Violence/Genocide: Do not condone violence or genocide on a person or group of people. You are free to attack a person or groups ideas but you are crossing the line when calling for violence. This will be heavily enforced in threads with breaking news involving victims.

The War Room Bet Thread V4

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Lead, Nov 16, 2019.

?

Best bet(s) settled in the last bet thread (see closed bets section in post 3)

  1. Bet 32 Lead v. JameRussler

    5.9%
  2. Bet 27 HomerThompson v. JamesRussler

    5.9%
  3. Bet 38 SBJJ v. GOATER

    11.8%
  4. Bet 37 Jack V Savage v. waiguoren

    52.9%
  5. Bet 33: HereticBD v. 44nutman

    5.9%
  6. Bet 35: waiguoren v. Pelosi2016

    23.5%
  7. Bet 30: Jack V Savage v. SBJJ

    11.8%
  8. Bet 29: waiguoren v. PolishHeadlock

    41.2%
  9. Bet 39: lowmanproblems v. JamesRussler

    5.9%
  10. Bet 31: waiguoren v. andnowweknow

    29.4%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    74,422
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    So, looks like @Corn Pop Hombre is going to first look to see if he can find anything, then fail to find anything, then not take the bet or admit that he was making shit up. Nice.
     
    kpt018 likes this.
  2. Corn Pop Hombre Purple Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2020
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    You know good and well you've talked a lot of shit about bernie. I'm doing some preliminary searching but this is really dependent on how long I want to spend nauseating myself looking at your previous posts. You have 74,000 posts on here. You're trying to make the calculation that I'll give up digging through your thousands and thousands of posts before I find what I'm talking about. We'll see.

    I know you're a stand-for-nothing liberal that never wants to make any strong statements in any one direction, so it's gonna be a little tricky, but I'm sure I'll find something.
     
  3. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    74,422
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    Bullshit.

    You can narrow the search, bud. And I'm happy to bet that I can find, let's say at least three (negotiable), posts of me saying that there's little difference between the two in 2016 or 2015.

    I make lots of strong statements. For example, I think Trump is one of the worst presidents we've had. I've not been shy about thinking that Gabbard was ridiculously unqualified. Etc. I've never made any strong anti-Bernie statements because I like Bernie. If you're sure you'll find something, let's bet.
     
  4. Corn Pop Hombre Purple Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2020
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    [​IMG]
    WOAAAAH!! No way Jack!? How many NYT columns and books did you read, and how many multivariate regressions did you run before coming to this reality shattering conclusion?
     
    Whippy McGee likes this.
  5. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    74,422
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    So the point is that if there's a position where I think a strong statement is justified, I make strong statements. If there isn't, I don't. There's no "no strong statement" policy on my end. You ready to bet or at least admit that you looked and couldn't find anything that backed up your claim/did find stuff that backed up mine?
     
  6. Corn Pop Hombre Purple Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2020
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    In one post you: 1) Said Bernie is not a serious candidate because 1A) he doesn't really have a serious chance to win, then you 2) Compared Bernie Sanders to an ill-prepared student that doesn't really know what he's talking about

    Bernie would go on to win 49% of the vote, but he's "not a serious candidate" and doesn't have a "serious chance to win" despite very clearly, demonstrably having a chance to win. Bernie Sanders has also been reading up on, and fighting for these issues for decades and decades, yet you compared him to a student reading a book for a book report the night before it's due, characterizing him as ill-prepared and ill-informed.

    These are very clearly attacks against Bernie. But I'm sure in your mind you were just calmly and rationally explaining reality.

    Bernie Sanders "isn't a serious candidate" but no no Jack, that wasn't an attack, definitely not. Keep lying, keep gaslighting.
     
  7. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    74,422
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    First, let me take a second to call attention to the fact that you ducked the bet and the judging. Second, let me further note that Bernie did not, in fact, win 49% of the vote. Third, here's the context:

    And finally, in the post where you said I'm attacking Bernie, I note that he is more likable than Clinton and that I am in closer agreement with Bernie ideologically than I am with Clinton. This is exactly why I wanted third parties to judge. You're being extremely dishonest by calling that an "attack."
     
