Official UFC 173 Betting Thread - Post Your Bets!

Status
Not open for further replies.
NBA WEDNESDAY

im liking brooklyn at +7 tonight. they are down 3-1 and as in desperation mode while miami might take it a bit easy since they have a commanding hold of the series. i wouldnt be surprised if the nets come out flat but i think aging stars like pierce and garnett dont go out without a fight. conversely, i dont like the trailblazers tonight in a game similar to the heat-nets because of the big difference in bench play and due to how much the spurs value added rest time. i think the spurs get the job done tonight. actually going to parlay the two plays together

Brooklyn +7 + SA ML @+139 for 1u

good luck, everyone

NBA RESULTS and PREDICTION

today's parlay cashed pretty easily. looking forward to tomorrow, i like the clippers but i have a feeling theyre going to come out flat and potentially shoot themselves in the foot. chris paul looked emotionally drained during the post game press conference after game 5 but he is the type of player to make a strong impact in game 6 because of what happened in game 5. in reality, i cant see how this game doesnt go back to OKC for game 7.

regarding the pacers/wizards, i lean pacers but i wont touch that line at all
 
NBA RESULTS and PREDICTION

today's parlay cashed pretty easily. looking forward to tomorrow, i like the clippers but i have a feeling theyre going to come out flat and potentially shoot themselves in the foot. chris paul looked emotionally drained during the post game press conference after game 5 but he is the type of player to make a strong impact in game 6 because of what happened in game 5. in reality, i cant see how this game doesnt go back to OKC for game 7.

regarding the pacers/wizards, i lean pacers but i wont touch that line at all

I wish I had hopped on the Brooklyn line when I saw your lean but the game already started.

I hit Blazers under 99.5 for 1u very easily.

Also parlayed blazers under 100.5 with clippers win series. $3 to win $21 and some change.

I really hope the clips make it far
 
I wish I had hopped on the Brooklyn line when I saw your lean but the game already started.

I hit Blazers under 99.5 for 1u very easily.

Also parlayed blazers under 100.5 with clippers win series. $3 to win $21 and some change.

I really hope the clips make it far

same here, i really want the clippers to win since i cant stand westbrook and ibaka. and im from LA so that adds to my bias. do you remember what the odds are that the clippers win the series?
 
same here, i really want the clippers to win since i cant stand westbrook and ibaka. and im from LA so that adds to my bias. do you remember what the odds are that the clippers win the series?

Got it at +325 on 5dimes
 
Not getting this love for Tito at all either as a pick or because of value.

So if your betting Tito @ +385 you think that Tito would win this fight more than 2 times out of 10. I think your being a bit generous here guys.

Tito is old , injured and hasn't been active in a couple of years we have no idea about his motivation at the moment. I would hazard a guess that the fighter 10 years younger holding the title is much more motivated .

Those who say "Well who has Shlemenko Beat? you are right his resume does lack a lot of wins over "Name" guys which is why I think Shlmenko called him out in the first place. Even though a win over a 2014 Tito Ortiz isn't that great it is still a mma legends name on your resume.

Ya I would have to agree with that, I think Tito gets smoked here. Size is good to have and all but the skill difference here will make up for any size advantage Tito has. Schlemenko is a very skilled striker he will find Tito's chin and body several times with kicks and punches, this guy just knows how to win fights. Even though his comp may not be the greatest when you're winning fights your confidence soars, and Schlemenko has been winning fights whereas Tito has barely been fighting and even when he has he often loses.

Guys, you're acting like people putting a money on Tito are doing so at E money. FFS, he's a +400 dog, it's essentially a flier. Moreover, he's not fighting Mo, Page, Newton, or even M'Pumbu; he's fighting what ostensibly is a blown up WW. Personally, I think the money is on the o1.5 @ -145 which I have $300 on, but I'm putting a flier on Tito and can't blame anyone else who does.

After last weekends UFC I'd think you guys would be a bit more less definitive about "locks" out there. +700 Johnny Eduardo says there's no such thing as a lock. And he beat the #2 BW contender. After a 2v year hiatus.
 
i also hit that tito-shlemenko O1.5 line pretty hard.. but i did twice as much on shamwow-guerreiro O1.5. i can't believe it's still sitting around -145. i think it goes O1.5 at least 75% of the time
 
I put Tito in a parlay but I've already accepted that the money I laid down is going into another persons bank account for good.

I hope Tito is lays on him for 15 minutes and weighs Schlemenko down with his enormous head.

I know he's made a lot of money but he's addicted to very high maintenance broads, if he's desperate for money he'll shamelessly lay, smother and avoid fighting just to get the win.

