Sean S said:Seriously, if you are going to write that much everytime some internet mouse starts roaring, you are going to have some tired hands. I don't think you have to worry about character assassination here. Your lifting numbers and generally useful information protect you from that. You've just stumbled upon someone who just wants to be heard/wants attention.
Cmart said:I endorse Entropy full-heartedly - he's got a great body of knowledge on strength, and likes to help out. I can't think of anyone I'd rather turn to for info that Entropy. I might come back and post once a few things get straightened out, but you guys are in very capable hands anyways with Entropy here.
PariahCarey said:I apologized in the 5'9 thread for flame wars. I don't like you Entropy, I didn't bother reading your entrire above post cause i gto better things to d, but to say you don't attack other people is ridiculous, you come off as sociopathic...sometimes one can get sucked into these things on the internet and lose track of why they came on hre in the first place...I got better things to do...like i said in that post that i'm going to try and remain positve and lets get back on point in this forum... i did think calling you demEntrophy was pretty fun but anyway...so...
...SORRY FOR THE ATTACK ENTROPY, i should've handled it better...
yomon said:what the hell.
seriously this is just foolishness.
Wrecking Ball said:Madmick, James Smith's beef with any type of OHP was while a contact athlete was in season. Football, hockey, wrestling, and to some degree MMA. He felt that the shoulders would be more prone to injury, especially with heavy OHP.
Madmick said:Actually, the point I'm most interested in discussing is in regards to matters where you, Entropy, and James Smith disagree? Is it on overhead lifts? Cocky wrote that James doesn't believe in the C&J for athletes because of the repetitive stress to the shoulder the dynamic overhead lifts cause. What's your take on this?