International Tucker Carlson in Russia to interview Vladimir Putin UPDATE - Also Dugin

I think YOU should put two and two together and realize that we have our own untrustworthy propaganda machine that cannot be trusted to air interviews they don't heavily edit, and our own president doesn't even do interviews with our own media if they don't have the questions in advance and full editorial control, so why the hell would that not apply to foreign media?

Do yiu think requesting that an interview be aired unedited is unreasonable? Tucker has requested interviews with Zelensky, but Zelensky "handpicks" who he interviews with.

I am glad you realize that it is happening, and that Tucker's interview is going to be untrustworthy propaganda. Thank you for admitting that.
 
yes....I said I would like to see some proof from the media outlets who are claiming to have requested interviews and were denied.

you responded with a press release from the kremlin as "proof", and you are actively arguing that the Kremlin statement is the gospel truth.

save your shit tier insults for reddit.

Are you retarded?
Serious question. It would explain a lot.

The proof is that FUCKING KREMLIN confirms what the media outlets claims.
You cant get better proof than that.

Why would Kremlin help out western medias? You really think Kremlin would lie to back up the medias claims?

Or you want the media outlets to post screen shots of their emails to the Kremlin?

Yes Kremlin and the western media is in cahoots here.

Derp derp derp derp.
 
Boo hoo the media cant control the interview so theyre having a meltdown. Of course he should be able to interview Putin what kind of question is this
 
Eh it's all irrelevant anyhow. 0 opinions will change and people will just go further into the viewpoint they already hold
 
The proof is that FUCKING KREMLIN
You cant get better proof than that.

The Kremlin "confirming" what the western media says isn't "helping out western media". If they are lying, it would be to save face for themselves, not be in "cahoots" with western media.

yes, screen shots of the supposed "multiple serious attempts" to interview Putin would be sufficient proof for their claims.
 
So unedited interviews are "propaganda", and heavily edited ones to push a narrative are "real journalism"? Got it.

Is it so hard for you to fathom that an unedited interview can still be propaganda? LOL - why is that hard for you?
 
Is it so hard for you to fathom that an unedited interview can still be propaganda? LOL - why is that hard for you?
Dunno, it's hard for you to fathom that heavily edited ones are, so it's pretty clear propaganda is what you're rooting for.

You don't have any problem with "propaganda", you only seem to care when it doesn't affirm your beliefs.
 
Dunno, it's hard for you to fathom that heavily edited ones are, so it's pretty clear propaganda is what you're rooting for.

I never said that it was hard to fathom. You are making things up for some odd reason.

And yes, I know that you "Dunno" - that much is obvious. <45>
 
The Kremlin "confirming" what the western media says isn't "helping out western media". If they are lying, it would be to save face for themselves, not be in "cahoots" with western media.

yes, screen shots of the supposed "multiple serious attempts" to interview Putin would be sufficient proof for their claims.

What ever dude.
And if they posted that you would claim it was photo shopped. Nothing would ever convince you.

You believe only Tucker is brave / honest enough to want to interview Putin.
Everybody else is lying.

We are done here.
Its clearly you are a waste of time.



Enjoy being a cuck, I mean its in your name.
Weirdo.
 
What ever dude.
And if they posted that you would claim it was photo shopped. Nothing would ever convince you.

You believe only Tucker is brave / honest enough to want to interview Putin.
Everybody else is lying.

We are done here.
Its clearly you are a waste of time.



Enjoy being a cuck, I mean its in your name.
Weirdo.
Dick tuck noted
 
I never said that it was hard to fathom. You are making things up for some odd reason.

And yes, I know that you "Dunno" - that much is obvious. <45>
Well not much else to say if you do want propaganda, as long as it affirms your beliefs. Have fun not watching what we all know you're going to watch, I guess.

Not everybody is as terrified of more information as you seem to be.
 
Well not much else to say if you do want propaganda, as long as it affirms your beliefs. Have fun not watching what we all know you're going to watch, I guess.

Not everybody is as terrified of more information as you seem to be.

I never said I wouldn't watch LOL - you folks are so weird. You people keep claiming I told people not to watch and that I'm not going to watch. I never once said either of those things.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?
 
i mean, i guess your right. He should be aloud to fly off an have sex with putler.

Look dude... You might not agree with it, which is fine.

But running around arresting people who to do stuff you don't agree with is a slippery slope you don't want to go down.

Such things can turn around the other direction as well.

I am interested in what Putin might have to say. I know almost of it will be lies or whatever. He's going to try to demonize the west and rationalize his actions. But what else is going to come out of it? Any surprises? Who knows. Likely not, there's really no way to rationalize his actions in Ukraine.

But I prefer to hear it and make my own opinions. The latest movement of just censoring and blocking all opposing views is completely retarded.

I'd support a western journalist interviewing the scum from Hamas as well. Let them run their mouth and make fools of themselves on the world stage.

And in that scenario, you're more like to get a Leftist Journalist from CNN or MSNBC.

Would you want that journalist arrested too?
 
So unedited interviews are "propaganda", and heavily edited ones to push a narrative are "real journalism"? Got it.

What the fuck is an unedited interview? as in live interview?

Tucker went there several days ago before releasing the interview which is not going to be live, that implies they are either going to rehearse it or they simply can refuse to release it.

For example when Jorge Ramos went to interview Maduro, Maduro got pissed and detained him then took over the recordings
 
What the fuck is an unedited interview? as in live interview?

Tucker went there several days ago before releasing the interview which is not going to be live, that implies they are either going to rehearse it or they simply can refuse to release it.

For example when Jorge Ramos went to interview Maduro, Maduro got pissed and detained him then took over the recordings
It's not an ambiguous term. "Unedited" means not edited. You film the interview and release what you filmed without chopping it up or cutting anything.
 
What’s interesting is the complete polar opposite responses you get..

“oh my God, I can’t believe you’re gonna interview Putin”
and on the exact same time say
“we’ve asked for interviews and he won’t give them to us, so don’t say other journalist haven’t tried”


Did Putin choose to do the interview with Tucker because he knew Tucker would be sympathetic? Obviously
 
Back
Top