Crime Jeffrey Epstein Dead

[DIDM]

Any facts though?

Yes, the fact that there is no record of any sale, ANY.

Then he was taken off suicide watch, less than 2 weeks after attempting to kill himself. His cell mate was TRANSFERRED, so it was just ol Jeff in the cell, 24 hours after a huge document drop. One officer on duty was apparently “filling in”, the cameras malfunctioned and overworked employees didn’t check on him every 15 minutes.

I can’t wait to meet you and see what an utter worm you are. You are a literal parasite

 

[all caps]

Yes. The story will die with us being drug into the muck caught up in worthless arguments with each other. As always.

Anyone who tries to bring forth facts or research will be mocked and smeared here and everywhere.

The topic will probably end up being blacklisted.

@franklinstower ^^^

 

[nac386]

And the left have been insinuating that Trump's DOJ had him knocked off. Tis the wsy of the world now

It’s bad enough when normal people make outrageous unsupported accusations of murder and child abuse. But the president stopping to the level of internet conspiracy theorists is bizarre and concerning.

There are situations that are fishy, and you could argue that this is one. But without any evidence, it’s really low to accuse people of terrible things. You’ll never see me spreading these conspiracy theories because real people are often the victim.

Sure, it’s easy to say that even if Trump or Clinton had nothing to do with this, they are public figures and just have to deal with the accusations. But I disagree with that. They are public figures and because of that they should be criticized or ridiculed for what they actually do and say. They should not be criticized and ridiculed for things made up by people on the Internet that they did not do or say.

At some point the lies and exaggerations get to a point where people actually think some of these people are evil without any evidence at all. For example, it seems like A sizable group of people actually think that Hillary Clinton has ordered the murder of over 100 individuals.

Let’s assume the truth is actually the more likely scenario that she has ordered the murder of zero people. Even if you hate her politics, do people really find it that easy to morally justify accusing a person of mass murder just because you dislike her?

Is this the first person on the Trump hit list according to conspiracy theorists or have they accused him of murdering other people as well? Is disliking Trump enough of s reason to accuse him of murder?

To me it’s a bit insane.

 

[MikeMcMann]

lol seriously? Well that would explain him going fucking nuts on people in this thread over something so trivial.

Ya sadly. @BonesJones is at best manic. Catch him on the best day and he'll admit and be open to apologizing and admitting a lot of the things he says and does are a facade. He wants to portray a certain image of himself that sadly is not reality.

You can look back in this thread and see some of his admissions about the psycho meds and other stuff. Post histories have been his bane.

He needs to get on his meds and clear his head.

 

[JonesBones]

It’s bad enough when normal people make outrageous unsupported accusations of murder and child abuse. But the president stopping to the level of internet conspiracy theorists is bizarre and concerning.

There are situations that are fishy, and you could argue that this is one. But without any evidence, it’s really low to accuse people of terrible things. You’ll never see me spreading these conspiracy theories because real people are often the victim.

Sure, it’s easy to say that even if Trump or Clinton had nothing to do with this, they are public figures and just have to deal with the accusations. But I disagree with that. They are public figures and because of that they should be criticized or ridiculed for what they actually do and say. They should not be criticized and ridiculed for things made up by people on the Internet that they did not do or say.

At some point the lies and exaggerations get to a point where people actually think some of these people are evil without any evidence at all. For example, it seems like A sizable group of people actually think that Hillary Clinton has ordered the murder of over 100 individuals.

Let’s assume the truth is actually the more likely scenario that she has ordered the murder of zero people. Even if you hate her politics, do people really find it that easy to morally justify accusing a person of mass murder just because you dislike her?

Is this the first person on the Trump hit list according to conspiracy theorists or have they accused him of murdering other people as well? Is disliking Trump enough of s reason to accuse him of murder?

To me it’s a bit insane.

Don't forget the Jews too. Their dislike of Jews fits in the scapegoat narrative.

Yes, they are insane. Some may even say, NUTS.

