International Tucker Carlson in Russia to interview Vladimir Putin UPDATE - Also Dugin

[CantCucktheTuck]

When did news agencies claim it?

editor for BBC claims it here. (no proof)


I'm not going to do the googling for you. There are several news agencies that claim they were turned down for interviews. I would like to see some proof for that, so that I can determine just how hard they sought an interview. I think, more than likely, they are full shit about trying to interview putin.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Interfax is a Russian news site based in Moscow Russia and pro Putin.

Peskov is the spokesperson for the Kremlin.

Dmitry Peskov - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Peskow claims western news wanted to interview Putin but they have been turned down..
I think we can believe this since it correspond with what western news also says. They have tried to interview Putin but got turned down.

So both the west and Kremlin says the same thing here.

I guess you can take their word for it if you want to.

 

[USA!USA!]

I thought we can't believe anything that Russians say, but you're certainly willing to take Peskov's word for it when he says something you like.

"Handpicked" is what literally every world leader does for interviews. Christ, Biden has to "handpick" individual questions from a card with the person's name, picture and what they're going to ask before calling on them, and that is from an extremely pro Biden media so they don't even accidentally ask him something difficult. They plant fake questions in town halls ffs.

He already said one of the conditions was that the interview be released in full, unedited, and there is 0 reason to trust any of our MSM with that request when they regularly cut out parts that don't fit what they want, will match up different answers with different questions to change context.

It's not exactly a burn on Tucker for someone to say he's the only one on the list of requests that they can actually trust to air an interview without fucking with it. It's not like he can sue NBC for splicing up an interview to say whatever they want it to.

He is backing up what plenty in the western media have also said - and what is obvious. Why would they just never ask? lol

 

[lsa]

I guess you can take their word for it if you want to.

Let me get this straight.
Putins press secretary confirms that western medias has been turned down to interview Putin.
Western medias, claims they have been turned down.

So are both the western media and Putins press secretary lying?
Both says the same thing.

 

[nostradumbass]

He is backing up what plenty in the western media have also said - and what is obvious. Why would they just never ask? lol

Why wouldn't Tucker, and why would it be a negative to be the only one who can be trusted to air an interview in full and not splice and edit to fit a narrative?

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Let me get this straight.
Putins press secretary confirms that western medias has been turned down to interview Putin.
Western medias, claims they have been turned down.

So are both the western media and Putins press secretary lying?
Both says the same thing.

So we trust the media and putin now?

Be honest...how many of these did you believe at first?

Spoiler: media lies

1. Russian collusion
2. Jussie Smollett
3. Bubba Wallace garage pull
4. Covington kids
5. Kavanaugh rape
6. Trump pee tape
7. Covid lab leak was a conspiracy theory
8. Border agents whipped migrants.
9. Trump saved nuclear secrets at Mar-a-Lago
10. Steele Dossier
11. Russian bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan
12.Trump said drinking bleach would fight covid
13. Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation
14. Muslim travel ban
15. Trump built cages for migrant kids
16. Trump tax cuts benefited only the rich.
17. SUV killed parade marchers
18. Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo
19. Don't say gay was in a bill
20. Putin price hike
21.Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and not for humans
22. Mostly peaceful protests
23. Officer Sicknick was murdered by protesters
24. BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player
25. Trump overpowered secret service for wheel of "The Beast"

 

[lsa]

So we trust the media and putin now?

Be honest...how many of these did you believe at first?

Spoiler: media lies

1. Russian collusion
2. Jussie Smollett
3. Bubba Wallace garage pull
4. Covington kids
5. Kavanaugh rape
6. Trump pee tape
7. Covid lab leak was a conspiracy theory
8. Border agents whipped migrants.
9. Trump saved nuclear secrets at Mar-a-Lago
10. Steele Dossier
11. Russian bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan
12.Trump said drinking bleach would fight covid
13. Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation
14. Muslim travel ban
15. Trump built cages for migrant kids
16. Trump tax cuts benefited only the rich.
17. SUV killed parade marchers
18. Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo
19. Don't say gay was in a bill
20. Putin price hike
21.Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and not for humans
22. Mostly peaceful protests
23. Officer Sicknick was murdered by protesters
24. BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player
25. Trump overpowered secret service for wheel of "The Beast"

So we cant trust Putin here and we cant trust the media. So we cant trust Tucker either and there is no reason to interview Putin because he will lie and so will Tucker.

 

[USA!USA!]

Why wouldn't Tucker, and why would it be a negative to be the only one who can be trusted to air an interview in full and not splice and edit to fit a narrative?

The free press is not supposed to be the friend of dictators.

Tucker is very popular in Russia and was the only approved person to interview Putin.

Put two and two together, man.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

So we cant trust Putin here and we cant trust the media. So we cant trust Tucker either and there is no reason to interview Putin because he will lie and so will Tucker.

Dont' trust tucker to do what? Post the interview unedited? I guess we will find out about that. I already assume that putin is gonna lie about some things.

 

[lsa]

Dont' trust tucker to do what? Post the interview unedited? I guess we will find out about that. I already assume that putin is gonna lie about some things.

This is what you said
"So we trust the media and putin now?"
So we cant trust Putin, he is lying.
Tucker is media, and media is also lying.

So why bother?
They are all liars...

I know it hurts you that even Kremlin confirmed they have turned down western medias, so suddenly they are liars.

