• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Law President Free Speech Musk thinks entire news agency should be imprisoned

HOLA

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Messages
23,683
Reaction score
42,981


Elon Musk is pushing for a massive crackdown on free speech, by taking up the rusty rapier that is Donald Trump’s pitiable crusade against CBS’s 60 Minutes.

The president has been fuming about Kamala Harris’s interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes since it first aired in September, and claimed that the show had “defrauded the public” by airing different portions of Harris’s answer to a question about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on different days. A transcript of the original interview released by the Federal Communications Commission earlier this month found that both answers were part of the same extended response.

“60 Minutes are the biggest liars in the world!” Musk wrote in a post on X Sunday. “They engaged in deliberate deception to interfere with the last election. They deserve a long prison sentence.”

Musk’s fascist threat to imprison journalists was a deflection written in response to a post from 60 Minutes that criticized his efforts to gut USAID.

“President Trump says USAID is rife with fraud. But Andrew Natsios, a Republican former administrator of USAID, calls that ‘utter nonsense.’ Natsios says USAID is ‘the most accountable aid agency in the world,’” read the post from 60 Minutes.

Musk’s outrageous threat feels all the more prescient after the Trump administration last week moved to indefinitely ban the Associated Press from the White House and Air Force One, over its refusal to use the fake name Trump came up with for the Gulf of Mexico.
 
The lawsuit by Trump against CBS over the Kamala interview is an insane threat to free speech but unfortunately it's not setting off the alarm bells the way it should and so the frog gets one degree closer to the boiling point.
 
The lawsuit by Trump against CBS over the Kamala interview is an insane threat to free speech but unfortunately it's not setting off the alarm bells the way it should and so the frog gets one degree closer to the boiling point.
imprisonment? Nah.

What 60 Minutes did was egregious though. It’s their right to do such things and it’s the consumers right to ignore them — which they did.
 
For maybe election interference in 2020?
Election interference? In what way?
imprisonment? Nah.

What 60 Minutes did was egregious though. It’s their right to do such things and it’s the consumers right to ignore them — which they did.
How was it egregious? And don't you think the threat to free speech that Trump's lawsuit represents is the bigger issue here?
 
Election interference? In what way?

How was it egregious? And don't you think the threat to free speech that Trump's lawsuit represents is the bigger issue here?
Did see nothing at all wrong with what they did? If you see zero wrong, there is no point in explaining why my position is that it was egregious. I think Trump sues everyone and everything. I don’t think free speech is under threat with his lawsuit.
 
Did see nothing at all wrong with what they did? If you see zero wrong, there is no point in explaining why my position is that it was egregious.
What did they do that was wrong?
I think Trump sues everyone and everything. I don’t think free speech is under threat with his lawsuit.
You don't see how a POTUS suing media orgs that publish things he doesn't like is a threat to free speech? Especially when that POTUS is in position to approve or deny mergers involving said media orgs?
 
What did they do that was wrong?
Edit an interview with the potential President of the United States, to make her seem like less of a blithering idiot than she is.

It's called propaganda. That is the thing they did wrong. Might be technically legal, but it is wrong. Tell me what you would say if FOX News had edited a Trump interview to make him look better. Something tells me that you wouldn't be saying "What did they do wrong?"

By all means keep dying on these hills, LOL.
 
An interview Trump did with Fox News or Cucker was edited which makes his answer to a question sound better, I don't remember what interview it is though. It's a question about the Epstein stuff, it's edited so that it looks like he quickly says yes to declassifying it but he actually meandered.

Oh well, people will defend this bullshit anyway, TFG
 
Back
Top