 

[JonesBones]

Ya sadly. @BonesJones is at best manic. Catch him on the best day and he'll admit and be open to apologizing and admitting a lot of the things he says and does are a facade. He wants to portray a certain image of himself that sadly is not reality.

You can look back in this thread and see some of his admissions about the psycho meds and other stuff. Post histories have been his bane.

He needs to get on his meds and clear his head.

For now, evidence suggests that interventions designed to increase analytic thinking and decrease negative emotions may effectively reduce conspiracy beliefs.


<Lmaoo>

 

[MikeMcMann]

For now, evidence suggests that interventions designed to increase analytic thinking and decrease negative emotions may effectively reduce conspiracy beliefs.


<Lmaoo>

You are proof of how a little knowledge can be dangerous to those who do not comprehend what they read.

While it may be true that Cters use tactics such as 'asking questions' in an open ended way continually without really seeking answers that does not mean every question asked is a furtherance of a CT.

You have said out right to many people, myself included "YOU ARE ASKING QUESTIONS' and then said that means they are CTers with nothing more as a basis. I have said nothing in this thread that furthers any CT, I have not pushed any theories, but I do have questions. Everyone has questions, included you as the data on this is not out yet.

People on this forum are not the only ones with questions as almost every one who knows that Prison also does. Almost every law enforcement professional interviewed does. Almost every politician all say 'there are questions that need to be answered here??'

You then scream 'then you are ALL Ct'ers', and that is not true. Asking questions and looking for answers is valid in the investigation stage of things. It is if you do not accept the findings, once deliverer you delve into CT territory.

NOw again, get on your meds. And I will accept your apology when you send it offline later.

 

[JonesBones]

You are proof of how a little knowledge can be dangerous to those who do not comprehend what they read.

While it may be true that Cters use tactics such as 'asking questions' in an open ended way continually without really seeking answers that does not mean every question asked is a furtherance of a CT.

You have said out right to many people, myself included "YOU ARE ASKING QUESTIONS' and then said that means they are CTers with nothing more as a basis. I have said nothing in this thread that furthers any CT, I have not pushed any theories, but I do have questions. Everyone has questions, included you as the data on this is not out yet.

People on this forum are not the only ones with questions as almost every one who knows that Prison also does. Almost every law enforcement professional interviewed does. Almost every politician all say 'there are questions that need to be answered here??'

You then scream 'then you are ALL Ct'ers', and that is not true. Asking questions and looking for answers is valid in the investigation stage of things. It is if you do not accept the findings, once deliverer you delve into CT territory.

NOw again, get on your meds. And I will accept your apology when you send it offline later.

I'm green as hell today buddy. As usual.



I really hope you get that intervention. The scientific literature so far suggests it seems to work.

Offline? We communicate offline? lol.

 

[PainIsLIfe]

It’s bad enough when normal people make outrageous unsupported accusations of murder and child abuse. But the president stopping to the level of internet conspiracy theorists is bizarre and concerning.

There are situations that are fishy, and you could argue that this is one. But without any evidence, it’s really low to accuse people of terrible things. You’ll never see me spreading these conspiracy theories because real people are often the victim.

Sure, it’s easy to say that even if Trump or Clinton had nothing to do with this, they are public figures and just have to deal with the accusations. But I disagree with that. They are public figures and because of that they should be criticized or ridiculed for what they actually do and say. They should not be criticized and ridiculed for things made up by people on the Internet that they did not do or say.

At some point the lies and exaggerations get to a point where people actually think some of these people are evil without any evidence at all. For example, it seems like A sizable group of people actually think that Hillary Clinton has ordered the murder of over 100 individuals.

Let’s assume the truth is actually the more likely scenario that she has ordered the murder of zero people. Even if you hate her politics, do people really find it that easy to morally justify accusing a person of mass murder just because you dislike her?

Is this the first person on the Trump hit list according to conspiracy theorists or have they accused him of murdering other people as well? Is disliking Trump enough of s reason to accuse him of murder?

