- Joined
- Mar 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,119
- Reaction score
- 1
Saying that someone is the enemy and are still willing to work with them is a far cry from telling them no 100% of the time.
Such a preposterous statement
Saying that someone is the enemy and are still willing to work with them is a far cry from telling them no 100% of the time.
There was an overall poor turnout in 2014, not just among low income earners (who always turn out at lower rates anyway). And your whole argument is based on the idea low income voters don't count. It's fucking silly.A hack? Bro, can you read? Of course voter turn out was low. Because the army of poor folks that voted for Obama didn't show up to vote in the Mid Term elections. This argument is so flawed at it's core its astounding. You Liberal Intellectuals all care deeply about politics, are all universally concerned and united behind the direction you wish to take this country.... except for when its time to f**king vote. So again, keep believing those reports. Keep to trying to find a way to justify that ass kicking as something other than the majority of the country being flat out tired of Progressive Liberal nonsense. Because that is what it is, nonsense.
Mine and many others, perhaps you should try being objective.
Unlike you and your leftist ilk here
I have no issue with people blocking stuff they don't believe inn the dems did it once the gop is now. You don't elect someone to agree to the opposite viewpoint
I don't know where you got the impression that he's my buddy.No, he wasn't the Senate Majority Leader. He was too busy helping to bring about the subprime mortgage crisis for all of that nonsense.
Only 44% of Trump voters think the practice of Islam should even be legal at all in the United States, to 33% who think it should be illegal.
-70% think the Confederate flag should still be flying over the State Capital, to only 20% who agree with it being taken down. In fact 38% of Trump voters say they wish the South had won the Civil War to only 24% glad the North won and 38% who aren't sure. Overall just 36% of Republican primary voters in the state are glad the North emerged victorious to 30% for the South, but Trump's the only one whose supporters actually wish the South had won.
That's a reasonably probable outcome and it wouldn't rustle my jimmies.Only in your fragile little mind are they
Nothing will come of this other than to move Obama's pick slightly more to the center
You elect someone to work with the opposition to move the country forward as a whole. The GOP hasn't even tried to work with the President on anything. It's been "Our way or GTHO"
More today that's relevant to this thread:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/02/trump-clinton-still-have-big-sc-leads.html
Real Constitution-loving patriots.
You might or at least you think you do
I and most others elect someone that reflects my beliefs and interests. Since many of those are not going to coincide with this administration policies why would I want them to agree
To move the Nation forward maybe and not have 4 to 8 years of stagnation in the political processes of the Government?
You have an odd sense of humor, I guess. My example was people trying to use dirty tactics to get something and having it blow up in their faces, while yours is people using dirty tactics to get something and then getting it.
Also, Trump has almost no chance of beating Clinton. Rubio would be near 50/50, but in another example of how today's loony right puts emotion over reason, his chances of winning in the primary seem to be falling.
Talking about Obama. Like him or not, you can't really deny that he's comfortably in the top 0.1% of intelligence. And while I was kidding, he'd actually be great on the court.
S.RES. 334. ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION.
This vote was on a resolution proposed by the Democrats who hoped to prevent President Eisenhower from using recess appointments to fill a vacancy in the Supreme Court. The full title of the resolution was Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court's Business.
Also, Trump has almost no chance of beating Clinton. Rubio would be near 50/50, but in another example of how today's loony right puts emotion over reason, his chances of winning in the primary seem to be falling.
.
There was an overall poor turnout in 2014, not just among low income earners (who always turn out at lower rates anyway). And your whole argument is based on the idea low income voters don't count. It's fucking silly.
And you don't even understand my argument. We are just wasting time here.
What exactly is your argument against turnout being a major factor in midterm GOP success?Whatever you need to believe to retreat behind the veil.
Why are you so sure? I am quite a liberal but it would be very hard for me to vote for Hillary over any conservative candidate (ironically, I would prefer Hillary over Rubio though). And especially Trump, I don't think he would be that bad. He is pretty moderate in most of his ideas (he is definitely not as rightwing s Cruz or most of the Tea Party people) and political reality would force him to act reasonably anyway. I would rather vote Trump than Rubio or Cruz and I would definitely prefer Trump to Clinton.
What can you not grasp that at least half the country doesn't agree with you and doesn't think it is forward
Inb4 its because he is black and they are racist
No motherfucker they don't agree
I don't know where you got the impression that he's my buddy.