 

[chardog]

So we cant trust Putin here and we cant trust the media. So we cant trust Tucker either and there is no reason to interview Putin because he will lie and so will Tucker.

as if zelensky should have a monopoly on lying

if he's lying, he'll get called out, just like how tucker is getting called out.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

This is what you said
"So we trust the media and putin now?"
So we cant trust Putin, he is lying.
Tucker is media, and media is also lying.

So why bother?
They are all liars...

I know it hurts you that even Kremlin confirmed they have turned down western medias, so suddenly they are liars.

Tucker is not the mainstream media you goof. Why would you think it "hurts me" if the Kremlin is lying or exaggerating?

 

[lsa]

as if zelensky should have a monopoly on lying

if he's lying, he'll get called out, just like how tucker is getting called out.

Dude..
First of the poster has been going on about how western media is lying about trying to interview Putin. He wanted proof.

I posted proof, Putins press secretary confirming they have been turning down western medias request to interview Putin.

Suddenly they are all liars and we cant trust anything they say.

So I dont know why you bring up Zely here...
Because it has nothing to do what we are talking about.

 

[eddymotto]

So we cant trust Putin here and we cant trust the media. So we cant trust Tucker either and there is no reason to interview Putin because he will lie and so will Tucker.

you have pretty much cracked the code

usually the only person you can really trust is an anonymous YouTuber that has a screen name like "donkeydick69" (joking aside - that dude has some serious inside knowledge and always tells it like it is which, coincidently, matches quite well with my worldview)

 

[lsa]

Tucker is not the mainstream media you goof. Why would you think it "hurts me" if the Kremlin is lying or exaggerating?

Derp.
You asked for proof that Western media wanted to interview Putin.
I posted info from Putins press secretary confirming what western media has said.

Then they are all liars and we cant trust them.. according to you

Because this proves Tucker was BSing when claiming only he wanted to interview Putin.
You cant handle that.

I mean you are called CantCucktheTuck.
You are so deep in it its almost sad.

 

[THEfightsAREfixed]

dont care, not into political media stunts or whatever

 

[emefer]

editor for BBC claims it here. (no proof)


I'm not going to do the googling for you. There are several news agencies that claim they were turned down for interviews. I would like to see some proof for that, so that I can determine just how hard they sought an interview. I think, more than likely, they are full shit about trying to interview putin.

I didn’t see that. So they made a response refuting tucker. I see no reason for them to lie about.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Derp.
You asked for proof that Western media wanted to interview Putin.
I posted info from Putins press secretary confirming what western media has said.

Then they are all liars and we cant trust them.. according to you

Because this proves Tucker was BSing when claiming only he wanted to interview Putin.
You cant handle that.

I mean you are called CantCucktheTuck.
You are so deep in it its almost sad.

yes....I said I would like to see some proof from the media outlets who are claiming to have requested interviews and were denied.

you responded with a press release from the kremlin as "proof", and you are actively arguing that the Kremlin statement is the gospel truth.

save your shit tier insults for reddit.

 

[nostradumbass]

The free press is not supposed to be the friend of dictators.

Tucker is very popular in Russia and was the only approved person to interview Putin.

Put two and two together, man.

I think YOU should put two and two together and realize that we have our own untrustworthy propaganda machine that cannot be trusted to air interviews they don't heavily edit, and our own president doesn't even do interviews with our own media if they don't have the questions in advance and full editorial control, so why the hell would that not apply to foreign media?

Do yiu think requesting that an interview be aired unedited is unreasonable? Tucker has requested interviews with Zelensky, but Zelensky "handpicks" who he interviews with.

 

[Sinister]

So,

1. You disagree with someone before they've even been given the opportunity to convey information (not that we don't know who Putin is)
2. You predecide that Tucker is going to be Putin's mouthpiece for a nefarious narrative to subvert our own narrative
3. You don't think Putin should be able to choose who he's willing to interview with...????
4. "I don't have a problem with it..." ??? Everything you've outlined states that you have a problem with it unless it's the exact parameters you approve of.

Bro, you're a walking contradiction lol

I have no problem with Tucker or anyone interviewing Putin. The man should be free to convey his perspective on Russia and their actions as a nation as he sees fit. Tucker has every right not only to interview him but to conduct it in the manner in which he sees fit. You can do with the information what you will, sounds like you've already made up your mind on what to do with it.

I'll say it again: Maybe if some subversive mouth piece for Iraq had interviewed Saddam we would have had more resistance against trillions of dollars and thousands of lives being wasted on a fake premise.



That isn't really an accurate take on these quotes.



This dude actually said the opposite of what you insinuated. It's pretty plainly stated that he thinks Tucker is less full of shit than the other outlets they won't bother interviewing with. Russian's also just speak bluntly when correcting the record (interview requests), it isn't a 'gotcha' like it is in America. Funny how Tucker's a traitor for interviewing Putin, but when he says he's the only dude who will do it, all of a sudden there's numerous traitors on the left who have been attempting to interview Putin, but only to give him a handy, not a BJ.

Lolwut? Their contention is that a guy implicated in a massive disinformation lawsuit who was outed with damning evidence of not only knowingly deceiving his audience, but loathing them at the same time, who also suggested that reporting accurate election results should result in the firing of a reporter, is genuine!?

Yeah, their take is cleverly worded to insinuate that Tucker is more likely to be on their side. Just as he is with Orban. Fascists like talking to people who like fascists.

Tucker will be on his knees, for certain, trying to cling to relevance after Faux News did everything they could to keep him from testifying under oath.