God you people are weird.
Speculate speculate speculate. Too impatient to wait for details. Keen on assigning 100% certainty on your theories, and if someone disagrees they are either a sheep and not enlightened like yourself, or naive blah blah blah.
Key questions abound that people should know the answer before stating any impossibilities:
1) when someone is in jail at this place, what is the policy of their supervision? Does it afford the one the time to potentially kill themself?
2) how probable is it that the actual quality of the supervision is typical of the theoretical quality of the supervision? i.e. even if protocal a, b, and c is in place, much like how bathrooms are supposed to be cleaned at certain times of day, how often is that schedule adhered to?
Do guards perhaps not exercise the duty of care to monitoring accused sexual predators compared to others?
3) is the video recording when there was supposed to be? If there isn't, why not? How often do video recordings not take place at the jail when they should be?
4) for this to have been a murder, what's the minimum amount of people that would have to be involved to carry it out? Is it a hitman, and others at the jail to turn a blind eye, deliberately cut video surveillance etc.
Now, Iike most of us, there are certain things that aren't my area of expertise. One of which would be the exact processes of monitoring jailed individuals. And how these processes may or may not be altered for high net worth prisoners. Somehow, I suspect just about everybody in this thread that has some "it's for sure x" isn't an expert on these topics.
This convinces me just how much people like to think they are so smart without having the pre-requisite knowledge to be in any sort of a position to offer anything that resembles an educated opinion on something. You not only take your own abilities to determine what happened with something you did not witness way too highly, the level of arrogance is the expectation that others making the same mistake should take your baseless opinion serious. And even if you wind up being "right", it's still worthless.
It'd be like hearing someone flipped a coin somewhere, and I said it for sure 100% it landed on heads, and someone else saying for sure 100% in landed on tails. If it happened to have landed on heads it doesn't make me a genius and the other person an idiot. We're both idiots and one of us got lucky.
