- Joined
- Apr 27, 2006
- Messages
- 31,754
- Reaction score
- 12,455
For those calling for a ban of assault weapons? Why do they think he would have killed less if he had been using a Glock or any other semi-auto handgun?
An AR-15 long-rifle, like he used, is a horrible weapon choice for close quarters combat of unarmored targets in an indoor space. Targets can see you coming a mile away, and you're far easier to disarm than if you're using a shorter weapon like a handgun.
I would estimate that had this shooter, a trained firearms instructor, had used a handgun he would have been able to take down a lot more targets before they realized what is going on and scattered.
The reason the government focuses on assault rifles is two fold:
1) Semi-auto rifles are designed to defeat body-armor, which the public doesn't wear, but the government enforces do.
2) They know it won't make any difference in homicide rates, which will allow them to move on to banning all guns.
An AR-15 long-rifle, like he used, is a horrible weapon choice for close quarters combat of unarmored targets in an indoor space. Targets can see you coming a mile away, and you're far easier to disarm than if you're using a shorter weapon like a handgun.
I would estimate that had this shooter, a trained firearms instructor, had used a handgun he would have been able to take down a lot more targets before they realized what is going on and scattered.
The reason the government focuses on assault rifles is two fold:
1) Semi-auto rifles are designed to defeat body-armor, which the public doesn't wear, but the government enforces do.
2) They know it won't make any difference in homicide rates, which will allow them to move on to banning all guns.