Trump Dump / War Train vol 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 429137
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
lmao. Incompetence, incompetence. Make America facepalm again.

It's funny but it's the equivalent of jaywalking.
 
You know what jumps out to me about the speech story and Trump's wife?

There was a time when a candidates wife was off limits.

I don't look at that story and have a problem with Trump or his wife, I have a problem with the media, as it claims Trump is lowering the conversation by race-baiting, and at the same time going after the wife of a politician.

What's next media, you going after his kids next?
 
He doesn't let others dictate who he is or what he says. That's a strong sign of integrity if you ask me.
I don't know man if the only things trump supporters have to go on is his integrity credibility then im not sure what to say :(
 
You know what jumps out to me about the speech story and Trump's wife?

There was a time when a candidates wife was off limits.

I don't look at that story and have a problem with Trump or his wife, I have a problem with the media, as it claims Trump is lowering the conversation by race-baiting, and at the same time going after the wife of a politician.

What's next media, you going after his kids next?
Not only did Trump already call off the bets by bringing wives into this race every time the opportunity came up, a speaker at the RNC committing plagiarism is a story, period.
 
I don't know man if the only things trump supporters have to go on is his integrity credibility then im not sure what to say :(

His biggest asset is his competence but a hater like you would probably be in denial about that.
 
He's consistently negotiated deals and by a very large margin came out on top against other very heavy hitting successful people. He's not the most honest guy in the world, but he has miles more integrity and conscience than Killery.

lol search Sherdog, but the numbers came out about how much he was paying for TV advertising time: more than any other candidate. The great deal maker, and a TV insider, couldn't even negotiate a hard hitting deal in his own industry. You guys are willfully ignoring a lot of his business when you make statements like this.
 
Are you saying Trump is credible?

tumblr_lx9jb1SPMr1qdrpdr.gif


(Sorry don't be mad I had to)
And H-> is?
Q-poll-Hillary-Word-Cloud-620x390.png
 
Not only did Trump already call off the bets by bringing wives into this race every time the opportunity came up, a speaker at the RNC committing plagiarism is a story, period.

Oh I see. So if Trump says the same thing, that the media lowered the bar first, you going to stick to that logic?

I love this game where we equivocate when it suits us, but then cry foul when it doesn't.
 
His biggest asset is his competence but a hater like you would probably be in denial about that.
have you seen his convention or trump university? I don't know about his competence
 
You know, maybe I didn't give the wall a fair shot when I thought it was useless. You reinforce that, bolt it down and put a roof on it... no Mexicans are hiding out on his Hollywood star.

they should give one to Cruz too for the way he trolled the convention
 
Oh I see. So if Trump says the same thing, that the media lowered the bar first, you going to stick to that logic?

I love this game where we equivocate when it suits us, but then cry foul when it doesn't.

What are you saying here? This doesn't make any sense. Fawlty is saying Trump got the wive-battering ball rolling when he attacked Cruz's wife in several ways that were low, even for politics.
 
He doesn't let others dictate who he is or what he says. That's a strong sign of integrity if you ask me.

Could also be a strong sign of narcissism and megalomania.

Here's what doesn't point to "integrity" where I come from: Three wives, four Chapter 11's and being named in over 150 federal law suits.
 
Oh I see. So if Trump says the same thing, that the media lowered the bar first, you going to stick to that logic?

I love this game where we equivocate when it suits us, but then cry foul when it doesn't.
The first thing I said was a soft ball, sure, but I'm more than covered by the second part of my post, which you are too much of a pussy to address, because it nails you cold. Address it or fuck off.
 
What are you saying here? This doesn't make any sense. Fawlty is saying Trump got the wive-battering ball rolling when he attacked Cruz's wife in several ways that were low, even for politics.

So when someone says they are voting for Trump, because they hate Hillary Clinton, is that a quality rational?

Because if it is not, then you are trying to have your cake and eat it too.

You don't get to say anyone who is voting for Trump, because they hate Clinton is stupid, and claim that the media's actions can be left without judgement, because Trump sucks.

They are the same argument, they are both true, or both false.
 
The first thing I said was a soft ball, sure, but I'm more than covered by the second part of my post, which you are too much of a pussy to address, because it nails you cold. Address it or fuck off.

OK, every first lady in the last 50 years has spoke at their convention, and it didn't make them fair game then.
 
Could also be a strong sign of narcissism and megalomania.

Here's what doesn't point to "integrity" where I come from: Three wives, four Chapter 11's and being named in over 150 federal law suits.

He has taken responsibility for his two failed marriages citing he neglected them for his work. That's integrity. 4 chapter 11s out of how many business ventures? In a time and a place where many companies were going bankrupt. And Trump has won most of those lawsuits as far as I know.
 
I have to respond to this because your post to me makes no damn sense. I'm talking about wives being fair game.

OK, every first lady in the last 50 years has spoke at their convention, and it didn't make them fair game then.

If their husbands had attacked their opponent's wives in ways that EVERYONE thought was dirty... they would have been. Or, at the very least, there would be nobody whining when people criticized their own wives for plagiarism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,149
Messages
58,344,193
Members
176,009
Latest member
wmmaf
Back
Top