But some do. You're so determined to dislike the superior, more versatile engineering design that you're projecting your own subjective habits onto the assessment.
You're also ignoring what I've pointed out about the degradation of the battery life over time. This is why many opt to buy new controllers after only a few years.
Not only is degradation unavoidable, but any failure at multiple points in the system requires a new $60 controller. Sometimes batteries fail, sometimes ports fail. None of the value is carried over, either. Sometimes a joystick gets stuck. So you buy a new controller. With the Xbox design, all of your battery doors and charging stands interface with the new controller. You may also find used controllers on the cheap because they come without any battery door, but otherwise work perfectly fine.
The assembly line model rose to dominance because it is superior.
I’m not ignoring anything, do you even realise I never even mentioned anything about longevity or versatility, never mentioned Sony or anyone else.
MS need to include a rechargeable solution with the controller if they want to go this route.
As it is you cannot buy an Xbox for the first time and game for years to come without spending extra on some sort of batteries.
And no everybody doesn’t have several battery packs or loads of rechargeable batteries on stand by.
That was my original post, you just went on a massive deflection rant.