He's done it many times before, he was one of the worst of fighters to do that crap. Seems a lot of people forget how bad he would lay and pray because everyone focuses on his ridiculous persona.
 
Medium parlay on Richman + Drago + Kongo + Page

Probably will go small singles on Mo and Tito. There's a chance Tito just pounds out a very smaller opponent.
 
Guys, you're acting like people putting a money on Tito are doing so at E money. FFS, he's a +400 dog, it's essentially a flier. Moreover, he's not fighting Mo, Page, Newton, or even M'Pumbu; he's fighting what ostensibly is a blown up WW. Personally, I think the money is on the o1.5 @ -145 which I have $300 on, but I'm putting a flier on Tito and can't blame anyone else who does.

After last weekends UFC I'd think you guys would be a bit more less definitive about "locks" out there. +700 Johnny Eduardo says there's no such thing as a lock. And he beat the #2 BW contender. After a 2v year hiatus.

Hey I love playing dogs as much as the next guy, took Magny and Cruickshank last card. Difference here is that Tito unlike those other 2 underdogs is over the hill and washed up whereas those guys were dogs because they haven't done much but were improving. The Eduardo fight was different because the man actually displayed some nice skills, fast explosive accurate striker. When I watch Tito's last few fights he looks slow, plodding footwork and bad cardio, he just looks off imo.

Schlemenko impresses me. Tito hasn't won a fight in such a long time he probably doesn't remember what it feels like. Schlemenko just keeps winning fights, winning and losing can become like a habit sometimes for fighters, Schlemenkos confidence in his striking is very high right now, he mixes it up well and looks for openings and he's versatile with his boxing, kicks and body shots.

One thing that I am a bit concerned about is that he will be going up to 205 for this fight. I do plan on hedging with Tito dec but I expect the fight to play out with Schlemenko winning via domination, I'm not sure if he will finish Tito but it would not surprise me in the least. At the current odds I can't really blame anybody for putting a flier down on Tito but laying big units on him is a waste imo, Schlemenko is on another level right now compared to Tito, just my 2 cents.
 
Adam Martin - http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/...wn-alexander-shlemenko-460-vs-tito-ortiz-320/

This is a really weird fight that I could see playing out a lot of ways. I think Ortiz might be able to land a takedown or two in the first round but I do think he’ll tire as the fight goes on and I expect Shlemenko to rip into him with body shots and force a stoppage sometime in the second or third round.

This is a total pass fight if I’ve ever seen one and there’s no way I would suggest playing Shlemenko at -460. As for Ortiz, if he reaches +500 he could be worth a small flier just for sheer value, but until then this fight is a total pass for me as far as any sort of bet goes. The only thing that is of mild interest is a prop on Shlemenko inside the distance — if that’s at plus money, it could be worth playing.

Adam Martin - http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/...down-michael-chandler-900-vs-will-brooks-500/

I think Chandler is going to stuff Brooks’ takedown attempts and keep this fight on the feet, where he is a little bit faster with his strikes, and I think Chandler is going to earn the knockout to take home the interim title.

Chandler should win this fight but there isn’t much value in the current line of -900. Still, I believe it’s a favorite or pass situation. The total might be the better bet in this fight, with UNDER 2.5 rounds being available at -145. I do think there should be an early knockout in this one so that’s probably the best bet to make from what’s been offered so far by the books. Keep an eye out for the Chandler wins inside the distance prop as well.
 
Brad Taschuk - http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/bellator-120-main-card-opening-betting-odds/

Bellator received a lot of criticism when it booked Will Brooks vs. Nate Jolly on this PPV card, saying that the fight was pointless, but that was essentially the fight that saved this card. Will Brooks also has a bit of an advantage heading into this bout with Chandler in that he has probably had an eye on both Chandler and Alvarez, while they have been focusing on each other. Still, Chandler should be the superior wrestler here, and his overall MMA game has developed far beyond what Brooks has shown thus far. Unless the former champion suffers a big letdown after the change in opponents, I expect him to put Brooks away with strikes within the first two rounds, and for the line to get bet up accordingly.

This fight is just weird. Bjorn Rebney has made the case that it’s intriguing because you don’t know if Tito is going to come out and be able to bully Shlemenko for three rounds. Well, I disagree. I know Tito won’t be able to bully Shlemenko for three rounds because he hasn’t been able to fight hard for three rounds in about a decade. Even if Tito finds some early success, eventually he will slow down and Shlemenko will start ripping punches and kicks to the body, which will likely stop the fight. If offered, Shlemenko inside the distance is the play here, as I wouldn’t be shocked to see Tito tap to strikes rather than just waiting for the ref to step in, and it would be terrible to lose on a (T)KO prop because of that. I would be shocked if there was much money at all coming in on Tito in this fight, despite his massive size advantage.