To me it’s a bit insane.

True,but no one has accused Trump of acting like a civilized adult. And honestly, Trump is apt to say the same thing a middle wchool child would say.

I couldnt tell you how many are supposedly on each side's #bodycount, but I agree that its a bit much. I would caveat that statement by saying that Epstein has shown us that a large number of rich and powerful people are actually evil.

 

[Hollywood Jack]

Naomi Campbell had some sort of strange connection to Epstein and Maxwell and her billionaire boyfriends did too. I've seen some people refer to her as a "phile" which seems improbable to me, but it's definitely something worth looking into. FWIW, Virginia Roberts Giuffre refers to her as being a "bitch" but doesn't implicate her in the sexual abuse.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/v...ve-calls-naomi-campbell-a-real-bch/vp-AAFKdCX

https://nypost.com/2019/08/13/jeffr...en-at-naomi-campbells-birthday-party-in-2001/

 

[all caps]

 

[D Train]

Someone help me out here. I know Epstein knew the Clintons and Trump and other power players, but why are people suggesting one of those people had him murdered? Because he had damning information on one (or more) of them relating to his charges?

 

[Teppodama]

Someone help me out here. I know Epstein knew the Clintons and Trump and other power players, but why are people suggesting one of those people had him murdered? Because he had damning information on one (or more) of them relating to his charges?

Likely or there is another player worried about information coming out about them. It was in the best interest of many many people for Epstein to die.

 

[Hollywood Jack]

Mossad agents aren’t simply cut off to die in other nations jails.

They can’t kill him either. Its explicitly forbidden by the chief rabbinate.

They went to save their loyal soldier.

To be clear, I don't think Mossad was involved in his death. But I think they essentially washed their hands of him after he outlived his usefulness. If powerful interests in the US wanted to kill Epstein in an American prison, I don't think Mossad could've stopped that even if they wanted to. Letting what happened to Epstein happen does not violate their rule about not killing their own.

 

[Happy Man]

Don't forget the Jews too. Their dislike of Jews fits in the scapegoat narrative.

Yes, they are insane. Some may even say, NUTS.

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS have said that they were told by higher up government officials that Epstein “belonged to intelligence”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/49355/acosta-was-told-epstein-belonged-intelligence-ryan-saavedra

And we all know for DAMN SURE that it wasn’t American intelligence.

So you get off the bullshit narrative you got going there.

 

[JSN]

Someone help me out here. I know Epstein knew the Clintons and Trump and other power players, but why are people suggesting one of those people had him murdered? Because he had damning information on one (or more) of them relating to his charges?

you answered your own question.

 

[Happy Man]

To be clear, I don't think Mossad was involved in his death. But I think they essentially washed their hands of him after he outlived his usefulness. If powerful interests in the US wanted to kill Epstein in an American prison, I don't think Mossad could've stopped that even if they wanted to. Letting what happened to Epstein happen does not violate their rule about not killing their own.

We will disagree on who we think is higher up the ladder of power.

 

[Graves The Elder]

has anyone mentioned the Rothschilds yet?
just checking.

 

[Hollywood Jack]

He was running a honeypot operation

He’s apparently a billionaire, has two private islands, that there is no bill of sale for, he was given the largest private residence in NYC, GIVEN, he has a 30k sf ranch, in NM, no record of sale, the man’s a mystery, oh, and he’s Jewish

Any facts though?

There were plenty of facts in there as well as opinions that can't be proven, but are rightly strongly suspected.

 

[MikeMcMann]

I'm green as hell today buddy. As usual.



I really hope you get that intervention. The scientific literature so far suggests it seems to work.

Offline? We communicate offline? lol.

Haha. Ya ok. Here you go again.

Shall I link the prior threads like last time where you bragged about gains and green until I quoted you admitting the losses in a prior post. Then you apologize and send me offline messages looking for peace. FLOL.

Grow up. Get on your meds. Post histories exist and people only need to look up thread here to see you admitting to your need for psycho med's.