That gives a built-in odds advantage to the person betting high.Pansies.
A bit like that should pay one (1) bitcoin from the loser to the winner.
About 12.
I'll delete my account and jump off a building if Biden somehow wins.Trump got 46.1% of the vote in 2016. I'll bet you that Biden gets more than 46.1% of the vote in 2020. I'm flexible on the terms. Six months sig would work for me, though.
I'll delete my account and jump off a building if Biden somehow wins.
Sure, you can change the sig to my deleted account if Biden somehow wins.OK, but what about my offer?
I'm interested to know if you really believe what you're saying or you're just trying to be a good cheerleader.
Sure, you can change the sig to my deleted account if Biden somehow wins.
@Lead you heard the man. Make it official. 6 month avatar bet, Richie wins if Trump gets +78 or better in the electoral college. If Trump gets +77 or less against his opponent, I win.
Judging by his account (12 months old) and the current bets he has outstanding (3 months), I’d cap a bet currently with him at 3 months max ((account age/2) - outstanding bets = bet capacity) If you are okay with that, I’ll format it and get both of your approvals.
Agree
Agree@Prokofievian v. @Richie Madano
1. Donald Trump will win the 2020 election by a margin of at least 78 or more electoral votes.
2. @Richie Madano - For, @Prokofievian - Against
3. 11/04/2020 tentatively (Election day)
4. Avatar bet
5. 3 months
6a. If Trump isn’t on the ballot for 2020, the bet is null.
6b. We will assume there are no rogue electoral votes and they will vote as assigned by their state.
6c. If Election Day is moved to a later date, the bet is null unless the participants have it re-approved.
6d. The margin above is based on the opposing candidate that receives the 2nd most electoral votes in the event Trump wins.
I added some items under 6 to make this easier to call in the event something weird happens. It’s 2020 so I’m assuming for more crazy
Please quote this post and give your approval or let me know what you want revised.
@Prokofievian v. @Richie Madano
1. Donald Trump will win the 2020 election by a margin of at least 78 or more electoral votes.
2. @Richie Madano - For, @Prokofievian - Against
3. 11/04/2020 tentatively (Election day)
4. Avatar bet
5. 3 months
6a. If Trump isn’t on the ballot for 2020, the bet is null.
6b. We will assume there are no rogue electoral votes and they will vote as assigned by their state.
6c. If Election Day is moved to a later date, the bet is null unless the participants have it re-approved.
6d. The margin above is based on the opposing candidate that receives the 2nd most electoral votes in the event Trump wins.
I added some items under 6 to make this easier to call in the event something weird happens. It’s 2020 so I’m assuming for more crazy
Please quote this post and give your approval or let me know what you want revised.
@Prokofievian v. @Richie Madano
1. Donald Trump will win the 2020 election by a margin of at least 78 or more electoral votes.
2. @Richie Madano - For, @Prokofievian - Against
3. 11/04/2020 tentatively (Election day)
4. Avatar bet
5. 3 months
6a. If Trump isn’t on the ballot for 2020, the bet is null.
6b. We will assume there are no rogue electoral votes and they will vote as assigned by their state.
6c. If Election Day is moved to a later date, the bet is null unless the participants have it re-approved.
6d. The margin above is based on the opposing candidate that receives the 2nd most electoral votes in the event Trump wins.
I added some items under 6 to make this easier to call in the event something weird happens. It’s 2020 so I’m assuming for more crazy
Please quote this post and give your approval or let me know what you want revised.
Agree
I agree. Is it final now? Is it waiguoren official? Or do we have to agree with each other's agreements, and so on, and so forth?
If I were so inclined to go back and find your posts attacking Bernie in the 2016 cycle, I could find them. You did it plenty. You can stop lying now bud.
My concern is that you'll twist your attacks and criticisms on Bernie and try and explain how the negative shit you said about him wasn't actually an attack.You want to bet about it? My concern is that you'll have a ridiculous definition of "attacking" though I think even that dishonest tactic might fail. I can post multiple examples of me noting that there's no significant difference.
My concern is that you'll twist your attacks and criticisms on Bernie and try and explain how the negative shit you said about him wasn't actually an attack.
My concern is that you'll twist your attacks and criticisms on Bernie and try and explain how the negative shit you said about him wasn't actually an attack.