Definitely don't think Whittaker is better everywhere. Whittaker has cleaner more technical striking imo, but DDP despite his awkward style has more power and better submissions. Whittaker doesn't really go for submissions.
Not sure how their wrestling compares but Dricus is definitely more dangerous on the ground, if the fight gets there.
i dont think so. sherdog poll for that fight was as lopsided as for any fight. whitaker was better everywhere. sometimes fighters have a lot of submissions in the regional scene before ufc. it skews up the number a bit. before fighting whittaker, the only sub ddp had was against beyond washed up darren till. and bjj isn't always about submissions either.
i just think this is a hindsight talking. now we can point to things and say ddp is better, but before the fight, it looked like rob was better everywhere. and i dont think that was wrong by any means to say that pre-fight.
i was saying before the fight, rob is a more polished version, but because ddp is big and young and comes to fight, wouldn't count him out necessarily.
and that's really what happened, he got manhandled.
but on paper, technically, it looked like he was outgunned everywhere.
and he won.
ddp is a funny case. i think it was because he lost to soldic, he didn't have a whole lot of hype. but the man kept on winning. class act too. can you imagine how much shit talk there woulda been if Izzy won? yikes.
respect to the man.