I'm not saying that this fight was a robbery, but "this decision wasn't nearly as bad as some of the other bad decisions" is a terrible argument.
A voice of reason in a sea of butthurt fans.Most people had a number of close rounds that could have gone either way on their cards...so I wouldn't even call it a "bad decision". It was a close fight, I had Lola winning, but 2-3 of those rounds could have gone to Haney based on what someone was looking for. It was decision that didn't go Loma's way but that happens in close fights.
Been following way longer than 18 years....I've been following the sport for 18 years. Longer than I've followed MMA. I'm perfectly aware of how scoring works. Get tf over yourself.
The point just keeps going right over your head. If you have 6 highly competitive, toss-up, even rounds, then you would expect those rounds to be split. Even if its not an even 3-3 split, they would still be split. But if you have 6 razor thin, even rounds, and you give them ALL to one guy, there is obvious bias/corruption/external factors at play.
Different judges score different things. Some judges like the guy that landed the biggest punch, some judges like the guy who controlled the round. Its perfectly reasonable for a judge to give all close rounds to one guy if he appreciates his work more. Its rare but I've seen split decisions with wide scores that both seemed reasonable.I've been following the sport for 18 years. Longer than I've followed MMA. I'm perfectly aware of how scoring works. Get tf over yourself.
The point just keeps going right over your head. If you have 6 highly competitive, toss-up, even rounds, then you would expect those rounds to be split. Even if its not an even 3-3 split, they would still be split. But if you have 6 razor thin, even rounds, and you give them ALL to one guy, there is obvious bias/corruption/external factors at play.
you can’t “expect” anything. those rounds were close by your estimation, via your personal scoring criteria. judges are also not all created equal. i thought it was quite obvious that haney scored more with big power punches to the body, and what do you know? the judges agreed.I've been following the sport for 18 years. Longer than I've followed MMA. I'm perfectly aware of how scoring works. Get tf over yourself.
The point just keeps going right over your head. If you have 6 highly competitive, toss-up, even rounds, then you would expect those rounds to be split. Even if its not an even 3-3 split, they would still be split. But if you have 6 razor thin, even rounds, and you give them ALL to one guy, there is obvious bias/corruption/external factors at play.
Yea I think it was odd that he kinda tried to shoot the narrative that way. It's always been the style of boxers that most fans I know judge by. I'm sure there is some racism in it but I don't think i see that type of disdain towards Ennis or Spence like I do with Haney or even Mayweather.Loma fans have said I hate him because of his race for years, even though I'm white.
Sorry bro feel like a dickhead for posting it cause it's a bad moment
![]()
Out of curiosity, what do you think the angle would be for robbing Loma to give Haney an undeserved win? Loma is the guy with a story. Loma is the guy with the fanbase.I thought Loma won, but it's boxing, so I am long long past thinking I'll get an honest decision. I just try to enjoy the fights to see the talent and if it's a KO / TKO taking the judges out of it, I'm far more satisfied. Going to the judges in boxing just means you're rolling the dice. Nice fight by both men.
"Scored more" really? Because Loma officially landed more punches. So wtf are you talking about?you can’t “expect” anything. those rounds were close by your estimation, via your personal scoring criteria. judges are also not all created equal. i thought it was quite obvious that haney scored more with big power punches to the body, and what do you know? the judges agreed.
guy who’s been “following the sport for 18 years” thinks all punches are counted 1-by-1 and equally. you’re right there’s no difference between a love tap on the lips and a wound-up haymaker to the belly. they are scored equally. right."Scored more" really? Because Loma officially landed more punches. So wtf are you talking about?
This is just a really strange line of reasoning that you're pushing when the only fighter that was hurt or wobbled in this fight was Haney, and it happened multiple times. Did you pass out the last 4 rounds? Why would you be pushing the power punches narrative when Haney got wobbled and put on skates multiple times and Loma was never hurt? Very weird.guy who’s been “following the sport for 18 years” thinks all punches are counted 1-by-1 and equally. you’re right there’s no difference between a love tap on the lips and a wound-up haymaker to the belly. they are scored equally. right.
guy who’s been “following the sport for 18 years” thinks all punches are counted 1-by-1 and equally. you’re right there’s no difference between a love tap on the lips and a wound-up haymaker to the belly. they are scored equally. right.
You know what I almost forgot about was the dirty fighter angle. All week Loma fans were so upset about that then he comes out and immediately starts fouling in the first round.