  8. Corn Pop Hombre Purple Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2020
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    No, dishonest is you doing exactly what I said you would do, before this even started. I found a clear case of you attacking Bernie, then you'd twist things around and explain why it wasn't an actual attack. If saying a candidate isn't a "serious candidate" isn't an attack, then I don't know what is. You spent the whole 2016 election cycle talking up Hillary Clinton and explaining why all criticism against her is right wing propaganda, and Bernie Sanders isn't a serious candidate, but you're the real lefty huh Jack?

    Btw that thread is such a clown show for you. Its really embarrassing. "Money doesn't influence a politicians decisions" ahahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahah

    You've got some truly galaxy brain-dead takes over the years my friend.
    "Money doesn't influence a politicians decisions" - JVS
    "Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton have no real differences" - JVS

    [​IMG]

    ahahhahahahahahaahha. Holy shit. Here's your liberal super intellectual everyone.
     
    Sketch and Whippy McGee like this.
  9. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    74,422
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    You mean you're doing what I said you would do, and I proposed having a third-party judge to prevent it. You declined because you know you're full of shit.
     
  10. Corn Pop Hombre Purple Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2020
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    I told you I would find cases of you shit-talking Bernie. I found them. Every regular in the WR is familiar with your shilling for Hillary Clinton and your bashing of Bernie Sanders. But you're so shameless you'll just gaslight everyone about it and pretend we're all crazy and our memories are all wrong.
     
    Sketch and Whippy McGee like this.
  11. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    74,422
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    Your one example of me "shit-talking Bernie" is a post in which I said he was more likable than Clinton and that I agreed with him more ideologically. I was clarifying for you that when another poster said he wasn't a serious candidate, he wasn't referring to his positions but to his chances of winning. Anyone can clearly see all that so there's no point in lying about it.
     
  12. Corn Pop Hombre Purple Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2020
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    Are you unwilling to concede that one post can contain multiple points? Do we really need to get this granular jack?

    Yes I can read. I obviously see that you said you liked him. You can say that you liked him, while also attacking him. Calling him "not a serious candidate" when he very clearly was a serious candidate and could have won, is OBVIOUSLY an attack. Keep lying, twisting, distorting and gaslighting. I don't know why I waste my time. It's a pattern with you going back for years. Virtually all you do is gaslight the left and gaslight everyone that calls you out for your bullshit and establishment shilling

    "Money has no influence on a politicians decisions"
    "Bernie and Hillary have no real differences"

    No one should ever take anything you have to say about politics seriously.
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2020
  13. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    74,422
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    Yes, but it's hard to call a post that is so positive about someone an "attack." If we're being honest. Especially since you've also claimed that I'm a big Clinton fan.

    No, it obviously is not since I was clarifying for you what the other person was saying. He wasn't saying that Bernie wasn't a serious candidate because of his positions on issues; he was saying it because he was out of the race by that point.

    Everything I've said here is true, while you've been lying your ass off in two threads.
     
  14. Whippy McGee Meme Master

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2014
    Messages:
    11,800
    Likes Received:
    4,446
    Location:
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Dude.... too much!

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Overtures Known Agitator

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,830
    Likes Received:
    868
    @all caps and I have an account bet.

    If Biden wins, I stay. If Trump wins he stays. Vice versa. Just a regular account bet.

    No way I'll lose. And if I do, I'm coming back as a troll.

    @Lead this one is ready to go.
     
    all caps likes this.
  16. all caps Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    23,808
    Likes Received:
    2,358
    Location:
    Langley, VA
    Confirmed
     
  17. Lead /Led/ like the panda Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    38,563
    Likes Received:
    1,735
    Location:
    Around Pittsburgh
    We don’t officiate account bets. We could do a year sig/ av bet or you guys just have your own gentlemen’s agreement without it being officiated.
     
  18. Overtures Known Agitator

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,830
    Likes Received:
    868

    Well it's here on record and we can bump it when the time comes.
     
  19. Lead /Led/ like the panda Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    38,563
    Likes Received:
    1,735
    Location:
    Around Pittsburgh
    That’s all good. Just remember, it isn’t officiated or included in rankings. A place to link it for shame I suppose is fine.
     
  20. Limbo Pete Fake History Man

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    24,782
    Likes Received:
    1,626
    Flashback to Wai thinking he could absorb @PolishHeadlock2 's account lol
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.