Crime Jeffrey Epstein Dead

How do ya think Epstein died?


  • Total voters
    586
Here's some interesting footage of Lady Ghislaine being warmly received at the UN "representing civil society" in 2014, years after Epstein had been exposed and her own role in his crimes had largely been exposed as well.

 
I never said any such thing.

But the bigger factor is 'you're back?'

After you telling me offline you were sorry for your prior commitments her and in the prior thread where you admitted you lied about making money in stocks regularly when in fact you had admitted and I had quoted you showing you had losses? You admitted you want to create an image as a big stock player when in fact you rarely make any money and lost far more?

Also after you admitting you are on psych meds and when you come off you sometimes get over aggressive but once back on, yes you can apologize.

So should we all just assume this is another 'off med's' post and you will soon, off line be apologizing to me?

You're just asking questions

None of that happened you clown. I again challenge you to show this exchange. You tucked tail last time.
 
I generally agree with everything you said except a few points : there is no 'panic urge' as you call it when someone is attempting to die by compression of the carotid artery - you quickly black out. Second, it doesn't take much. A convict can use a plastic spoon or a pencil as a tourniquet with just a little bit of cloth and hopefully something to put right in the area of the artery - like a knot. You put the spoon in front so as the tension mounts, it's blocked from spinning open by your chin and chest.

Not sure about this particular situation, but incarcerated people find ways around everything.

I can't agree based on personal experience.

Boys being boys there was a very stupid game we all played in grade school. In that game we would purposely hyperventilate for a about a minute, take a deep breath and hold it and then a friend would put his hands on your carotid arteries and you would quickly pass out. You could even do it to yourself accept for the fact that as you got close to passing out your hands would always draw back in reflex and if your friend was holding you would reach for him. But you literally had about 1-2 seconds before they fell.
 
Extraction!

They used the previous “attempt” as cover.

He was wheeled out to freedom
Who does this benefit at this point? I'm going to have to be given a reason to give this serious consideration. Keeping him alive makes him a liability and requires a much larger and more precarious conspiracy than simply killing him and making it look like a suicide or coercing him to kill himself like Rommel or simply allowing him to kill himself. ALL of those scenarios seem much more plausible to me. I'm open minded but I need better reasons to believe that.
 
You're just asking questions

None of that happened you clown. I again challenge you to show this exchange. You tucked tail last time.
haha. No I am not dragging all that shit back up just to embarrass you so you can again apologize to me again directly.

What benefit is there in me pointing to your posts where you admit to taking the psycho meds and other stuff?

It is clear you have some lucid moments. It is clear you also don't. When lucid you admit you lie regularly and almost all your posts in the stock thread are shams. When not lucid you want people to believe you are some super stock trader, which you admit you lose far more than you make.

Dude, take a break, get back on your med's and post most coherently.
 
haha. No I am not dragging all that shit back up just to embarrass you so you can again apologize to me again directly.

What benefit is there in me pointing to your posts where you admit to taking the psycho meds and other stuff?

It is clear you have some lucid moments. It is clear you also don't. When lucid you admit you lie regularly and almost all your posts in the stock thread are shams. When not lucid you want people to believe you are some super stock trader, which you admit you lose far more than you make.

Dude, take a break, get back on your med's and post most coherently.

No. No. No. You did this last time and through all your ducking got all our posts deleted for derailing to your benefit. You can't show what you said you did and are derailing. Reported for derailing.
 
In this thread I’ve given news reports where he solicited girls as young as 8.

I’m sure he did the entire age spectrum. But wouldn’t be caught at parties with them that young. That’s his personal menu I’m sure when only his inner circle is around
I missed those the first time around. Would you mind posting them again, please?

Edit: Never mind. Saw the source already and commented on it in another post.
 
Last edited:
I never said any such thing.

But the bigger factor is 'you're back?'

After you telling me offline you were sorry for your prior commitments her and in the prior thread where you admitted you lied about making money in stocks regularly when in fact you had admitted and I had quoted you showing you had losses? You admitted you want to create an image as a big stock player when in fact you rarely make any money and lost far more?

Also after you admitting you are on psych meds and when you come off you sometimes get over aggressive but once back on, yes you can apologize.

So should we all just assume this is another 'off med's' post and you will soon, off line be apologizing to me?

lol seriously? Well that would explain him going fucking nuts on people in this thread over something so trivial.
 
lol seriously? Well that would explain him going fucking nuts on people in this thread over something so trivial.

