Why would a president be able to waive civil service rules at a whim? There's a proper way to fire workers, follow it. That's straight forward enough.No. I didn’t find it strange. it’s not that they don’t feel they have a case to explain the presidential authority to hire and fire workers within the executive branch. That seems pretty easy, doesn’t it?
Do you also oppose venue shopping by the GOP? I'm personally fine with randomizing judge assignments, or for that matter supreme court assignments.It’s intentional because they know it was a shopped judge who is predisposed to the ruling they were sought out for and the appeal phase is all that matters. They’ll testify and lay their case for that. Should be a layup
At any rate, your complaint is moot given multiple judges across the country rejected Trump's illegal efforts.
The judiciary and quite a few democrats supported reforms to stop venue shopping. But Texas' most extreme jurisdictions and the GOP fought this reform. Seems a little hypocritic to only now be concerned with venue shopping, doesn't it?But I understand the frustration and the desire to flout them. It is blatant judge shopping and activism. How do all these left wing grievances so conveniently land at the feet of an Obama, Biden or Clinton judge?
Are you sure you're against venue shopping in general, or only when it aligns with your partisan preferences?