Law Notorious RBG

JonesBones said:
napoleon_bonaparte_1.jpg
Click to expand...

Alex.jpg
 
Life appointments enacted in a time when people were lucky to live to age 50.

She's been unfit mentally and physically for a decade. But she's too petty and partisan to retire and no in the media is honest enough to say this.
 
Fucking ghey pride parades! But they shouldn't be allowed to marry, adopt or have a family. You god damn baby killers! Gut all social welfare programs and icky gheys still can't adopt either. Homosexuality is immoral! Islam is homophobic. Throwing people off rooftops is the standard we measure ourselves by in a modern, civilized society.

Hey. Shut the fuck up about pride parades, social welfare programs and Muslims. You got no legs.
 
NoDak said:
The party's platform is anti-marriage and adoption equality, that's by definition anti-family. It's kind of ironic to bitch and moan about extrovert dykes, flamboyant :eek::eek::eek:s and trannies staging debauch parades but then stand in opposition to equal rights as citizens for those who just want to live 'normal' lives.



My stance on that is mostly on account of shitty parents and the overtly negative effect that wields throughout society on the whole in myriad ways. I wouldn't ever consider having my own child aborted (I became a father at 19), and I imagine the majority of would be parents who entertain the thought probably aren't fit to be one. Not to mention a lot of these kids would also be dependent on social welfare programs you don't support. Think, dumbass.



Um, virtually everyday on this subforum? The fact that these states actually take votes on repealing their unenforceable laws dictating what consenting adults are allowed to do in their own homes and yet choose to keep them on their books says everything one needs to know about the message being sent. You can't be prosecuted, you can be harassed and arrested. It's third world level shit.

https://www.usatoday.com/amp/7981025

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — A dozen states still have anti-sodomy laws on the books 10 15+ years after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled they are unconstitutional.

One such state is Louisiana, where gay rights groups contend police have used anti-sodomy laws to target gay men. But state lawmakers sided with religious and conservative groups in refusing to repeal the law last week.

The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 that it is unconstitutional to bar consensual sex between adults, calling it a violation of the 14th Amendment. Houston police arrested two men for engaging in a sexual act in petitioner Lawrence’s own home. The court ruled that consenting adults have the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention from the government.

Last year, police in East Baton Rouge Parish arrested men for attempted crimes against nature using the anti-sodomy law in a sting operation that caused a national outcry. The district attorney wouldn't bring charges against the arrested men, saying the law was unenforceable.

This led Rep. Patricia Smith, D-Baton Rouge, to file the bill that would repeal Louisiana's anti-sodomy law, saying it would make the system fairer and more efficient.

"We don't need inefficient laws on the books," she said.

Her fellow representatives, however, disagreed and voted 66-27 on April 15 to keep the law in place.
Click to expand...
Why is that ironic? They can live together and be monogamous if they'd like but the state has no business in their relationship like they do with couples who could and probably will get pregnant. With divorce as common as it is and so many couples combining income for tax purposes, there really isn't much reason for state involvement in straight marriage either anymore. BTW, almost every democrat, including Obama and Hillary, opposed gay marriage until they thought they could get more votes flipping on it just a few years ago.

Again, it's unenforceable and being grossed out by dudes cramming things up each other's dirty arses is not a call for prosecution, it's a request to not try to make it my business. It's goddamn gross with fat people and senior citizens and furry fetishes too. I don't want them imprisoned but would prefer they not expect me to celebrate their sex lives.
 
Last edited:
nostradumbass said:
Why is that ironic? They can live together and be monogamous if they'd like but the state has no business in their relationship like they do with couples who could and probably will get pregnant. With divorce as common as it is and so many couples combining income for tax purposes, there really isn't much reason for state involvement in straight marriage either anymore. BTW, almost every democrat, including Obama and Hillary, opposed gay marriage until they thought they could get more votes flipping on it just a few years ago.

Again, it's unenforceable and being grossed out by dudes cramming things up each other's dirty arses is not a call for prosecution, it's a request to not try to make it my business. It's goddamn gross with fat people and senior citizens and furry fetishes too. I don't want them imprisoned but would prefer they not expect me to celebrate their sex lives.
Click to expand...