I do think that despite not having faced the same quality of competition as his opponent, Michael Page will defeat Ricky Rainey. Page is taller, longer and a bit more versatile with his striking, and this fight is almost certainly going to take place on the feet. If it hits the ground, neither guy is a particularly big threat, but Page has flashed a bit more of a submission game in his short career, so I give him that edge although I suspect Rainey would be the one attempting to take things to the mat (and likely ending up on top). Even though I lean towards Page, I think the hype on him is a bit silly, and this line will probably become unplayable with parlay action coming in on him.

The heavyweight final is actually a half-decent fight as far as heavyweights go, and seems competitive on paper. I haven’t been particularly high on either of these fighters up to this point, but Volkov has definitely impressed me more in this tournament (which is strange, since he fought Mark Holata and Mighty Mo to get to the final). I think that Volkov has made improvements in his takedown defense, and his striking is way ahead of Ivanov’s. Likewise, Ivanov has an advantage on the ground, but I’m not sure if his wrestling is good enough to get it down and keep it there, or if his cardio can hold up for three rounds against someone offering more of a threat than Rich Hale. I do lean Volkov, but as long as this fight stays close to a pick em, I’m passing it. If Ivanov gets enough love from the public, I may come in on Volkov if he hits the +140 range however.

Brad Taschuk - http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/bellator-120-full-card-opening-betting-odds/

A pair of mismatches (perhaps the organization is hoping for some early finishes and more time to hype the PPV), and a pair of competitive bouts on this prelim card.

In all honesty, if people weren’t so worries about Cheick Kongo’s chin giving out, this line would probably be closer to 7 or 8-to-1. He’s going to be massive in comparison to Smith, and will have both striking and wrestling advantages. I’m imagining that if there is a stoppage in this fight, it comes from Kongo kneeing Smith against the cage, or taking him down and using his ground-and-pound up against the cage. Either way, I expect Kongo to control the bout against a man who has only competed once in the past four years.

With most fighters, I’d be a bit concerned about the late notice Marcin Held is coming in on, but two factors don’t have me concerned in the slightest. First, he doesn’t cut much weight, so his cardio shouldn’t be impacted negatively. Second, he’s the type of fighter who makes his opponents adapt to him with his unique style of grappling. If anything, this is even worse for Nate Jolly than the Will Brooks fight. Although outmatched there, he was facing a fairly traditional fighter. Now he gets a fighter you really need some time to prepare for. He doesn’t have it, and he doesn’t have much of a shot here.

It’s been over a year since we last saw Shahbulat Shamhalaev (isn’t that fun to spell?) in the cage. He has been missed, because he is typically pretty fun to watch. Although at a height and reach disadvantage against most fighters in his division, he has very good timing, and I think he’ll put that to use against Fabricio Guerreiro while this fight is on the feet. The problem for Shamhalaev however is that if the fight doesn’t stay on the feet, Guerreiro will be at a big advantage. The Brazilian has looked markedly better since getting stopped by Frodo Khasbulaev, and especially impressed with his grappling against Des Green, which is something I think he can replicate here. It’s closer than the line indicates, and for that reason I lean towards the dog if I’m making a bet here.

I’m a bit less confident in Richman/Yamauchi. Both guys have a tendency to underpeform, but I have to side with Richman here. Yamauchi simply isn’t the prospect he was hyped up to be — if he was, they would be giving him a far easier fight than this. Richman is very hittable and can also be overly tentative at times, but that mainly comes against opponents who present a big KO of takedown threat, neither of which Yamauchi has shown much of in his career.
 
Love the o1.5 Tito/Alex @ -200 or above

Ito has only been stopped inside of r1 once since '97 when Mezger got him and then by Lil Nog most recently. He has only been stopped inside 1.5 x3 whuch is by the aforementioned fighters & Rashad. I think it goes all 3 rnds.

I put $200 on Mo @ + 215 as well

Wonder if will have lb for this event?

shit i completely forgot this was 3 rounds, definitely going to hedge a bit on tito now.
Thinking about it wasn't tito a similar price when he was scheduled to fight rampage?

In Australia unless you are at a tab you must phone up to live bet. It's the stupidest sh*t ever and costs me money cause I don't hedge or miss out on the good odds.

So tempted to sign up to bookmaker.


I'm still amazed people bet on the tab's the odds are such bad value compared to what you could get online. I'd definitely try and sign up if i were you. have you tried getting a vpn or something? you can bet in play for aussie events though right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top