Rousey said 9/11 was inside job on Rogan podcast in 2011???

WTC 7 is weird. That has always made me wonder a bit about 9/11, but then you realize how many people would have had to be in on it, and how three buildings could be perfectly wire for controlled demolition without anyone knowing, and it's very implausible that a conspiracy could have happened. But it's understandable that someone could see some info on building 7 and start to question the official narrative. I give Rowdy a pass.

Why would anyone question Building Seven? Do you have any idea how much damage that building took?

A million pounds of rubble took out an entire corner of the building, which blazed for hours until it finally collapsed.

Truthers never show video footage from the damaged side, though.
 
Just saw a share on FB, I didn't listen to the clip but apparently Ronda said 9/11 was an inside job when guesting on a Rogan podcast.

Sorry if this has been on thread before, just thought it was interesting and wondered if she has been asked about this again since?

It was definitely not done by the bearded man in the cave and his merry men like we were lead to believe. It was done by people in very high places (probably Mosad) for two reasons: 1. To get the public approval to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan because they had WMDs. Which really meant they arrived in Araq and immediately took over all the oil fields a pumped billions of barrels of oil out of the country. In Afghanistan it was all about the opium trade and the lithium vanes worth trillions of dollars. How do I know all of this? YouTube baby!
 
Not to mention that it has been proven in court that the bbc announced
The collapse of one of the towers more than 20 minutes before it actually fell.
 
Not to mention that it has been proven in court that the bbc announced
The collapse of one of the towers more than 20 minutes before it actually fell.

LOL. So instead of thinking it was a simple mistake that happens on every broadcast of every news station daily, you think the news anchor on BBC had the inside info? You sound retarded.
 
You're definition of a critical thinker is someone who swallows the official story released about 20 minutes after the attack before an investigation has been carried out and doesn't question anything?

I don't think you need to swallow any story uncritically to not believe in fairy tales.

You don't need to travel to the moon to know it's not made of green cheese and one doesn't need to believe entirely in any official story in order to know with a certainty that only tardboys think 9/11 is a false flag operation.
 
Steins gonna Stein

484698_377598439012688_1253034845_n.jpg
 
lol at people thinking our government is competent enough to strap bombs on a building and get away with it

No but the Jewish government are experts. They've gotten plenty of demolition practice in Gaza
 
No offense, but the mounds of information out there proving there was a controlled demolition is light-years more convincing.

There are mounds of nonsense, which have been packaged and repackaged over the years but still do not stand up to scrutiny.

Truthers have been doing their best to trick demolitions experts into confirming their claims but anyone who knows demolition knows this wasn't it.
 
lol, theres no real point in arguing this with anyone...people that are "youre an idiot if you believe it was an inside job" " no way that could ever happen" controlled demolition...complete nonsense" are not going to be swayed by someone telling them but only by figuring it out for themselves....

theres more than enough information out there for anyone that is objective about it going in, I wasnt at first....I was all on board with the "get the muslims!" when it first happened and I argued the same way the aforementioned group of people do....annnnd I feel utterly shameful that I did, knowing what I do now

Controlled Demolition impossible??? explain how you get molten steel on the bottom of both WTC towers when there was NOTHING in either the planes or the building itself that could possibly melt steel into a liquid....the pools burned for weeks I think even over a month after the crash....

we could get into the rule of nature about how EVERYTHING that falls, takes the path of least resistance and nothing built to withstand multiple impacts from jetliners falls at the rate of near freefall speed

or you can get into how its known and admitted that WTC7 was a controlled demo and that the two towers fell in exactly the same manner, and in accordance to EVERY other controlled demolition in the history of controlled demolitions

if thats not enough for you .....you can try explaining how 4, 7 ton titanium alloy rolls royce jet airplane engines completely disinigrate((sp)) on impact ((the pentagon)) BUT there is enough of the wreckage of the plane left ((supposedly)) that they could, using DNA, identify the remains of like 150 of the 200 passengers((I dont remember the exact number of passengers but its a ratio akin to that))oh yeah...also theres literally no visual evidence of that plane, there was again nothing that could destroy those engines both on the plane itself or inside the pentagon where it hit

after that, please tell us "idiots" how Osama's lackies managed to get Norad to stand down while those 4 supposed planes were in the air....

they when youre done with that....explain how all that, plus pages and pages and pages more inconsistancies, mistruths, outright lies and extreme coincidences could all happen in one day all at more or less one time

I can only hope that those of you calling everyone else idiots and saying "Thats impossible" come to feel the same way I do about when it was me saying those things......utterly ashamed

You're an idiot.

Back up. Why does anyone even need the towers to come down? Do you think that if the planes were crashed into them and the towers didn't come down that there would have been less of a response. If so, then you're an idiot.

The U.S. was at war the minute those plans were hijacked and rammed into buildings. The idea that any group needed to stage a controlled demolition in order to heighten the drama is ridiculous.
 
Not to mention that it has been proven in court that the bbc announced
The collapse of one of the towers more than 20 minutes before it actually fell.
it was also reported that other planes were hijacked and that othe buildings were bombed but those didnt happen either. i saw those reports live when it happened.
It was definitely not done by the bearded man in the cave and his merry men like we were lead to believe. It was done by people in very high places (probably Mosad) for two reasons: 1. To get the public approval to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan because they had WMDs. Which really meant they arrived in Araq and immediately took over all the oil fields a pumped billions of barrels of oil out of the country. In Afghanistan it was all about the opium trade and the lithium vanes worth trillions of dollars. How do I know all of this? YouTube baby!

lmao, you didn't need 9/11 to get americans to support a war against Iraq. you don't need much of an excuse to get americans to support going to war. fucking George hw did it ten years before. that's a stupid theory.
 
People that think buildings can fall like this without being strategically and intentionally leveled are Fucking retarded.

This.

Also, as 1 of the most influent italian magistrate said, before being killed by mafia, "Follow the moneys".

Who made moneys from 9/11?

Bin Laden? NOPE
Al Quedda? N O P E
Saddam Hussain? N-O-P-E

Check online who did and you ll find your answer..
 
Thanks for the thread. I needed a reminder of how absolutely stupid some human beings are.

don't know what side you're on. Probably the mainstream media side. But it's a fact that people who make statements like you just made, do so out of low intellect. They can't think at the level others can, so they dismiss it as foolish. It's a form of projecting, but that's probably over your head as well.
 
America can't fake WMD's in Iraq, but somehow our Govt can pull this off? LMAO.
 
WTC 7 is weird. That has always made me wonder a bit about 9/11, but then you realize how many people would have had to be in on it, and how three buildings could be perfectly wire for controlled demolition without anyone knowing, and it's very implausible that a conspiracy could have happened. But it's understandable that someone could see some info on building 7 and start to question the official narrative. I give Rowdy a pass.

"Without anyone knowing?" You clearly haven't watched any documentaries on the subject. Over 30 previous tennents reported that weeks prior to 9/11 all the bomb sniffer dogs were removed from the buildings, they had power outages, elevator renovation which involved hundreds of meters of cable and full floor evacuations whilst they did the "refurbishment work", plus floors that were known to be empty (elevators didn't even stop on those floors) with heavy objects moving around days prior. I recommend you watch the documentary where thousands of top level scientists and structural engineers including demolition specialists have all come forward saying free fall of those three buildings was impossible and they demonstrate why.
 
Back
Top