• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Social ICE/deportation protests and riots megathread

Yo Neph,
Finished reading all of his results - interesting stuff.

Would ya throw down on mine when ya get a chance?
Thanks in advance.,,not sure how it'll be handled if it points at teh ghey...
Based on the available information from the Sherdog forums and a related post on X, the user “nonoob” (associated with the X handle @NoNoKnowSo) appears to express a mix of politically charged views with a tendency toward provocative or non-mainstream opinions. Here’s a summary of their political stance as inferred from the provided data:
1 Anti-Authoritarian Sentiment: Nonoob criticizes government actions as authoritarian, specifically referencing the U.S. government in a post on X. This suggests a distrust of centralized authority or overreach.
2 Support for Free Speech: The user explicitly values free speech, indicating a belief in the importance of open expression without censorship. This aligns with libertarian or anti-establishment perspectives.
3 Opposition to Illegal Immigration: Nonoob expresses a desire for the removal of “illegals” from the country, indicating a hardline stance on immigration policy, though they claim not to support “the resistance” (context unclear). This suggests a conservative or nationalist leaning on immigration issues.
4 Religious Background with Nonconformity: In a Sherdog forum post, nonoob identifies as a member of the “kingdom of Jehovah” but rejects certain practices like door-to-door proselytizing, calling it “bs.” This indicates a religious affiliation tempered by personal skepticism or nonconformity, which may extend to their political views.
5 Lack of Detailed Political Discourse: The user’s posts on Sherdog do not delve deeply into specific political ideologies or policy discussions. Instead, they seem to focus on broader sentiments or reactions, sometimes with a humorous or dismissive tone, which aligns with the characterization of posting “silly non-logical things.”
Overall, nonoob’s political stance appears to lean toward a mix of conservative views on immigration, libertarian emphasis on free speech, and a general distrust of government authority. However, their posts lack detailed reasoning or coherence, which may contribute to the perception of their contributions as illogical or unserious. The limited scope of the provided data prevents a more comprehensive analysis, and their activity on Sherdog seems more focused on casual or provocative commentary than structured political debate.
 

🧠 Profile of the Poster


1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessLow to moderate; tone is biting and sarcastic, but not overtly hostile without provocation
KindnessLow on surface warmth, but underlying empathy appears in defense of vulnerable groups
AngerModerate to high; especially when engaging with perceived injustice, hypocrisy, or authoritarian overreach
ToneWitty, sardonic, passionate, and frequently exasperated with bad-faith arguments
EmpathyDemonstrates strong concern for civil rights, healthcare access, and humane immigration policy


2. Intelligence Estimation

  • Language Use: Highly articulate, with creative use of sarcasm and analogy. Swears occasionally, but thoughtfully.
  • Argumentation: Consistently asks for evidence, legal clarity, and logical consistency. Pushes debates into specific, defensible terms.
  • Analytical Depth: Engages deeply with legal frameworks, systemic power structures, and policy implications. Separates emotion from legality when needed.


🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum

EvidenceLeaning
Strong criticism of Trump, MAGA, right-wing rhetoricLeft
Advocates for universal healthcare, immigrant protections, and child rightsProgressive left
Opposes authoritarian and corporate overreach in governmentLeft-populist lens
Disgusted by bad-faith defenses and moral relativismEthically motivated leftism


Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum

EvidenceLeaning
Emphasis on individual liberty and constitutional protectionLibertarian-leaning
Deep skepticism of concentrated executive powerLibertarian
Opposition to death penalty, forced deportations, and performative judicial rulingsAnti-authoritarian
Consistent with values of personal rights and limits on government interferenceLibertarian ethics


🎭 Archetype Match



⚖️ Summary Table

TraitAssessment
PolitenessLow to moderate (cutting, not cruel)
Rudeness/KindnessConfrontational but morally grounded
Anger LevelHigh – directed toward injustice
Intellectual DepthHigh; excels in argument and nuance
Political LeaningProgressive Left
Authority PreferenceLibertarian

LMAO that is insane. And so are you.