There's plenty to say about people's business, politicization, enforcement ("again"?) which is very much a two-way street but we aren't going to get anywhere with that and the second paragraph is just ugh, nah. Do you see the rationale on abortion though, even if you disagree? A woman's 'reproductive rights' aren't actually the primary reason I'm (reluctantly) pro-choice. It's also pretty damn grim when you get to 2nd/3rd.
 
NoDak said:
There's plenty to say about people's business, politicization, enforcement ("again"?) which is very much a two-way street but we aren't going to get anywhere with that and the second paragraph is just ugh, nah. Do you see the rationale on abortion though, even if you disagree? A woman's 'reproductive rights' aren't actually the primary reason I'm (reluctantly) pro-choice. It's also pretty damn grim when you get to 2nd/3rd.
Click to expand...
I see the rationale, but nothing about that argument wouldn't also apply to the state deciding who's an unfit parent and making the decision, and I'm assuming you're not in favor of that. If we're just doing it pragmatically, might as well abort the parents as well.
 
I wish her good health, but she needs to retire. It's been overdue for 10 years. I also think Supreme Court appointments should be for 20 years instead of life.
 
Seaside said:
God will judge all for supporting immorality. This woman has done a lot of that in the name of "liberalism". All the things the Bible says NOT to do she embraces and wants legalized.
Click to expand...

The laws of a country (and politicians, judges etc) shouldn´t really take a book written for retards into consideration when doing their jobs. Seperation of church and state and all. They shouldn´t use Harry Potter either
 
Limbo Pete said:
Scalia is what happens when someone smart is also really really mean
Click to expand...

And not all that smart lol.

Scalia really lacked in the area of self-awareness and emotional intelligence. His talent as a jurist was/is really overstated due to just how monumentally terrible the other members of the conservative court were during his tenure: Thomas and Alito will certainly go down as two of the worst of all-time. And I think Kennedy's legacy is going to steeply decline as well.
 
Trotsky said:
And not all that smart lol.

Scalia really lacked in the area of self-awareness and emotional intelligence. His talent as a jurist was/is really overstated due to just how monumentally terrible the other members of the conservative court were during his tenure: Thomas and Alito will certainly go down as two of the worst of all-time. And I think Kennedy's legacy is going to steeply decline as well.
Click to expand...
I suppose I was being pretty generous
 
Limbo Pete said:
I suppose I was being pretty generous
Click to expand...

Well, that's just your nature, Petrov.

Obviously, tho, Scalia is brilliant relative to the average Joe. And he's one of the best writers in the history of the conservative court. But his lows, particularly when he had to reason backwards from one of his reactionary and/or partisan positions, were looooooow.
 
KeepItRealist said:
Life appointments enacted in a time when people were lucky to live to age 50.

She's been unfit mentally and physically for a decade. But she's too petty and partisan to retire and no in the media is honest enough to say this.
Click to expand...

Can you point to any opinions or analyses that reflect that she's mentally unfit? Physically, she's no worse than a lot of previous jurists. I think it was Burger who had to have his clerks describe what was happening in pornographies before the Court because his eyesight was so bad.
 
NoDak said:
Which is what? And is it ok or not ok? I don't know what you mean about mandated but in any case, sexual orientation is not a protected class in this country at the federal level though religion is. I see LGB youth (which obviously includes children) that grow up in homophobic households contemplating suicide at over 8x the rate of those who don't.

There isn't much we can do about POS parents who lack morals and humanity, but the least that could be done is demonstrate in some way that they're accepted and there's a place for them in our society? I see people on here every day claiming it's an erosion of it, but guess what? "LGB People" had an enormous, overrepresented role in building this motherfucking civilization. It's honestly surreal you guys can claim you aren't homophobic with a straight face (no pun).

So like, one lesson plan out of an entire school year - and this is in Britain - with innocuous picture books of cartoon drawings with people smiling and holding hands is "indoctrination" to you dudes and you back the Muslims on it yet it's the left in bed with them? And they ARE spastics for that shit. No, religion is indoctrination, someone's sexual orientation is immutable. This is a secular liberal democracy, not a theocracy.
Click to expand...

That wall of text doesnt change the fact that the left starts this "normalization" in elementary school.

And FTR, no one is calling for executions or jailing gays In the US
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,937
Messages
58,329,406
Members
176,000
Latest member
Markooz86

Share this page

Back
Top