- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 44,329
- Reaction score
- 5,380
i don't understand a woman (or man) who'd marry someone, be with them for years, then all of a sudden say that they are no longer "attracted to them in that way", unless maybe that individual changed drastically in physical appearance, to the point where it's beyond repair. if it's something else though, they should have never gotten married in the first place.
this is only speculation, but i think there is a lot of truth to it.
i think that two things happened, here.
- herself and her husband were obviously single when they first met. the guy was probably more confident and humorous then. but like all marriages, the sparks began to dissipate. both partners went from a single to a married lifestyle. the husband is satisfied because he has consistent vagina with a woman he finds attractive. the woman is no longer satisfied, because he lost the qualities that made him attractive to her in the first place.
nothing kills attraction to a woman more than boredom. maybe females who are reading this can expand on this point.
- this woman that i am talking about places financial security as paramount. the husband is a doctor and makes great money. if they were to divorce, i get the feeling that she would begin to experience insecurity, and may fear the loss of her current standard of living. it's a choice that each individual has to make. and like i mentioned, she doesn't want to go through the ordeal of her family relationships falling apart.
we've talked about this at length, and i tell her that she needs to make this decision on her own. how important is her financial security when it directly affects her needs as a woman?