- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Messages
- 19,918
- Reaction score
- 18,534
Why wouldn’t that add up? Are you some sort of crime scene analyst? Nearly every witness in that case who was on Brown’s side ended up recanting their statement.
Doesn't require a crime scene analyst background to know the difference between what is right and wrong. Verbal communication and verbal judo is one of the most important tools in law enforcement, the officer Wilson escalated the situation on his own from the start verbally shouting at Michael Brown and his friend for simply crossing a public street. From what happened there the accounts vary but only a fool would agree it's acceptable for a uniformed officer to attempt 12 shots on an unarmed person. He shot Michael Brown 6 times and killed an unarmed man that night just for he and his buddy crossing the roadway. The officer is no longer working in the profession, which is for the best since he fired 12 shots at an unarmed person.
People recant on incidents all the time and this includes officers in that pool. Rumor and innuendo spelled out the Ferguson PD had a distrust and terrible relationship with the general public years before the Michael Brown shooting, the shooting which led to the state police occupying the geographical area when the protests and riots grew. No crime scene analyst background or experience is necessary to reach the conclusion the officer was in the wrong. The uniformed officer violated the use of force policy and used excessive force
Last edited: