- Joined
- Nov 6, 2012
- Messages
- 9,767
- Reaction score
- 1,416
Are you serious?
Yes. Serious question.
Are you serious?
They're tools used to provide personal protection. They're tools used in sporting hobbies like hunting and shooting competitions. They're tools used to protect valuable assets.
With all of the privately owned firearms in the US if they were truly causing more harm than good you'd know it.
Yes. Serious question.
An assault weapon for protection?
Must be a very insecure country. I live in Mexico. Never needed a gun.
Any downsides?
Sorry, I don't see how the joy of owning a weapon outweights the killing of innocent civilians.
Good thing nobody values your dumb ass opinion.I'd say it's more unfair to get killed by a nutjob that shouldn't of had that power to begin with.
I was under the impression you had some education or sufficient information to discuss this . . . gun free zones are the most common target for these types of shootings. Why? Because they're the locations with the least amount of resistance because visitors are prohibited from carrying a firearm to protect themselves. Except folks bent on doing others harm don't care and choose those locations carry out their evil act.
Just imagine how bad the shooting in the video below would've been had the security guard not been armed.
Vehicles are necessary for civilians, assault weapons aren't. Vehicles are used for transportation, weapons are used to kill.
Big difference.
Can you explain why it's bad logic?
Good thing nobody values your dumb ass opinion.

Nah
Kick rocks, snowflake.
So, more guns less mass shootings. Is that the argument?
What are you calling an assault weapon? Regardless, I want whatever weapon gives me the best advantage to protect myself and my family.
Why do you think owning a firearm means someone feels insecure? Most of us don't buy them for the sole purpose of shooting another person.
Nope. Not for a responsible person.
I don't think caving into the emotional pleas of others is justification for blaming others and trying to further infringe on our rights.
I'd say it's more unfair to get killed by a nutjob that shouldn't of had that power to begin with.
So why do they need them?
If something is causing more harm than good then maybe reconsider?
Any weapon that can kill many people in few seconds.
I meant unsafe. I'm pretty sure the large majority of americans do not need guns.
Not everybody is responsible. If assault weapons are allowed, then you must accept the consequences that come with it.
Maybe it's a silly right that you don't need in the first place.
Don’t cartel members run your country bro?An assault weapon for protection? Must be a very insecure country. I live in Mexico. Never needed a gun.
Any downsides?
Sorry, I don't see how the joy of owning a weapon outweights the killing of innocent civilians.
Sigh.
Defensive gun use is a thing. Improved physical security and the possibility of patrons being armed to protect themselves act as deterrents.
Don’t cartel members run your country bro?
My point was that the "fair/unfair" argument is a terrible one. We're talking about high powered weapons that are easily obtainable that are used to kill people, and we're talking about what's "fair"? How does one even make that argument in the face of a story like this where 18 people were murdered?It's more unfair to be enjoying yourself in a gun free zone with absolutely no means to protect yourself or no on-site security to deter said nutjob.
What's the saying?
Life ain't fair.
I see you've picked up the gun control skill of making stuff up to fit your view pretty quickly.
Has nothing to do with need.
Which is exactly why we're fighting tooth and nail against ignorant gun control folks from trying to institute more of their ridiculous restrictions.
And please, look of what the actual definition of an "assault weapon" is . . .
Wow. This conversation has been a complete waste of time.