- Joined
- Sep 24, 2007
- Messages
- 58,061
- Reaction score
- 30,739
Yeah that’s nice but a win is a win and a loss is a loss. You can’t say a win is a loss or a loss is a win. You couldn’t be as bright as you’re claiming to be if you can’t understand that simple concept. Get the basics down first before you try to spiral off on these like… bizarre tangents of pseudo-intellectual logic.
We’re not talking about what the fighter gets to do after the fight or where it puts them in the division. All we’re saying is that a loss here against Gane is a terrible look for the person who supposedly scared Jones off, considering Gane was not only beaten by Jones but wiped out in the first round. Gane’s not supposed to be on Tom’s level.
If you’re so confident about Aspinall smoking Gane, why are you this afraid of being held accountable for all the hype you’ve put behind him? I don’t get it. Why all the damage control before the fight even happens?
What damage control? I entered into this discussion overall based on the general concept that it's stupid to look at one common opponent and claim "he beat that guy easily, he didn't (or lost), thus that guy is better". It's a simplistic and stupid way to analyze fights. Period. You can pretend otherwise, obviously I can't stop you. But it makes it no less dumb.
And "a win is a win" means...nothing. Nobody felt Sterling was a "winner" after the first Yan fight. In your make believe world where context doesn't matter maybe people felt that way. Here in reality, nope. I don't know exactly how bright it makes me in being able to grasp this extremely simple concept...just that it evidently makes me brighter than you because you can't.
And again, Aspinall likely smokes Gane so what I'm saying is an overall view.