I'm glad we all agree on how they were brought down.
provide some of those links that debunk my debunk links, im interested
Im assuming youre talking about the Pentagon one, where there was no video of a plane, nor any noticable plane debris in the live newscast shot where it happened?
If not, forget what i said. I admit that ive stopped "looking into" this subject awhile ago.
"Inside Job" is a broad term imo, when discussing 9/11. But i think its clear that after the initial shock, sensible people think its shady. I also think that its normal to try and dissect it, and "unravel" the mystery, but its all based on the individuals circumstantial evidence to begin with.
We'll, (the general public), almost certainly never know the truth behind 9/11.
There are mounds of nonsense, which have been packaged and repackaged over the years but still do not stand up to scrutiny.
Truthers have been doing their best to trick demolitions experts into confirming their claims but anyone who knows demolition knows this wasn't it.
He still owns the towers and paid to rebuild them, overall he lost money. But please, make more infographics
The plane slammed into the Pentagon travelling hundreds of miles an hour and most of it disintegrated, which is what you'd expect when something so fragile slams into a reinforced structure. They did pull the engines out of the building, because those were huge and made of metal.
how do a few little fires supposedly started by falling debris((lol)) bring down 52 story skyscraper?
I mean it can be argued that the fires in the two towers fuelled by the jet fuel could POSSIBLY weaken the structure enough to cause a collapse ....((building still wouldnt collapse the way it did and it doesnt explain the pools of molten metal which the fire from the jetplane fuel could NEVER produce
Building 7 wasnt even hit by a plane never had jetfuel fuelled fires burning in it or anything of the sort...it most definately was not hit by any significant amount of debris that would crush its foundation or structure
there is evidence((Audio)) and interview recorded from Larry where he is talking about how they decided it was best to "pull it" lol
and there is also public admittance from John Kerry that WTC 7 was indeed a controlled demolition lol
coincidence is something that only happens once...more than that and it becomes very suspicious, when you talk about a whole multitude of coincidental occurances happening all around the same event.....your alarm bells should be ringing, your spidey sense should be going off and your level of skepticism should be on the rise
So, all available footage of the buildings' collapse have been doctored? A simple side-by-side comparison would seem sufficient to debunk this myth, if it were one.
I find this a bit hard to swallow.
damn the whole Bush being hired as a dumbass fall guy theory rings true with so many of you "oh our government isn't smart enough to do that!" types. trust me, your government is smart, they have geniuses in all fields from war to medicine to the space race, it's just your front man was a bit of a moron for 8 years. nothing more.
Because when you watch and read enough nothing makes sense but a controlled demolition.
The idiots are out in full force tonight, eh?
Why is this thread still in the heavies?
9/11 wasn't an inside job. That's retarded. Anybody that can think critically and look at facts objectively without confirmation bias will come to this conclusion.
Beat it, nerds.
It's not exactly a theory that isn't at least semi-popular. There are thousands, maybe even millions of people who feel that 9/11 was an inside job. These same people believe in chemtrails, the illuminati, a forthcoming police state in the US, and the new world order.
I always thought that planes didn't hit the pentagon or the wtc were just jokes. I didn't know there were actually people who believe that!