stash 90% of the artifacts they find in the basement and only display reworked replicas. Making Jesus a white man would be essential.

You mean like with the 'American' example you keep drawing? Nobody with a brain considers us to be the original people of this land and the obnoxious "real" American rhetoric propagated by white nationalists is actually in reference to the sovereign country that was established as the United States. I don't consider myself an American beyond citizenship, I'm a European. Lo and Behold, my genome also clusters precisely with the contemporary populations of Northern Europe.

The philosophy and methodologies behind studying and interpreting these elements and sequences is where the theory and idea comes in.

But let me ask you a hypothetical. If you did a dna test on someone and determined they were supposed to be white but then someone shows you a picture of them being black would dismiss the dna test or the picture?

Except for the 99% chance that wouldn't happen? Skin color is a polygenic trait with many genetic loci involved in its expression but we more or less have down the primary genes and their respective variations that account for it.

You want some "theory" history, bruv? The black men from Deutschland may enjoy this @snakedafunky, @JDragon, @Factory.

So like, quantum mechanics is arguably the most radical ever put forth and along with General Relativity constitutes one of the two pillars that modern (i.e. present day) physics is built off. It's estimated that up to 25% of the GDP of first world countries is based on the technological applications born out of it: everything from semiconductors, modern computers, smart phones to lasers, magnetic resonance imaging, atomic clocks and GPS.

Quantum theory origin begins with Max Planck (1858-1947), who was the de facto curator of scientific research in Germany throughout the first half of the 20th century during a time in which it unequivocally led the world on the cutting edge. His life and philosophy outside of his scientific work is of great interest on its own, particularly because of the personal tragedy it was marked by and numerous historical intersections: from direct confrontations with Adolf Hitler and secretly keeping Jewish scientists employed at the Kaiser Wilhelm Society (later renamed Max Planck Society in 1948), to losing one son during the battle of Verdun in World War I and losing another for his involvement in the 1944 Assassination plot on Hitler during World War II.

Circling back to 1900: While working on a solution for discrepancies with black body radiation that physics of the time couldn't account for Planck found that to match experimental data, the energy of a vibrating molecule could only take on certain values and that it would have to be proportional to the frequency of vibration, which led him to postulate that light energy could only be emitted and absorbed in discrete packets he dubbed "quanta". He was later the lone recepient awarded the 1918 Nobel Prize in physics as the founder of quantum theory.

He conceived of a fundamental physical constant of proportionality - known as Planck's constant denoted h - as the 'quantum of action' with a value of 6.626 x 10^-34 J-s (Joules/second) and developed the equation E = hf (also written E = hv) to measure the energy output of this discrete quanta which in a stroke of effortless genius five years later Albert Einstein identified as photons, literal particles of light - an absolutely preposterous idea at the time - and the force carrier of electromagnetism, one of the four fundamental interactions of nature alongside gravity, strong nuclear and weak nuclear in using it to explain the photoelectric effect. So thus given the frequency, Planck allowed us to measure the energy (in joules) of single photons across the entire electromagnetic spectrum. That's a start, this post is long.

It was in 1905 that Einstein would also formulate and introduce special relativity, mass-energy equivalence (E=mc2) and proved beyond doubt the existence of atoms via Brownian Motion, the latter of which was a notion on the nature of matter that had been hypothesized since the time of Leucippus and Democritus in Ancient Greece circa fifth century BC.

Any single one of the aforementioned achievements would've made him an ATG, none of them are even regarded as his greatest work. That would be General Relativity 10 years later, completely flipping human understanding of space and time on its head - a malleable four-dimensional continuum warped in the presence of mass/energy - and in the process opening the doors to modern astrophysics and cosmology.
 
I looked for the thread without luck. It was something like 12 suggestions for white folk to make up for their privilege. The only reason I remember it because I made one of my dismissive, asshat comments that got 50 likes from both sides of the isle. You know an idea is utter shite when everyone dismisses it regardless of political leanings.

You can readily find stuff like that everywhere. Check out reparations.me.

Here is one example listed:

POC 4: I'm too upset to make dinner. I live in Seattle.
White Person 4: "Come over to my house for dinner, bring a friend if you like. PM me and I'll send you the address, or can I order delivery to you? What kind of food do you like?"
 
You can readily find stuff like that everywhere. Check out reparations.me.

Here is one example listed:

POC 4: I'm too upset to make dinner. I live in Seattle.
White Person 4: "Come over to my house for dinner, bring a friend if you like. PM me and I'll send you the address, or can I order delivery to you? What kind of food do you like?"
<36>
 
Back
Top