So,
1. You disagree with someone before they've even been given the opportunity to convey information (not that we don't know who Putin is)
2. You predecide that Tucker is going to be Putin's mouthpiece for a nefarious narrative to subvert our own narrative
3. You don't think Putin should be able to choose who he's willing to interview with...????
4. "I don't have a problem with it..." ??? Everything you've outlined states that you have a problem with it unless it's the exact parameters you approve of.
Bro, you're a walking contradiction lol
I have no problem with Tucker or anyone interviewing Putin. The man should be free to convey his perspective on Russia and their actions as a nation as he sees fit. Tucker has every right not only to interview him but to conduct it in the manner in which he sees fit. You can do with the information what you will, sounds like you've already made up your mind on what to do with it.
I'll say it again: Maybe if some subversive mouth piece for Iraq had interviewed Saddam we would have had more resistance against trillions of dollars and thousands of lives being wasted on a fake premise.
That isn't really an accurate take on these quotes.
This dude actually said the opposite of what you insinuated. It's pretty plainly stated that he thinks Tucker is less full of shit than the other outlets they won't bother interviewing with. Russian's also just speak bluntly when correcting the record (interview requests), it isn't a 'gotcha' like it is in America. Funny how Tucker's a traitor for interviewing Putin, but when he says he's the only dude who will do it, all of a sudden there's numerous traitors on the left who have been attempting to interview Putin, but only to give him a handy, not a BJ.