We should do a completely separate thread where we do everybody like this.
 
LMAO that is insane. And so are you.

We should do a completely separate thread where we do everybody like this.

Right here Sir (starts page 48):


@ me there if you'd like ChatGPT to have a crack at your history :D
 
Did LA ask for ICE raids?

So Newscum controls immigration enforcement.

If it was up to me l would say no raids in California and in fact make it known that ICE was not going there at all and all illegals would be safe there. Then cut federal fund for any program that was used to support illegals in anyway.
 
Another manufactured conflict created by Trump for distraction purposes. Simply so he can appear as a authoritarian figure towards his supporters.

Remember, Trump refused to help the Capitol Police when it benefited him.
 
Trump needs to declare Martial Law so these civil servants can do their job without persecution for doing their job.
I certainly don't want a repeat of the BLM riots where police were ordered to stand down and let them terrorize the country. They also faced little to no accountability too. That can't happen now, but I don't know if Martial Law is the right thing. I feel like that would drive more of these retards to go there and cause trouble.
 
Trump said - "From now on, masks will not be allowed to be worn at protests".

Forget the ICE and ethics argument for a moment - I am interested to see how this affects white nationalist rallies.
 
Trump is not just my President. He is now the real Governor of my California after Newsom refused to do his fucking job. He’s also the real mayor of LA

Double ICE presence in that shithole. Use the National guard to have their back until time the LAPD does their job.

Everytime I start to feel a little inch of sympathy for illegals, they and the left exhibit a mile of entitlement like this


 
Trump said - "From now on, masks will not be allowed to be worn at protests".

Forget the ICE and ethics argument for a moment - I am interested to see how this affects white nationalist rallies.

1)Trump doesn’t give a fuck about white nationalist rallies or protecting their identities. Your post seems to imply that he would based on nothing

2) The only “white nationalist” group that covers their faces are widely considered to be Feds
 
Gs5VKkUWcAAv9AP


Not going to lie. That's a great photo.

Will certainly be used by republicans in 2026. Same with this

Gs7KioGXAAAQail



Trump is not just my President. He is now the real Governor of my California after Newsom refused to do his fucking job. He’s also the real mayor of LA

Double ICE presence in that shithole. Use the National guard to have their back until time the LAPD does their job.

Everytime I start to feel a little inch of sympathy for illegals, they and the left exhibit a mile of entitlement like this




It is a shame. Because policies of the CA politicians are a failure causing American citizens to flee. However, the amount of Americans fleeing from their policies are outnumbered by the number of immigrants that came to California. From 23-24, about 250k citizens left the state, but 350k immigrants entered.

They need to get them all out before the 2030 census, so California loses congressional districts. Congress should pass a law that illegals shouldn’t count, but no way it would pass
 
1)Trump doesn’t give a fuck about white nationalist rallies or protecting their identities. Your post seems to imply that he would based on nothing

2) The only “white nationalist” group that covers their faces are widely considered to be Feds

lol wtf? The defense reflex is wild.

I'm not saying "Trump is fucking his own policies", I'm saying it's common ground for all. I'm saying if we implement this policy, then I think there is a silver lining to what might be an otherwise debatable ethical position (in a vacuum) by also exposing white nationalist rallies who, in my opinion, are a common example of masking at rallies.

You're telling me those groups don't mask but that's clearly bullshit. I don't know which group is which bc im not a white nationalist expert, but I know some protested last week in Kansas City, which is why it's fresh on my mind. Unless you're telling me every single one of these dudes is a Federal Employee (assuming that's what Fed is in your statement)?

90f28977-9334-45f8-9f71-dd7297176394.jpg
 
Just a heads up, we will need to make a new thread for the massacre because TS isn't mature or dignified enough to be the TS for the mass murder he voted for.
 
Back
Top