- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 54,805
- Reaction score
- 12,172
It's not an ambiguous term. "Unedited" means not edited. You film the interview and release what you filmed without chopping it up or cutting anything.
You mean uncut interview
It's not an ambiguous term. "Unedited" means not edited. You film the interview and release what you filmed without chopping it up or cutting anything.
No, I don't. I appreciate the attempt to save face, but cut means shortened or censored, edited means altered in any way.You mean uncut interview
No, I don't. I appreciate the attempt to save face, but cut means shortened or censored, edited means altered in any way.
Lol, 37 pages when the interview wasn't released, and now that it is, thread dried up.
Look dude... You might not agree with it, which is fine.
But running around arresting people who to do stuff you don't agree with is a slippery slope you don't want to go down.
Such things can turn around the other direction as well.
I am interested in what Putin might have to say. I know almost of it will be lies or whatever. He's going to try to demonize the west and rationalize his actions. But what else is going to come out of it? Any surprises? Who knows. Likely not, there's really no way to rationalize his actions in Ukraine.
But I prefer to hear it and make my own opinions. The latest movement of just censoring and blocking all opposing views is completely retarded.
I'd support a western journalist interviewing the scum from Hamas as well. Let them run their mouth and make fools of themselves on the world stage.
And in that scenario, you're more like to get a Leftist Journalist from CNN or MSNBC.
Would you want that journalist arrested too?
If they are my money's on Putin getting some motorboating in before the end of the interview.Will they both be shirtless at least?
How is he a traitor?He's a giant fuckhead and a traitor to the US.
Say what you want about Putin and his motivations but it's comically embarrassing to compare this guy's cognitive ability with the two geriatric brain-melts being offered up in America.
![]()
He is trusted. To spread their narrative without question. BFD that he's getting an interview. Does anyone expect anything other than a puff piece?Why wouldn't Tucker, and why would it be a negative to be the only one who can be trusted to air an interview in full and not splice and edit to fit a narrative?
Is this the updated list? Have you sent these to @Whippy McGee so he can update his spreadsheet?So we trust the media and putin now?
Be honest...how many of these did you believe at first?
1. Russian collusion
2. Jussie Smollett
3. Bubba Wallace garage pull
4. Covington kids
5. Kavanaugh rape
6. Trump pee tape
7. Covid lab leak was a conspiracy theory
8. Border agents whipped migrants.
9. Trump saved nuclear secrets at Mar-a-Lago
10. Steele Dossier
11. Russian bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan
12.Trump said drinking bleach would fight covid
13. Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation
14. Muslim travel ban
15. Trump built cages for migrant kids
16. Trump tax cuts benefited only the rich.
17. SUV killed parade marchers
18. Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo
19. Don't say gay was in a bill
20. Putin price hike
21.Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and not for humans
22. Mostly peaceful protests
23. Officer Sicknick was murdered by protesters
24. BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player
25. Trump overpowered secret service for wheel of "The Beast"