He can't show anything about the stock shit he claims and was called out on it before. Don't expect anything. He is just saying it to try to annoy me. Ask him for proof.
 
lol seriously? Well that would explain him going fucking nuts on people in this thread over something so trivial.
Y4eQePL.gif
 
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9622107/jeffrey-epstein-eight-year-old-girls-sexually-abuse/

He asks for 8 year olds. Gonna have to assume he was raping children of all ages.

Remember the Clinton foundation trying to flee Haiti with all those little kids?

Where do you think they end up?

We need to overthrow our government and send our military spy assets against this man and his mossad handlers.
Honestly, sounds like sensationalist clickbait from The Sun to me. I've seen the same information reported on properly by better publications. In context, it becomes clear he's referring to a single sixteen year old girl, not two 8 year olds. 8 is a lot younger than anyone Epstein has been associated with. Again, my mind is open, but it is also discerning.
 


Just wanted to post this again:

feelings of vulnerability increase belief in conspiracy theories, as reflected in findings that feelings of powerlessness predict conspiracy beliefs (Abalakina‐Paap et al., 1999; Imhoff & Bruder, 2014),
 
The second is to instill feelings of security among the public, and provide them with a sense of hope and empowerment. For instance, if experiencing a lack of control increases conspiracy beliefs, does experiencing empowerment, that is, a high sense of control, reduce conspiracy beliefs? Research suggests that this is indeed the case. Van Prooijen and Acker (2015) found reduced conspiracy beliefs after activating a high sense of control as compared to a neutral baseline condition. Likewise, Whitson, Kim, Wang, Menon, and Webster (in press) found similar effects of inducing a promotion focus in participants, and these effects were attributable to increased feelings of control. Future research may expand on the ameliorating effects of more discrete positive emotional experiences on conspiracy beliefs: For instance, are citizens less suspicious of governmental information messages that contain humor? And, are citizens more likely to develop conspiracy theories about pessimistic as opposed to optimistic leaders? For now, evidence suggests that interventions designed to increase analytic thinking and decrease negative emotions may effectively reduce conspiracy beliefs.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282974/
 
Article III judges have the sturdiest tenure that exists. Not really such a thing as career suicide for them.
I was operating under the assumption this was a judge who was subject to being elected and reelected. When Brock Turner got a light sentence and the judge in that case, Aaron Persky, committed career suicide when he gave that sentence, it seemed to have a chilling effect on judges. If that is not the case with this judge, then thanks for the correction. Regardless, if the judge had given Epstein bail, it would have caused a lot of trouble for him, would have ruined his reputation, etc. Lots of incentives to keep Epstein locked up indefinitely.
 
Who does this benefit at this point? I'm going to have to be given a reason to give this serious consideration. Keeping him alive makes him a liability and requires a much larger and more precarious conspiracy than simply killing him and making it look like a suicide or coercing him to kill himself like Rommel or simply allowing him to kill himself. ALL of those scenarios seem much more plausible to me. I'm open minded but I need better reasons to believe that.

Mossad agents aren’t simply cut off to die in other nations jails.

They can’t kill him either. Its explicitly forbidden by the chief rabbinate.

They went to save their loyal soldier.
 
Yo that's a hell of a hat lol. The guy was googling how to destroy a hard drive and laptops in rivers, and he destroyed his hard drive and threw his laptop in a river yeah? I think he may just have done it to himself.

Would someone presumably as smart as a DA really need to google how to destroy a hard drive or a laptop though?
 
Do you think Epstein killed himself or do you think he was given help of some kind to die?
Lol you dont want to know what I think. I've been paying way too much attention to this bullshit and I still need more information (now watch someone come and tell me what I think with a few choice slurs tossed in). I will take that information as it comes but I dont expect anything at all will ever come from this.

Anyone who's wasting time arguing with someone like @JonesBones either doesnt really give a shit about this, or is really naive.
 
Honestly, sounds like sensationalist clickbait from The Sun to me. I've seen the same information reported on properly by better publications. In context, it becomes clear he's referring to a single sixteen year old girl, not two 8 year olds. 8 is a lot younger than anyone Epstein has been associated with. Again, my mind is open, but it is also discerning.

My other sources are better. I’ll dig them up after work
 
Back
Top